Tegra Note tablet runs up the score on the AnTuTu site

11. vincelongman (Posts: 5082; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)

This GPU is very very impressive, its supposedly faster than the Intel HD 4400/5000, which are used most ultrabooks.
Its about as fast as the Nvidia GT 620M/710M.

Here are some benchmarks from Lenovo’s ThinkVision 28 (at CES)
GFXBench 2.7 - 1080p T-Rex HD Offscreen
60 fps - Tegra K1
57 fps - Acer Ultrabook (i5-4200U (active cooling); HD 4400)
47 fps - HP Spectre 13 x2 (5-4202Y (passive cooling); HD 4200)
27 fps - iPad Air
24 fps - Note 3
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-Tegra-K1-SoC.108310.0.html

19. hung2900 (Posts: 965; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)

Gfx benchmark is not Intel GPU favourable.

22. vincelongman (Posts: 5082; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)

It's still really impressive from Nvidia since the TDP of the K1 will be ~2-5W (Intel's U CPUs are ~15W) and the K1 won't be fan cooled (Intel's U CPUs are fan cooled)

15. MySchizoBuddy (Posts: 158; Member since: 23 Aug 2011)

wait so the previous one flew off the shelves. when did that happen?

20. Finalflash (Posts: 3536; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)

This one won't either, it is all marketing and hype with a lot of lies in between as well. Those interested should read the article posted by Charlie Demerjian (or whatever) on semi-accurate.com about the K1 and how Nvidia is only showing the demo without power numbers because it is clocked out of its league on these prototypes and demos just to fake a good score. It is the same thing that happened with the Tegra 4 which was supposed to over power the other competitors but only if it was powered by a nuclear power plant.

21. renz4 (Posts: 319; Member since: 10 Aug 2013)

oh come on that is charlie. we know sometimes he right and sometimes he wrong but that guy is internationally known to have passion hatred towards nvidia.

17. Edmund (Posts: 656; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)

it runs android so it'll still be a pile sh!t.

7. afegit (Posts: 45; Member since: 12 Feb 2014)

Lol, dual core? its 2014 mate, anything less than A57 octacore exynos is not suitable for flagship phone. How are you going to multiwindow multitask with the puny 2 core like the iFone

12. darkskoliro (Posts: 1090; Member since: 07 May 2012)

Because I would rather have a 64 bit armv8 dual core than an almost 2 year old quad core A-15

13. afegit (Posts: 45; Member since: 12 Feb 2014)

brah i said A57. not A15
#rekt

14. iphoneplz (Posts: 10; Member since: 12 Feb 2014)

i do agree and dual is not the future anymore for smartphone and so i hope apple changes from dual to quad core

16. MySchizoBuddy (Posts: 158; Member since: 23 Aug 2011)

I bet you were the person behind the Megahertz Myth and then megapixel myth. All the benchmarks show the iphone A7 to be better than anything currently on the market. Go to anandtech for the full review.

18. UglyFrank (Posts: 1940; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)

Apple is only the king of performance because it is using an armv8 while everyone else is using armv7

8. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

I think you will see them in tablets before smartphones.

10. Insignificant (Posts: 192; Member since: 22 Sep 2012)

Qualcomm have been caught sleeping big time by Apple. And if the a15 k1 has decent power usage, it should best the s805. Problem is, it probably won't have decent power usage, and doesn't have integrated LTE. Also, companies like Sony release all the devices of the high end (tablets and phones) of the same period with the same chip. That way, that can update them together. It's unlikely for Nvidia to get many design wins, until denver arrives at least. And even then, depends on the power, though I wouldn't be surprised with RT tablets with it, not that anyone makes or buys those...

But we do need the competition. And Tegra on a smaller die should be good, and what they're doing with the GPU is truly revolutionary, and could have big implications in the future.