Amazon Prime Day is starting soon!
Check early bird deals here
0 d
00: 00: 00

Nokia C3 Touch and Type User Reviews Back

Overall user rating

8.7

The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.

Battery
8.3
Call quality
9.2
Display
8.8
Reception
8.8
Text input
9.2
Build quality
9.8
Everyday usage
8.7
UI speed
8.2
Camera
8.8
Multimedia
7.5
Internet
7.8
Post new review

Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of PhoneArena.

ASARSAT posted on Jul 10, 2012, 11:47 AM
Posts: 0; Member since: May 26, 2012

9.0

Not Bad for its price ..

ASARSAT has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review

i'm using this mobile for 14 month . Not Bad for its price .. But touch is not very good i change it before .. screen is not scratch restaurant ..................................................​.............................

Build quality
10.0
Reception
8.0
Call quality
10.0
Internet
7.0
Multimedia
7.0
Camera
8.0
UI speed
8.0
Everyday usage
10.0
Text input
7.0
Display
9.0
Battery
10.0

Pros

  • good cover ( stainless steel)
  • long time battery

Cons

  • screen is not scratch restaurant ..
  • touch is not very good

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

Report

Leostaley posted on Apr 19, 2012, 6:44 AM
Posts: 0; Member since: Apr 02, 2012

7.0

Touch screen crapped out and...

Leostaley has owned it for less than year before publishing this review

This phone was mostly good while i had it. My carrier allows mms, but this phone would not accept picture messages. I had to find a new phone when the touch screen started malfunctioning badly after about 6 months. it always showed signs every once in a while of this issue, but then one day the touch screen registered only one in 15 touches, and when it did, most of the time not where you touched.

The phone was of great build quality and size.

Reception was poorer than my verizon phone, but that's because of carrier.

No complaints about call quality. But the screen blacks out and locks annoyingly fast on calls, so it's hard to see your call time, or press numbers for automated systems etc. Also annoying, it doesn't begin logging the call time until your call has been answered, so you can't see how long it has been ringing.

There wasn't much room on the phone for downloading programs, but I was able to download opera, which was an infinitely superior browser, and put it on the shortcuts on the front page. The phone was TERRIBLY slow, even if you were connected to a fast WIFI- I could never tell a difference between the WIFI and T-Mobile.

Media was a mixed bag. I was grateful for the 3.5 headset jack, now one of my required features. Music player was functional when you got to your files. The hard part was getting to them.The media player was pretty bad at arranging files. if you have a lot of files, you have to scroll all the way through your albums or artist names; there...  

Build quality
10.0
Reception
8.0
Call quality
8.0
Internet
6.0
Multimedia
4.0
Camera
8.0
UI speed
6.0
Everyday usage
4.0
Text input
10.0
Display
10.0
Battery
9.0

Pros

  • great keyboard
  • great battery
  • great build
  • (barely) usable music player.

Cons

  • Buggy UI
  • VERY Poor Media Organization
  • Such a Buggy UI that it became unusable

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Report

Fuifui posted on Nov 09, 2011, 5:41 PM
Posts: 0; Member since: Sep 05, 2011

9.0

nokia us quolity

Fuifui has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review

this is nokia with touch screen, it's innovative , but c5 has dual flash and better battery .but c301 is better than x302 which has no flash , but has navigation instead . so all in all buy this one if you are not stupid enough to own a smart phone , but still prefere interesting solutions .

Build quality
10.0
Reception
9.0
Call quality
9.0
could be better louder maybe ,
Internet
8.0
Multimedia
8.0
Camera
9.0
UI speed
9.0
Everyday usage
10.0
Text input
10.0
Display
9.0
Battery
7.0
acceptable ,but still quite week if compared to other nokia phones

Pros

  • Very good build quility
  • sleek +stainless steel+good size
  • very nice +practical 2.4 touch screen
  • 5mp camera , nice one
  • all apps are good
  • reasonable price

Cons

  • average battery
  • no micro sd and usb cable added
  • no navigation
  • single flash ,

Fuifui alternatives:

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Report

sravan242 posted on Apr 09, 2011, 11:14 AM
Posts: 0; Member since: Apr 06, 2011

10.0

A gud mobi in budget with all features nd its sleek also..!!

sravan242 has owned it for less than month before publishing this review

This mobi is a nice one, its sleek, 3g n wifi powered, and good camera, its having 5mp with led flash, nice design toooo.. this one is perfect for who dream abt havin a touch mobile and wantd a lot chattin. and its also havin a good reception. gud body build with metal.

Build quality
10.0
Reception
9.0
Call quality
9.0
Internet
9.0
Multimedia
10.0
Camera
9.0
UI speed
9.0
Everyday usage
10.0
Text input
10.0
Display
9.0
Battery
8.0

Pros

  • nokia touch
  • keypad
  • 3g, wifi
  • design
  • its sleek
  • camera

Cons

  • small touch screen 2.4' bt gud
  • slghtly battry

6 out of 7 people found this review helpful.

Report

arbaz posted on Aug 10, 2011, 10:46 AM

10.0

its very gud mobile

arbaz has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review

its very gud affordable and have very nice apps wifi isvery gud and gud metal body andis gud touch ..............................:) camera is also gud with flash and ui speed is also gud. call quality also very gud. its build quality is gud....... i will suggest u all to buy this one. :)

Build quality
10.0
Reception
10.0
Call quality
10.0
Internet
10.0
Multimedia
10.0
Camera
10.0
UI speed
10.0
Everyday usage
10.0
Text input
10.0
Display
10.0
Battery
10.0

2 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

Report

Max posted on Apr 25, 2011, 12:44 PM

7.0

Average phone not symbian...:(

Max has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review

its an average phone overall.but if ur budget is tight thn i prefr ths phone to u,but if u are looking for smart phone for business and good battery timing the plz dont waste your money on this....It is quiet sluggish sometimes.... although its bulit quality is nice but it is still not the best choice ...i suggest you to go for nokia e5 rather than this phone...it is sleek and stylish but i has alot of problems.....
Thank you :)

Build quality
9.0
Reception
9.0
Call quality
9.0
Internet
7.0
Multimedia
6.0
Camera
9.0
UI speed
7.0
Everyday usage
8.0
Text input
8.0
Display
6.0
Battery
6.0

Pros

  • Build Quality
  • Affordable
  • Nice Camera
  • Sleek
  • Metallic Body

Cons

  • Poor Battery
  • Sluggish
  • Difficult to get used to
  • touch screen is nt perfect in performance
  • hangs alot
  • poor browser
  • poor multimedia functionailty
  • average sound quality

3 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

Report
You must be a registered user to post a user review
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless