The changing face of Google Nexus brand

The changing face of Google Nexus brand
Some have commented that some of our coverage of the Samsung Galaxy Nexus has been too negative, and that certainly was not the intention. However, we do feel that there are some valid questions that need to be asked about the device and the path that Google is taking with it. Because, aside from whether or not the device is good or not, the handling of the device is a big departure from past Nexus devices, and we aren't sure if Google is controlling the experience properly, or how much Google is controlling it at all. The Samsung Galaxy Nexus is different from its Nexus descendants in a number of ways, and we want to look into what has been changing. But first, we need to start with what Nexus is, and what it should continue to be.

What Nexus is

Traditionally, the Nexus devices have had three main purposes in design:

  1. To be a pure Google Android experience.
  2. To be a developer reference device.
  3. To be a hardware reference for other manufacturers.

These are the main defining characteristics of a Nexus device. A pure Android experience is necessary and beneficial to the Android ecosystem as a whole because it creates a baseline for what the platform is and what it offers. Pure Android shows all of the features that make Android unique, and also serves to highlight how manufacturer customization benefits and harms the ecosystem. Custom UIs can add layers of polish and design spark, but will also serve to slow down device performance as well as software update times. Pure Android also showed how certain carriers were disabling standard features of Android, such as tethering or sideloading apps. 

Being a developer reference device is also about creating a baseline experience. It gives developers one device that will always have the fastest path to getting the newest update of the Android operating system. And, it is a device that is easy and hassle-free to unlock and root, so developers can get deeper access into the system and make sure their apps take advantage of what Android offers. 

Being a hardware reference device is a more ambiguous idea, but an important one nonetheless. Because there are so many devices in the Android ecosystem, certain hardware components and features will evolve simply by the process of competition. But, sometimes the ecosystem stagnates or takes a path that Google doesn't think is best, or is hesitant to adopt certain features. That's where the Nexus acts as a carrot to lure manufacturers towards certain features. 

The Nexus One pushed for more adoption of faster processors, AMOLED screens, LED notifications, and a secondary microphone for ambient noise cancellation. Some of these features were adopted (faster CPUs, secondary mics), some weren't (LED notifications). The Nexus S pushed for larger internal storage and less reliance on SD cards, front-facing cameras, NFC chips, and faster GPUs. Again, most of those features have become standard, with the exception of NFC. The Galaxy Nexus is pushing HD resolution screens, NFC (still), and no physical function buttons.

Unintended consequences

These basic characteristics of what a Nexus device would be had some unintended consequences. First, pure Android alienated more controlling carriers (Verizon, AT&T) because those carriers didn't want to give users free and easy ways to tether their phones to other devices, or install apps from any source. This meant that the devices were relegated to smaller carriers like T-Mobile, which were willing to take risks with more open policies, because they just needed more business. 

In turn, this alienated many mass market consumers because the Nexus devices weren't available on the most popular carriers, and could only be purchased outside of the traditional system. The Nexus One was the worst offender, being available only for purchase through Google's website. The Nexus S found a bit more success being sold in Best Buy and eventually Sprint stores, but it was still too limiting. Additionally, stock Android was not the prettiest OS, so simply the look of it turned off some more casual consumers, especially when viewed next to an HTC Sense device. In general, casual consumers either didn't know the Nexus devices existed, or they didn't understand the point of such a device. 

Consequently, the Nexus devices became synonymous with early adopters, the mod community, and hardcore Android fans in general. Only the most dedicated knew about the devices, why they were special, and why they were necessary to the Android ecosystem as a whole. As always happens with cult items like this, the hardcore community took something of ownership in the Nexus brand, and that brand is changing.

The Galaxy Nexus pivot

The Galaxy Nexus is the first Nexus device that is actively being marketed as a mass market device. This is not just a developer device, or an early adopter device, or a device for uber-geeks. This is a device for everyone. This new philosophy is shown not only in the UI overhaul of Ice Cream Sandwich, but in the advertisements for the Nexus, the selling price of the device in some regions, and its upcoming availability on Verizon. It is still a Nexus device, the trouble is that it's feeling less and less like a Google device because it seems that Google has had to cede more and more control in order to get this Nexus to a wider audience. We even saw that in the videos introducing Android 4.0 that Google posted yesterday show Galaxy Nexus phones where the Verizon branding on the back is by far the prominent logo.

Nexus devices have always been first and foremost Google devices. Google would partner with manufacturers in designing and producing the hardware, but at the end of the day you were left with the Google Nexus One and the Google Nexus S. There were no compromises made to the idea of a pure Android experience, and Google always felt in control, for better or worse. This tended to mean that the device would be a great piece of hardware and software that wasn't marketed well, and ended up with a limited reach.

Now, Google seems to be taking a backseat to everyone with the Galaxy Nexus. First and foremost, this is not a Google device, it is a Samsung device. It is not a descendent of the Google Galaxy Nexus, or the Google Nexus Prime. Rather, it is a cousin of the Samsung Galaxy line, the Samsung Galaxy Nexus. Those of us who dive more deeply into news and happenings will see the Nexus tag and understand what the device is and what it offers, but few casual consumers are likely to understand that this is a Google device, because Google's name is not on it. 

Making concessions

This may seem like a relatively small thing, because in our community we automatically connect "Android" to "Google" anyway. The trouble is that many casual consumers don't make that connection. That has been a major effect of Verizon's presence in the Android ecosystem. The DROID commercials have been the only iconic marketing campaign for Android that has resonated with consumers. The trouble is that because of this, it is common for many people to substitute the word "droid" as a blanket term for all Android devices, and connect the idea of droid to Verizon, not Google. All of this takes away from the primary reason for Nexus devices: to be a pure Google Android experience. As writers, we may believe it more than most, but words have power, and Google has ceded a lot by removing its name from this Nexus device. The name implies authorship, and this makes it seem like Google wasn't as big a part of the creation of this device as you would expect from a "pure Google experience" phone

The concessions go past just the name of the device of course. We had already seen with the Nexus S on Sprint that Google was willing to compromise on features in order to appease carriers. With the Nexus S a software update removed free WiFi hotspot and tethering capabilities in favor of giving control to Sprint. We're sure that free tethering and WiFi hotspot capabilities will not be part of the Galaxy Nexus, at least not on Verizon. We've also seen that there are at least two pieces of bloatware packed onto the Verizon Galaxy Nexus. Again, this is a small thing, but it adds to the list of compromises that Google has been making. Those two pieces of bloat add to the subjugation of Google. For many consumers, this will not be a Google Nexus device with a pure Android experience, it will be Samsung Galaxy device with Verizon branding. 

The biggest concession of all is one that we've talked about before, which is that Google has seemingly no real control over the release of the Galaxy Nexus. Google has made deals with carriers around the world to bring the Nexus to market, but those deals obviously have not included any kind of marketing campaigns. Google hasn't made any comments on the specific release dates or even specific carriers. We know that Verizon will have the Galaxy Nexus, but we still don't know when, or if that will be a full or timed exclusive. 


The Google Nexus line of devices is not the same thing that it once was. It used to be a study in a pure Google Android experience, and it still is a developer device, and shows the direction Google wanted the hardware to move. Because they were wholly Google controlled devices, they were a sort of spiritual flagship device for the ecosystem, and could never move past being a spiritual flagship because it had a limited reach from being outside of the traditional carrier system. Now, Google is increasingly taking a back seat with the Nexus to the point where the only thing that can truly be said to be Google is Ice Cream Sandwich. And, Ice Cream Sandwich is definitely pure Google, and looks amazing, however the handling of the Galaxy Nexus as a whole has us questioning who is in control.

Whether you like or hate Apple products or the way Apple has traditionally done business, Apple does not take a back seat with its devices, especially those considered to be "flagship" devices. Apple creates products to a standard and markets them well; that drives the success. Google makes products to a standard and assumes that will be enough to make them successful. And, when that failed, rather than creating better marketing and communication with consumers, Google ceded control of the device to carriers and manufacturers in hopes of getting it out to the masses. Google gave away the ability to build up its own name in the market for a chance that the established Samsung Galaxy name will lead to more success for this Nexus device. 

To be clear, Google's way may still work. We haven't seen the Galaxy Nexus in all markets. We haven't seen if there are holiday advertising campaigns planned. And obviously, we don't know if it will sell well or not. But, that's not the point of this discussion. The point is that Nexus devices are, above all else, supposed to be pure Google experiences, free from outside control. Google is supposed to be the author of its story. To push the literary metaphor, Nexus should be Google's Android autobiography, but with the Galaxy Nexus, Google has become little more than a ghost writer. That may lead to a more successful device that can legitimately be called the flagship Android device, but it also fundamentally changes what Nexus is, and it takes control away from Google. And, we don't know where that leads.



1. tacohunter

Posts: 408; Member since: Nov 06, 2011

First. Nice article

35. Synack

Posts: 688; Member since: Jul 05, 2011

I\'m sorry but this is a pure Google experience with LTE on top. Give me a friggin break, you can\'t call it a PURE Google experience because it has Backup Assistant and My Verizon apps? No, that\'s crap. Just because it\'s no longer an exclusive geek only phone that wasn\'t mega advertised (we still have yet to see commercials on the tube) doesn\'t mean it won\'t be pure Google. There are absolutely no skins or carrier bloatware (Backup Assistant and My Verizon isn\'t bloat) on this device. It IS pure Google. This isn\'t an opinion, it is a fact. This device is doing what Nexus has always done, just like you said; set the benchmark for hardware and software. It introduces new things that no other devices have like past Nexus\'s. Verizon won\'t have any control over this phone. The only control they might have is slowing down your stupid fast 4G LTE connection if you\'re in the 5% of people that download way too much. T-Mobile has been doing that for a while, where the first Nexus device was directed to, just like you said. Point is, this is Pure Google. Go back to your iPhone with 3G.

36. Synack

Posts: 688; Member since: Jul 05, 2011

And I have no idea why your website is putting backslashes before every single one of my apostrophes.

69. fervid

Posts: 183; Member since: Nov 22, 2011

Most likely Magic Quotes are turned on. Since this is an old feature and off in current PHP versions they are either running an older/less secure PHP or have it turned on manually. They could also be manually adding slashes with another function which is the wrong one to use for an HTML post and they should be using htmlentities.

62. Retro-touch unregistered

2. username

Posts: 25; Member since: Nov 05, 2011

i love nexus. i have a nexus one, nexus s, and definattly cant wait for the galaxy nexus.

3. MichaelHeller

Posts: 2734; Member since: May 26, 2011

I love Nexus too, and I'm definitely impatient for the Galaxy Nexus, but I'm not switching to Verizon for it, and I have no idea when or where I'll be able to get my hands on a T-Mobile version.

6. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

if there isnt a T-mo version, i would be highly surprised. we just need to force VZW to launch the darn thing so we can get past the exclusivity to find

7. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010

Many are buying the euro version. Maybe Amazon and others ship the unlocked version soon

20. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

has anyone fully confirmed HSPA+ compatibility with the euro version and Tmo USA?

21. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010

its said to be pentaband with ATT and tmobile bands on it

24. LewsTherin006

Posts: 140; Member since: Nov 18, 2011

yea, engadget tested it. it works on tmo and att.

30. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010


67. MichaelHeller

Posts: 2734; Member since: May 26, 2011

It's a pentaband radio, so that should cover everything.

60. ElectroManiac

Posts: 47; Member since: Sep 29, 2011

Any idea from where you can import the europe version?

61. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010

So far eBay. But my bet Amazon will have it soon and with US warranty

4. SoopaManLuv

Posts: 24; Member since: Aug 11, 2011

I'm still getting one. F all tha negative, I'm looking at it like this: my current phone is a DroidX. When I got it it was one of tha top dogs on Verizon. Far as I'm (as in ME) concerned, it will b tha best DROID on Verizon and I'm not into going backwards. U know, upgrade. Not down grade. Also, good article. Everything he said is true but most of us r like me and not really concerned about 2 pieces of bloatware or the "google" experience. We jus want tha damn phone! Bring it on!

5. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

I still contend that they should call the verizon version the Droid Prime/galaxy, instead of the galaxy nexus, to keep the distinction. we all also kinda kept our fingers crossed that VZW wouldnt act like VZW. I really had no problem with those 2 apps, as for verizon users, they are extremely useful and actually needed for the way that VZW's business has been set up for a while. It seems like a very small concession to get such a great device on the biggest carrier in the land. But, as our board member roscuthiii pointed out from another developer blog post, " Those two applications as has been confirmed on XDA ( are installed in the system folder. The only way they got into the system folder is if a modified version of what's out there for the AOSP on the GIT servers was compiled to include those two applications. Now on to my real concern...this *requires* that all new versions of android be filtered through VERIZON "----( Kirk Spencer) If that is the case, then I completely stand with you, michael. If that turns out to be much adue about nothing, then I think we are just getting hot n bothered over relatively nothing. To say that my opinion on the matter hinges on weather what roscuthiii pointed out turns out to be true or not.. would be pretty accurate.

9. roscuthiii

Posts: 2383; Member since: Jul 18, 2010

Aww shucks! Thanks for the cred, but I'm merely (unfortunately?) the messenger.

12. MichaelHeller

Posts: 2734; Member since: May 26, 2011

For a bit, I thought the same. I thought it would have been better with a Samsung DROID Nexus on Verizon, and a Google Nexus Prime for everyone else, but that just causes more problems and would lead to more calls that it was a type of fragmentation. Google needed a unified release for the device, name and all. Unfortunately, instead of taking ownership, and building Google's name in the market, now all the credit will go to Samsung, because it's just another Galaxy phone.

28. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

there is truth in that. well, every hand has 2 sides.. on the palm side, most of us like google's "hands off" approach to android for most things. On the reverse, we get mad at google not taking a more apple like control of the situation. Can we really have both? I would LOVE to see google flex that muscle and nearly 50% market position and push carriers a bit like Apple does... but then they wouldnt be the same company. As much as we want it, it seems like they are acting "googley" and doing what makes their partners "happy", and we are the hippocrits wanting both "hands off" and "more control".

31. MichaelHeller

Posts: 2734; Member since: May 26, 2011

Isn't that the point of Nexus? That gives us both. Google is hands off with everything else, but Nexus is all Google.

55. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

yea but it is and isnt. Its all google, but google went around the carriers to sell the phone without concession. the original nexus was an exellent phone for its day but it was a sales disaster because of that decision. they then tried to go around the carriers and sell it at best buy.. which was an improvement, but nowhere near what the phone was capable of. they are now... and unfortunately.. bowing to VZW at least slightly to get the phone on the carrier to go head to head with the i4s. i really want google to act like apple and punch VZW and ATT in the mouth and get them to listen, but thats not google's MO. Who has more pulling power than google? They OWN the smartphone market. iphone this and that, but google has 50% market share with Android. We cant have both worlds. U can either be an ass like apple, or be hands off like google. The only one that could possibly be in the middle is MS at this point, an they dont have the power/sway to try that. pardon if im slightly incoherent, as you may or may not have noticed, i was out celebrating with my friends n their engagement. :) hopefully it sounds well thought out. :)

63. MichaelHeller

Posts: 2734; Member since: May 26, 2011

Google may not strong-arm Verizon, but giving up the name of the phone to Samsung is unacceptable.

44. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

yeah..i never did like the Galaxy Nexus name nor was i a huge fan of Samsung making it again a second year in a row. i thought Motorola deserved their turn.

47. MNX1024

Posts: 13; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

In my opinion, I wish SE or SONY now made the new Nexus device. It'd be funny if they decide to call it Xperia Nexus.

56. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

the nexus is a showcase. who had something better to show case than samsung this year? i thought moto was gonna get it last time over samsung. guess we are all wrong. :)

70. vette21man

Posts: 351; Member since: Apr 06, 2011

Agreed, it should go to the best. Even the many-months old SGSII is winning "vs wars" with Motorola's brand new DROID RAZR, so to KingKurogiii, why does Motorola "deserve" their turn? Don't you need to EARN your spot? It shouldn't be willy-nilly given.

73. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

the only way the Galaxy S II is absolutely better is with Exynos the rest is either a win for the Razr or there's trade offs. Motorola has deserved a chance this whole time. there have been rumors of Motorola making the Nexus since the Nexus One. need i remind you who put Android into the spotlight? imagine a Pure Google Experience running on one of Motorola's greatly built handsets and tell me that wouldn't be a win. it would've been great if Motorola did this year's Nexus, Motorola has more experience with the OMAP4 and LTE, Motorola's build quality is pretty superb and the build quality is a big gripe with this Samsung Nexus and if they had gotten Samsung to supply them with HDSA displays for it then they would have made the ideal Android 4.0 Nexus.

71. vette21man

Posts: 351; Member since: Apr 06, 2011

Seriously, who cares about a distinct name? I would argue it makes WAY more sense to have a universal name across carriers. iPhone 4S doesn't need iPhone 4S AWESOME on AT&T, and iPhone 4S ASTOUNDING on's iPhone 4S no matter what carrier. They're the same phone, guys. I forget if the Galaxy Nexus will have both GSM and CDMA radios built in, but that would likely be the only possible difference, as all models should support LTE.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.