Qualcomm seeks to ban the AT&T and T-Mobile Apple iPhone X, iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus
by Alan Friedman / Nov 30, 2017, 6:01 PM
With today's suit, Qualcomm accused Apple of using five patents without obtaining the proper licensing. The intellectual property involved is related to cellular connectivity, power efficiency, and 3D imagery on the Apple iPhone 7, Apple iPhone 7 Plus, Apple iPhone 8, Apple iPhone 8 Plus and the Apple iPhone X. Qualcomm is asking the court for an injunction that would prevent Apple from selling the GSM version of the 2017 iPhone models because those do not feature the Qualcomm made modem chip inside. In other words, the AT&T and T-Mobile variants of the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X are the phones that Qualcomm wants the court to ban. Oh yeah, Qualcomm is also seeking unspecified damages and court costs.
Qualcomm filed the suit with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. As we previously mentioned, Apple is getting a little pissed off and reportedly has been designing the 2018 iPhone models to run without Qualcomm's modem chips. Instead, speculation has Apple turning to Intel (the company that currently supplies the part for GSM flavored models) and MediaTek.
So how is this going to end? Every time Apple sneezes, Qualcomm sues and vice versa. Eventually, we'd imagine that some of these suits will have to be consolidated. We wouldn't be surprised to see both sides try to settle all of these suits.
source: Scribd via AppleInsider
Posts: 30786; Member since: Feb 05, 2011
If they succeeded, cnour and bucky would drop dead on the spot.
posted on Nov 30, 2017, 7:01 PM 9
Posts: 2305; Member since: Sep 11, 2014
This will be bad for AT&T and T-Mobile not for Apple.
posted on Nov 30, 2017, 10:17 PM 0
Posts: 1740; Member since: Feb 10, 2009
I thought if you pay for a part you get to use it. This just a big facad I would imagine. At some point it’s about how much money sombody is getting. I am sure Qualcomm wants Apple to sell its phones. If it gets the right amount of money. All these years of Apple squeezing more money out of there phones and now they seem like they are getting a tasting there own medicine.
posted on Nov 30, 2017, 7:14 PM 2
Posts: 987; Member since: Jun 22, 2017
Interesting statement and souce from the patent suit document: "Apple's founder boasted that Apple "steals" the great ideas of others—specifically, that "we have always been shameless about stealing great ideas."2 Apple employees likewise admit that Apple—a relatively late entrant in the mobile space—did not invent many of the iPhone's features. Instead, Apple incorporated, marketed, and commercialized the work of others: "I don't know how many things we can come up with that you could legitimately claim we did first..We had the first commercially successful version of many features but that's different than launching something to market first." https://www.embedded.com/print
posted on Nov 30, 2017, 8:53 PM 2
Posts: 41; Member since: Jan 22, 2014
If I'm understanding this correctly, Qualcomm is suing Apple because the models with Intel chips are using Qualcomm patents that they haven't paid licensing fees for. That seems fair, if not a bit petty. The Intel modems kinda suck anyway. It's why the T-Mobile and AT&T versions have such weaker signal quality over the Verizon version. Even on WiFi.
posted on Nov 30, 2017, 8:59 PM 2
Posts: 692; Member since: Oct 08, 2011
Age old argument. Innovation VS invention. Apple has openly admitted innovation. Steve Jobs never said he invented the touch screen. It sure is better than the capacitive display on the Samsunsung Omnia 2 I had!! This is where fan boys, (“boys” being the operative word) can’t get it.
posted on Dec 01, 2017, 5:33 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):