Samsung Galaxy S10e Review

In the past couple of years, there was probably no other group of people more neglected by the smartphone industry than those who wanted a phone that is small yet good, not handicapped by sub-par chips and cameras. As phone makers were releasing bigger and faster phones, it seemed like everyone collectively forgot that despite all the benefits of a big screen, a smaller device has its own merits: for starters, it is easier to operate in one hand and much more comfortable to carry in your pocket.

This year, Samsung aims to finally deliver to this neglected crowd with a compact superphone that makes no compromises: it has top-notch specs, camera and performance. This compact superphone is the new Galaxy S10e.

And while we are not yet sure what the “e” stands for, Samsung says this phone is “built for those who want all the premium essentials”, so we guess “e” stands for “essential” after all.

But... is the Galaxy S10e really as good a device as it looks and should those waiting for a great compact phone go out and buy it right now? I am one of those that felt neglected these past few years and I had almost surrendered to the thought that the future belongs to big phones and it is me who should adjust. Thankfully, the S10e is now here in my hands and I can already tell you this much: if you are like me, you will like this phone. You will like it a lot.

What’s in the box:

  • Phone (duh!)
  • AKG-tuned in-ear headphones with extra eartip sizes
  • Samsung Fast Adaptive wall charger (15 watts)
  • USB-C to standard USB cable (for easy data transfer between two USB-C phones)
  • microUSB to USB-C adapter (so you can use your old cables)
  • SIM tool

Design and Size

Premium materials, small size and a punch-hole design

So where exactly does the S10e fit in terms of size and isn’t it too small?

Actually, this new Galaxy is not quite as tiny as an iPhone SE, but it is almost exactly as big as an iPhone XS or a Google Pixel 3. So no, the S10e is definitely not too small for comfortable use.

It also has the design and styling of its more expensive S10 siblings with a similar premium glass-and-metal construction and tiny bezels. One thing that is different is the screen, which is flat while the other S10 phones have their screens curved at the edges. This way, the side bezels are slightly more visible, but you get less accidental touches when using the phone, so we see this more as an advantage rather than a compromise.

With the S10e you also get full IP68 water and dust protection, as well as familiar Samsung staples like a 3.5 mil headphone jack and a microSD card slot. Speaking of the headphone jack, the AKG-tuned headphones that come for free with the S10e look stylish and sit very comfortably in the ear, plus they don’t sound too bad (they do lack in bass, though, and if you care about good sound, you should definitely get better ones).

What’s also making a comeback is the Bixby button. We still don’t understand why Samsung insists on having a separate Bixby button despite the overwhelming consensus that Bixby is neither as good, nor as fast as the Google Assistant. If you are not using Bixby, though, this time around, you can actually turn this button into something useful: in settings, you can change this button to launch Bixby only with a double click, while a single press could start a custom app and I have set this to open Spotify, for instance.

Samsung Galaxy S10e

Samsung Galaxy S10e


5.6 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches

142.2 x 69.9 x 7.9 mm


5.29 oz (150 g)

Google Pixel 3

Google Pixel 3


5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches

145.6 x 68.2 x 7.9 mm


5.22 oz (148 g)

Apple iPhone XS

Apple iPhone XS


5.65 x 2.79 x 0.3 inches

143.6 x 70.9 x 7.7 mm


6.24 oz (177 g)

Apple iPhone XR

Apple iPhone XR


5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches

150.9 x 75.7 x 8.3 mm


6.84 oz (194 g)

Samsung Galaxy S10e

Samsung Galaxy S10e


5.6 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches

142.2 x 69.9 x 7.9 mm


5.29 oz (150 g)

Google Pixel 3

Google Pixel 3


5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches

145.6 x 68.2 x 7.9 mm


5.22 oz (148 g)

Apple iPhone XS

Apple iPhone XS


5.65 x 2.79 x 0.3 inches

143.6 x 70.9 x 7.7 mm


6.24 oz (177 g)

Apple iPhone XR

Apple iPhone XR


5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches

150.9 x 75.7 x 8.3 mm


6.84 oz (194 g)

To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page

The more interesting thing, however, is the fingerprint scanner: it’s built in the home key on the right, while the other two S10 models have a newer kind, an ultrasonic fingerprint reader that sits under the screen. In terms of speed and accuracy, this regular fingerprint scanner on the S10e works better, but I still don’t find it nearly as effortless and as reliable as, say, Face ID on iPhones. I have also noticed that if you put a slightly bigger case on the S10e that makes access to the fingerprint reader harder, you get a lot more failed attempts, plus the button is a bit too high up and you have to stretch your finger a bit to reach it. Again, I got used to it in a few days, but I was constantly getting failed readings with a case and the whole thing did not feel as fast or effortless as I would have liked.

One more extra included on the S10e is wireless charging, plus you also have the reverse wireless charging option available (Samsung calls this PowerShare).


The 5.8” Dynamic AMOLED alone is a good enough reason to buy this. It’s that impressive.

As I was using the S10e, I was wondering these days what is more important for me in a phone, whether it’s the camera or the great battery life. With these thoughts at the back of my head, I was just scrolling around and suddenly it struck me that there was one thing that did not fail to impress me every single time I unlocked this phone, and it was neither the camera, nor the battery life: it was the screen.

The 5.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED on the Galaxy S10e is such an incredibly rich and good-looking display that it alone is a good enough reason to buy this phone and just admire the colors. It’s a 1080p panel, in case you were wondering, and at this smaller screen size you don’t need a higher resolution, everything is perfectly sharp. The contrast, the deep blacks, the viewing angles, everything is excellent.

One thing to note here is that Samsung has simplified display settings and you now have just two options: a “natural’ and a “vivid” setting. The default now is the natural one and it looks great, but if you are used to those super saturated “Samsung colors” then you should switch to the vivid mode, which is similar to the default “Adaptive” color setting in earlier Samsung models.

And the punch hole camera? Well, it’s tinier than a notch, so it’s less of a distraction, but it’s still definitely noticeable. You can also mask it in settings, but that creates an artificial big bezel at the top of the phone and seems to makes matters worse, not better. At the end of the day, the punch hole camera is just not a big deal, it’s something that you get used to and move on. Would we still want a true all-screen phone? Yes, please, but that’s still a good step towards that future.

Other display features like the Always-on Display and the Edge Panels are also still here and work as you’d expect.

Interface and Functionality

Samsung’s new One UI gets rid of unnecessary clutter and simplifies things

Samsung’s interface has its reputation preceding it and not in a good way, but these days, it has improved a great deal on the S10e.

While previous UIs like TouchWiz were known for overwhelming users with technicalities and minutiae, One UI is now clean of clutter and user-friendly with nice little touches like a brightness slider that appears on the bottom of the screen within easy reach and with app navigation also moved to the bottom.

You also have some little tricks that are not available on stock Android like an easy GIF and collage creation in the gallery (simply select two or more images and tap the buttons menu in the top right corner to create a collage). Some things that are available on other skins, however, are missing, and there is still no native screen video recorder, for instance.

One of the biggest new features in One UI are navigation gestures. Nav gestures are not enabled by default and you need to manually switch away from the traditional on-screen button navigation, but it’s worth at least giving them a shot. They are a bit cluttered, especially on the small-screen S10e, as all start from the bottom of the screen, but you get used to it. Don’t forget that a swipe up and hold from the center is the gesture to start the Google Assistant.

You can find more useful tips and tricks in our video here:

Processor, Performance and Memory

Fast, but not smooth. Yep, it’s possible.

If you look at the specs and the amount of horsepower that we have gained over the years, you would think that all flagship phones would be lightning fast, no exceptions, end of discussion.

Unfortunately, it is not that simple and Samsung phones in particular have had this fame of slowing down over time.

So here is the deal with the S10e: it’s got a Snapdragon 855 chip (or Exynos 9820 if you live outside the US) and it is lightning fast, but it is not smooth. This is an important and a subtle distinction and it has to do with animations and transitions, and the “feeling” of using a phone, something that those who are only looking at benchmark number will not understand.

And this has been a recurring theme that Samsung phones have kind of had throughout the years: generally fast performance, but no “flow”. And to illustrate this, we have to bring the comparison that so many Samsung fans do not like: the iPhone. These days, it’s not just the iPhone that has some buttery smooth transitions and animations, but also phones like the Google Pixel series and the OnePlus series are all devices that have that flow. So what about the S10e? What’s changed this year is that the Galaxy S10e is not simply fast: it’s lightning fast. What’s not changed is the smoothness and flow part, which is still not quite there.

And with this in mind, we can now look at the benchmark scores:

AnTuTu is a multi-layered, comprehensive mobile benchmark app that assesses various aspects of a device, including CPU, GPU, RAM, I/O, and UX performance. A higher score means an overall faster device.

Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Google Pixel 3
Apple iPhone XS
Apple iPhone XR

While specs don’t always tell the whole story, when it comes to storage, they do and here is that story: you have 128 gigs on-board storage, double that of last year’s Galaxies and double that of iPhone rivals. You might not appreciate this extra storage on day one, or even on month 1, but you probably will in a few month or a year after you buy the phone.

Samsung also keeps the microSD card slot here, which is an easy way to expand the storage even further, should you run out.


Not the absolute best, but still among the finest

The Galaxy S10e comes with two cameras on the back and one at the front.

The rear cameras are a regular one (12MP 26mm one with variable f/1.5 or f/2.4 aperture) and an ultra-wide one (16MP at 12mm with fixed f/2.2 aperture), while up front you have a 10 megapixel shooter.

The camera app in One UI is better than on earlier versions with easier swipe navigation between different shooting modes and the settings are better organized. And you can still quick-start it with a double click on the power button.

Image Quality

But does the phone actually shoot good pictures? And is it better than the Galaxy S9?

The answer to the first question is yes, and the answer to the second question is… not really much better in pure quality, but that wide-angle camera is indeed a welcome addition. We should also clarify that the cameras on the S10e offer exactly the same quality as the cameras on the S10 and the S10+.

The time needed to start the camera app, focus, take a pic and save it.

sec Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Google Pixel 3
Apple iPhone XS
Apple iPhone XR

Last year’s S9 was a big leap in camera quality: photos on it had less sharpening artifacts, more details and better color than earlier S series. The S10e, on the other hand, is not such a big leap forward. The most noticeable change comes in low-light photos where the S10e changes its behavior: while the S9 would pick shorter shutter speeds and lower ISOs to minimize noise, the S10+ definitely tends to shoot at much higher ISOs, but also much higher speeds to ensure you get a sharp picture, even if it has a lot more noise in it. During the day, the S10e captured quite a few clearly overexposed photos (not ruined, but still a stop or two overexposed). This used to happen every once in a while on the S9 too, but now happens regularly on the S10e.

Even though you have no telephoto camera on the S10e, you can still take Live Focus portrait shots using the main camera. These turn out good most of the time, with fairly good object separation, but sometimes you get some strange blurry spots in seemingly random places in the image. There are also a few new ways to blur the background such as to imitate speed and these can be fun, but mostly a gimmick.

Selfies turn out pretty good, but you don’t quite get the dynamic range that you can see on photos from say the Pixel 3. You also have two zoom levels for the selfie shots. It turns out that the default zoomed-in level is simply a cropped part of the sensor, while to get the full sensor output, you should shoot at the wider zoom level.

Video quality

You’ve got to try the new Super Smooth mode!

There are some great new video features on the S10e.

The biggest one is probably the new Super Smooth mode that you enable by tapping the wavy hand icon at the top center in the camera app. This only works for 1080p videos, but it truly makes some magic happen and you get impressively smooth footage, almost as if you were using a gimbal stabilizing device.

Of course, 4K60 and 4K30 modes are both available, and give you much sharper footage with more detail. Focus is very fast, but there is no gradual transition when switching focus points.

Sound quality

You have two loudspeakers on the S10e, one on the bottom and another one embedded in the earpiece, and considering how small this phone is, we were really blown away with the quality. First, sound gets very loud without too much distortion, and second, you have very clear and crisp mid-tones and highs. The one slight downside is that you don’t get much depth in the lower, bass sounds, but only a few phones manage to do well in that regard.

Samsung really does a great job of showcasing how good those speakers are with its selection of ringtones that sound really epic, maybe even too epic if you have the volume at full blast.

Call Quality

When it comes to call quality, we’ve had zero issues with S10e. Voices sound very loud and very clear, with a natural ring to them and the mic also produces a clear and crisp sound for your callers on the other end of the line.

Battery life

Mostly fine

With a 3,100 mAh battery on board, the S10e has the smallest battery cell of all new S10 models, but that is to be expected: it’s also the smallest phone and its 1080p screen has less pixels to push.

So how is the actual battery life?

Our real-life experience shows that this phone will definitely last you a full day, even if it’s a longer one, and you should not be worried about the smaller battery size.

We have also run our proprietary battery test here and you can see the results below, you can clearly see that while the S10+ does indeed have the longer battery life, the difference is not all that huge and the S10e actually beats the S10 model:

We measure battery life by running a custom web-script, designed to replicate the power consumption of typical real-life usage. All devices that go through the test have their displays set at 200-nit brightness.

hours Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S10e
7h (Good)
Google Pixel 3
8h 22 min (Excellent)
Apple iPhone XS
8h 37 min (Excellent)
Apple iPhone XR
11h 1 min (Excellent)
Samsung Galaxy S10
6h 45 min (Average)
Samsung Galaxy S10+
7h 59 min (Good)

Samsung also provides a 15-watt fast charger in the box and it fully recharges the phone in less than an hour and a half.

You also have fast wireless charging on board, which is a nice extra (you would need to buy a wireless charger separately, as Samsung does not provide one in the box).

And then the S10e also support reverse charging which allows your phone itself to act as the wireless charger. This could actually prove useful with Samsung’s new Galaxy Watch Active and Galaxy Buds headphones as both of them have small batteries and you can easily charge these up by just placing them on the back of your S10e. You can also use the reverse wireless charging to charge another phone with the S10e, but that would usually not be a good idea as it drains your battery quickly and charges that other phone slowly. It could prove handy for someone who needs just a quick short top-up, but definitely not as a replacement for regular charging.

Price and Alternatives

At a price of $750, the Galaxy S10e is definitely not an affordable phone by any means. It’s merely less expensive than the ultra premium flagships that have flooded the market recently.

If you are looking for a phone at about that price, the obvious alternative would be the iPhone XR. The iPhone is a much bigger phone, and its advantages include the guaranteed timely software updates, the iOS ecosystem which offers a bit more in terms of apps and compatibility with various connected gadgets, and the smoother performance. The Galaxy, on the other hand, has the better display and Android has its perks too.

If you are looking for a great small phone, you have the Pixel 3 and the iPhone XS as other options. The Pixel is still the king of night photography, and we have already touched on iOS and the iPhone.


It’s time to sum things up and after using the Galaxy S10e for a while, I no longer feel that smartphone makers have neglected users who prefer smaller phones.

For those who want a compact phone that is great in pretty much every aspect, the Galaxy S10e is a “finally!” moment. Finally, a no-compromise compact Android phone!

Sure, it has its flaws: Bixby, the slightly awkward fingerprint scanner, the not quite perfect gesture navigation, the noisy low-light time camera shots, and a few others, but those feel like the proverbial fly in the ointment. The great screen, the fast speed, the plentiful storage and the cleaner One UI easily make up for that, and the S10e is an easy recommendation on our part.


  • Beautiful design with water protection
  • Impressive screen quality
  • Plentiful storage in even base model
  • Fast (but not smooth)
  • Very good camera (but not quite the best)


  • Bixby
  • Side fingerprint scanner is not as good as a rear one or as Face ID
  • Gesture navigation does not feel perfectly refined
  • A bit too pricey

PhoneArena Rating:


User Rating:

3 Reviews

More content with (Galaxy S10e)



1. eli577

Posts: 142; Member since: Jun 29, 2010

Finally a score above 9 for an android phone. The one thing that bothers me is that if this phone gets a 9.2, then how come the S10+ only got 9? It's pricier, but obviously the better in almost every aspect.

8. Victor.H

Posts: 1099; Member since: May 27, 2011

I always find it funny how we post a review with a ton of details, photos and a bunch of other info, but everyone in the comments is obsessing over the score. And yes, scoring is probably the toughest part of reviewing a phone, it's hard to put thousands of words in a single number :)

71. dazed1

Posts: 808; Member since: Jul 28, 2015

hey Victor, What should we do in order to get full resolution photos of the reviews? beg you? You are professional site, that reviews high end phones, what should i conclude with measly 1600x1200 resolution??? PLEASE give us full resolution option, include the regular album, but under it add full resolution link to gdrive/whatever, thanks.

59. Valinor

Posts: 182; Member since: Mar 26, 2013

Because this is the perfect phone. The score reflects the total package including the price. I have the s10+ and yes it has more gadgets but most of those features also have a downside. Higher resolution: yes s10/s10+ is better and higher resolution is also handy when looking at 4k footage. Winner s10/s10+ Curved screen: honestly i prefer a flat screen with curved bezels. Looks better and no accidental touches when holding the phone. Winner s10e Inscreen fingerprint: looks awesome but needing to press on the screen a bit is annoying. Also because there are no edges you sometimes miss the spot. With the s9 i only had to touch the scanner lightly and it would unlock. S10e optical scanner should be the same so Winner s10e 3rd camera Telelens: Basically useless. Same with the second depth sensor on the front of the s10+. Yeah its nice to have but how many times will you actually use it. Zoom still sucks on smartphones. And definitely not worth the price difference. All other specs are the the same. Yes a bigger phone will get you a bigger battery and screen but does that make it a better phone? Nope, thats just personal preference. So as a phone I also think this one looks and is the "better" one of all 3. The only reason I went with the s10+ is because i really wanted a big phone. If they had released a s10e plus for the same price as the s10+ i would have gone with the s10e plus.

2. rouyal

Posts: 1583; Member since: Jan 05, 2018

The best version of the S10s, if you like Galaxy phones, imo. No gimmick ultrasonic that can’t work with tgsp, no gimmick edge display with false touches, more compact, and still 95% functional as the more expensive versions.

13. maherk

Posts: 7029; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

Every review on this planet is raining compliments on the side fingerprint scanner on the S10e, and even me as an owner of an S10+ and tried the S10e, wish we had the side mounted fps, not that it isn't good, but the one on the S10e is better than every fps I've ever tested before. Yet, and somehow, this is a con and isn't better than FaceID. First, how is it not better? And two, I've never seen you guys do a direct comparison between the fps and faceid in a review. But for the sake of it, explain how an authentication method that needs one simple tap to lock and unlock your device, that is hack proof and can be used for gestures, is worse than a method that can be tricked, that is significantly slower, and isn't as consistent.

28. midan

Posts: 3131; Member since: Oct 09, 2017

You need to use face ID to understand the beauty of it. Like i've said many times. Unlocking your phone is only part of it. The more secured apps you use the better Face ID gets. It's like invisible lock. People can't read your notifications on lockscreen. When you use banking apps, whatsapp etc. or fill passwords online, face ID just do those automaticly for you. As i use fingerprint scanner with my iPad every day and have face ID with my phone i can see how effortless it makes the whole experience.

31. Vancetastic

Posts: 1798; Member since: May 17, 2017

I have an iPhone X. My ONLY complaint about it is FaceID. It’s not as fast or as convenient as a good fingerprint scanner, and likely not as secure, either, at least, for me. I have to pick up the phone and aim it at my face. This, of course, is only my opinion. Crazy how it’s different from yours, eh? Unlike you, I’m not going to try to convince everyone that I’m right, and they’re wrong. Enjoy your FaceID, if it works better for you. Don’t assume that it’s the best for everyone. That’s just arrogant.

67. luis.aag90

Posts: 278; Member since: Aug 12, 2014

I totally agree. Also comparing two different approaches of biometric sensors is like comparing apples to oranges. The S10E implementation is as good as it can get. No need to downplay such goodie

79. ijuanp03

Posts: 669; Member since: Dec 30, 2014

My thoughts, exactly. I own the S10e and the fps is blazing fast. Like how MKBHD has shown in his S10e review. Still, PA insists that FaceID is faster when you can't even unlock your phone without looking at it.

20. jellmoo

Posts: 2660; Member since: Oct 31, 2011

This honestly looks to be the phone to beat this year. It's a super compelling package at a more palatable price. Definitely my favourite of the S10 trio.

27. Heisenberg

Posts: 378; Member since: Feb 11, 2015

Its expensive based on phonearena review.

68. luis.aag90

Posts: 278; Member since: Aug 12, 2014

The irony on that negative

32. libra89

Posts: 2317; Member since: Apr 15, 2016

It's pretty nice!

26. Einstein333

Posts: 146; Member since: May 22, 2012

How can a phone that only last for 7h in the battery test get a 9.2 rating?? This result alone would be a deal breaker for me!

29. alanrock

Posts: 327; Member since: Oct 04, 2018

they change that...lower is now better :)

38. ph00ny

Posts: 2069; Member since: May 26, 2011

Because their own real life experience doesn't match their crappy battery test that supposedly reflect real life usage "Our real-life experience shows that this phone will definitely last you a full day, even if it’s a longer one, and you should not be worried about the smaller battery size."

44. Fred3

Posts: 588; Member since: Jan 16, 2018

It actually last me almost the whole day before charging it again

51. worldpeace

Posts: 3135; Member since: Apr 15, 2016

Check any S10e battery test on youtube. It easily beat XR in all of them. And even beat XS Max.

65. adecvat

Posts: 659; Member since: Nov 15, 2013

Yeah, beat. With great S855 on board.

69. luis.aag90

Posts: 278; Member since: Aug 12, 2014

The review unit had the Exynos 9820

33. libra89

Posts: 2317; Member since: Apr 15, 2016

I have had the s10e for a few days now and I can generally agree with this review, especially when it comes to the fingerprint sensor and case situation. That has been kind of annoying to deal with and I'll like to find a case that is less annoying about this. Battery life has been fine for me though. Good review.

80. ijuanp03

Posts: 669; Member since: Dec 30, 2014

You should train your fingerprint in such a way when you use it, not when you just clearly "training" your fps. Try holding it like you naturally hold it. Like from your pocket or suddenly taking your phone from a desk or something. Don't train the same area of your finger, Deliberately train every corner of your finger.

35. User123456789

Posts: 1200; Member since: Feb 22, 2019

It is the simplest of the trinity but got higher score? Same price of iPhone Xr 64Gb, but called overpriced.

47. rouyal

Posts: 1583; Member since: Jan 05, 2018

It gets the basics right, compared to the other two.

70. luis.aag90

Posts: 278; Member since: Aug 12, 2014

What an irony isn't it? Somehow the wide angle camera, reverse charging, 3.5mm jack, better AMOLED display, and double the RAM and Storage are not enough value for the S10e to not be called overpriced

36. A_A_A

Posts: 229; Member since: Jan 23, 2017

In my opinion this is the best out of three S10 models. I only regret that FP scanner is placed too high and interface in general in spite of being fast still not very smooth. This is something Samsung always fails to do. And of course baterry life could have been better. Probably Snapdragon version will be better for battery life and I hope to see comparisons on youtube. Also hope Samsung releases firmware update which will fix battery life and overall smoothness of interface. Will be a good purchase starting from 650 USD and below.

39. Sparkxster

Posts: 1247; Member since: Mar 31, 2017

S10e is the best of the S10 trio just needed a bigger battery.

41. Rocket

Posts: 709; Member since: Feb 24, 2014

Cons: a bit too pricey, i dont remember seeing that on the iphone xr review? That's a con for all iphones, actually.

46. PRoChandra

Posts: 9; Member since: May 08, 2014

" I still don’t find it nearly as effortless and as reliable as, say, Face ID on iPhones." FACEPALM. I have seen iPhone users baming their heads into the wall in disco Clubs and restaurants or while standing erect on an empty street under street light. And I just unlock my cell with fingerprint effortlessly. No way that crappy FaceID goin to replace my reliable Fingerprint Scanner.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Galaxy S10e
  • Display 5.8" 1080 x 2280 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 10 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Octa-core, 2840 MHz
  • Storage 128 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3100 mAh

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless