New Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 3D renders envision Google's phones from all sides
The renders are made to fit the leaked dimensions of about 145.3 x 69.3 x 7.8 mm (8.2 mm with the camera bump) for the Pixel 2, while the XL 2 is clocking in at 157.6 x 76.3 x 7.9 mm (8.6 mm with the camera bump), claims the source. The larger phone may seem pretty big if the "bezel-less" concept picks up steam and wide user adoption, but let's not get ahead of ourselves, and wait to see what Google will really unveil this fall.
source: @onleaks & MySmartPrice
Related phones
- Display 5.0" 1080 x 1920 pixels
- Camera 12.2 MP / 8 MP front
- Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, Octa-core, 2350 MHz
- Memory
- Storage 128 GB
- Battery 2700 mAh
- Display 6.0" 1440 x 2880 pixels
- Camera 12.2 MP / 8 MP front
- Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, Octa-core, 2350 MHz
- Memory
- Storage 128 GB
- Battery 3520 mAh
20 Comments
1. rebretz
Posts: 95; Member since: Dec 26, 2011
If the dimensions are accurate and the rumors of the smaller Pixel having a 5 inch screen again then Google is going the wrong way with the bezels. The Pixel 2 is taller than the OG Pixel. And since they also made it thinner they better not skimp on battery like Lenovo just did with the Moto Z2.
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 5:47 AM 0
6. Myphoneisonfire
Posts: 403; Member since: Sep 05, 2016
76.3mm for the XL 2 ? It should be having a 6.6 inch display
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 6:09 AM 1
2. AronWunarso
Posts: 242; Member since: Feb 21, 2016
Woah, dual speakers!
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 5:49 AM 9
10. vincelongman
Posts: 5585; Member since: Feb 10, 2013
The XL 2's bezelless display + dual front facing speakers is really impressive. Correct me if I'm wrong, no one has done that yet right?
Disappointed with the lack of headphone jack and camera bump?
The Pixel's teardrop shape was a great way to hide the camera
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 8:12 AM 4
8. Oğuzhan_77
Posts: 112; Member since: Nov 18, 2013
just funny, just funny. This desing on 2017. Disgusting...
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 7:15 AM 0
9. cocoy
Posts: 450; Member since: Oct 30, 2015
RIP 3.5 mm jack. Headphone jack is more important than dual stereo speakers. No one is going to play and listen to music using that dual stereo speakers in public.
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 7:45 AM 6
14. Scott93274
Posts: 6025; Member since: Aug 06, 2013
I was wanting the smaller Pixel, but I was disappointed to hear that it was keeping with the same design as last year's phone (Referring to bezel size). But after looking at the renders, it still looks to have been reduced quite a bit compared to last year's Pixel. I am so excited for a smaller phone with flagship specs!
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 10:10 AM 0
15. smoked_2na
Posts: 84; Member since: Mar 15, 2017
Waiting on a new phone for Project Fi. If they remove the headphone jack, I'm switching back to TMobile.
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 11:01 AM 0
16. Scott93274
Posts: 6025; Member since: Aug 06, 2013
Well, the next Moto X is supposed to be available for Google Fi. Just an option.
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 11:41 AM 0
17. dmsrfl
Posts: 75; Member since: Sep 21, 2012
Front facing stereo speakers! I hope these are accurate because I didn't upgrade my Nexus 6p to the Pixel mostly because I hated that the Pixel didn't have front stereo speakers. Plus of course those huge front bezels are horrible. I can live without a headphone jack... I rarely use it anyway. I'll definitely be ready to pre-order if this is the final design.
posted on Jul 26, 2017, 3:54 PM 0
18. Skizzo
Posts: 401; Member since: Jul 14, 2013
I don't understand the no 3.5mm jack thing. I really don't. I've heard every argument there is, and none are even remotely justified in my opinion, while others are laughable. If you don't use it, fine, it still doesn't hurt to have it there as an option. It doesn't affect waterproofing, the "extra cost" of adding it is infinitesimal and laughable, and the room it takes up is far too minimal for that to be a valid enough reason, but having more functions/options is ALWAYS better than having less. Blutooth, while conveniently wireless, does not provide the same audio fidelity as a wire, it's that simple, so why not just give the end user the option to use whichever they prefer?
