New 5.2-inch Motorola XT912A with Android 4.4.3 spotted in benchmark test?

New 5.2-inch Motorola XT912A with Android 4.4.3 spotted in benchmark test?
Motorola already confirmed that it would introduce a second-generation Moto X (possibly called Moto X+1) later this year, plus other new smartphones, but it didn’t provide specific details regarding their specs - although we do know that they will offer a near-stock Android experience.

One of the company’s upcoming handsets might be the Motorola XT912A, which was spotted in a GFXBench test today (see the image on the left, and zoom in for a closer look). According to the benchmark test, the XT912A runs the latest Android 4.4.3, and sports a 5.2-inch display with 1080 x 1920 pixels. Other features seemingly include a 12MP rear camera, 2MP front-facing camera, quad-core Snapdragon 800 processor, 2GB of ROM, and 32GB of internal memory.

If the XT912A model number looks familiar it’s because the original Motorola Droid Razr (released by Verizon in late 2011) was - and still is - known as the XT912. Is this XT912A a new Verizon-bound handset? We can’t know for now. In any case, we must keep in mind that data revealed by benchmark tests isn’t always accurate, as these things can be easily faked. So the XT912A might end up being... nothing after all. Until some official details arrive (if ever), we have no choice than to remain skeptical about all this. 

source: GFXBench via The Droid Guy

FEATURED VIDEO

30 Comments

1. mmmanuuu

Posts: 403; Member since: Nov 05, 2013

Ok…. .

6. akki20892

Posts: 3902; Member since: Feb 04, 2013

Phone customization + Android customization = Android Phone

26. sgodsell

Posts: 6897; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

I think the author of the article meant to say 2gb of ram instead of ROM. Unless the ROM is for the OS only? Either way Motorola release it soon. Also make moto maker available to people in Canada, or give users the ability to order it and then ship it from the states to Canada. I would pay a little extra for that ability.

2. Chris_Bakke

Posts: 246; Member since: Jan 23, 2013

Guys, it doesn't have a barometer. We can all go home. Nothing to see here.

4. rihel_95

Posts: 305; Member since: Mar 21, 2012

Sarcasm?

15. AliNSiddiqui

Posts: 382; Member since: Sep 19, 2012

Sheldon?

19. Chris_Bakke

Posts: 246; Member since: Jan 23, 2013

Yes, it is. Thank you for pointing it out for all the other people who don't see it as well.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGSA_VvONGs

20. StanleyG88

Posts: 240; Member since: Mar 15, 2012

Does Android have a native Altimeter? I know some apps have them.

30. sgodsell

Posts: 6897; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

It doesn't have a native altimeter app, but there are a number of apps on the play store that have an altimeter option. Some are flight apps and are great if you have an ultralight.

3. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

it's probably a Droid and those specs are what i'm talking about! i wouldn't opt for this though. since i have the Galaxy S5 i'm counting on Motorola to present me with a smaller alternative more like the Moto X from last year which i still love.

5. Lauticol

Posts: 404; Member since: Jun 25, 2011

I think Moto should stay in the 4.7-inches range for the flagship! They should have some Moto U phablet (or whatever name they want) but don't change Moto X size!

9. Kamehameha

Posts: 44; Member since: Apr 21, 2014

Yeah. People can make 5.5" 1440p display but can't make a 4.3" to 4.5" 1080p displays. We really need someone to make take all the technological advancements and use it to miniaturize our phones.

13. tech2

Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012

Good point. We've started seeing QHD displays on a 5.5. Its about time 1080p comes to 4.5 or less. Besides HTC One already achieved that at 4.7 last year. BTW, nice name.

28. bighandssmallpockets

Posts: 99; Member since: Dec 13, 2011

Amen! We want top of the line specs in a smaller package! I have a tablet for when 4.7 is too small and a TV for when the tablet is too small. KEEP PHONES PHONE SIZED!

7. fanboy1974

Posts: 1345; Member since: Nov 12, 2011

Looks like a downgrade/no improvement from my Note 3. Man I wanted a Motorola device this year. At least put the snapdragon 801 and 3 gigs of ram in there.

10. NexusPhan

Posts: 632; Member since: Jul 11, 2013

A moto running the 800 w/ 2GB will out-perform a touchwiz Note 3 every day of the week.

22. BattleBrat

Posts: 1476; Member since: Oct 26, 2011

When I went from my razr to the HTC One m8 this week I tried out an s3 my razr buried it.

11. skinny95black

Posts: 113; Member since: Jan 06, 2013

Do you think the 800 is wortless compared to the 801 you should remember that the 800 is the former strongest processor by qulacom he still pack alot of power and can rivel the 801 in power and speed beside putting it in means more affordable price than putting 801 and since it uses near stock android it will run very fast with this

25. sgodsell

Posts: 6897; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

You have to remember the graphics engine (GPU) is the same GPU for the 801 and the 800. They both use the adreno 330. What has changed are clock and bus speeds. Also things like dual channel ddr3 ram is supported in the 801.

14. AfterShock

Posts: 4146; Member since: Nov 02, 2012

Not a downgrade, an opponent from another OEM, another choice if you may. With less fluff on board, she may rival your phone sans fancy stick option. 801 is an over clocked 800, The hot new ones are 805 an 810 later in year. 801 is a filler soc for the time being.

27. Suo.Eno

Posts: 556; Member since: Feb 17, 2013

"The hot new ones are 805 an 810 later in year." 810 it is and that's because that'll be proper generational change. 805 will be a lost cause on all current 800 users for obvious reason(s):- They just won't see/really feel that straight to the forehead performance loss especially those already running on near AOSP custom ROMs.

16. DRO_ID

Posts: 40; Member since: Feb 20, 2014

I'm guess that's a Snapdragon 800 plus their additional cores like that of the Moto X, so technically that's really not that bad.

17. AfterShock

Posts: 4146; Member since: Nov 02, 2012

That be pretty kick arse if it had the additional smart cores along side a full quad this time.

18. DRO_ID

Posts: 40; Member since: Feb 20, 2014

Yeah, so they really don't need to go with the latest quad out their, and it still would probably out perform the latest.

8. StanleyG88

Posts: 240; Member since: Mar 15, 2012

But is the camera a camera since most Moto cameras are not cameras.

12. lauremar

Posts: 181; Member since: Feb 29, 2012

This will be the next Droid... The follow of the X will be X+1 and entirely different than this one.

21. surethom

Posts: 1618; Member since: Mar 04, 2009

Let's just hope Motorola / Lenovo are not stupid this time & release it quicker in UK & launch the 32gb version & not just the 16gb version.

23. fzacek

Posts: 2486; Member since: Jan 26, 2014

Verizon better not screw this up...

24. Planterz

Posts: 2120; Member since: Apr 30, 2012

You know they'll lock that bootloader down tighter than your first prom date's legs.

29. Taters

Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013

Should have kept it at 4.7 and made it even more compact than the moto x.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.