Moto X4 leaks explained: two distinct phones, each with modular backplate support

Motorola leaks have been dominating upcoming smartphone news these past couple days, as images started forming what looked like an exciting picture for the company's near-term lineup. As we compared these new leaks with older ones, and started looking closely at what they revealed, an interesting theory began to emerge: was Motorola about to bring back its old laptop-style docks with the help of a big connector this phone's back panel? According to Evan Blass, the truth is far more complicated – and interesting – and what we're looking at here are actually two new Moto handsets, each supporting an all-new modular backplate hardware expansion system.

Let's back up for a sec and look at yesterday's big leak: we saw both that white handset, identified as the supposed Moto X4 and featuring that rear connector interface, as well as a darker model, presumed to be the same phone. According to Blass, that was our big mistake.

Instead, those two are reportedly two distinct phones, and while they may be outwardly similar, the internals are quite different.

We'll touch base with the rumored specs of each in a moment, but right now we want to dwell on their physical similarity. That's supposedly quite intentional, so that they can share snap-on backplate modules called “Amps” that will deliver extra functionality – in the same ballpark as what LG's doing on the G5, but supporting multiple models right out of the gate.

These Amps would interface with the phones through that connector array, and it sounds like Motorola has some compelling options lined up: Amps that give their attached phones stereo speakers, extra battery life, a pico projector, camera grip (with optical zoom, no less), and rugged case (with its own wide-angle camera enhancement) are supposed to be available at launch time – and we could easily see that selection grow.

As for the phones themselves, launch names are still under debate, but they're reportedly being developed under the codenames Vector Thin (the black render) and Vertex (the white render).

Vector Thin is the one with the flagship-caliber specs, including a 5.5-inch 2,560 x 1,440 (quad HD) OLED display, top-shelf Snapdragon 820, 3GB or 4GB of RAM (Motorola loves customization options), 32GB storage, and a 13-megapixel camera with optical stabilization. And while the phone would only get a 2,600mAh battery, it could be a shockingly thin handset, measuring in at just 5.2mm thick.

Vertex would dial things back a little to another 5.5-inch OLED panel (but this time with a lower 1080p resolution), Snapdragon 625, 2GB or 3GB of RAM, 16GB or 32GB of storage, and a laser-assisted 16MP camera. It would end up with a beefier 3,500mAh battery, but measure in at 7mm as a consequence. To be fair, that's still incredibly svelte for all we're talking about packing inside.

What about launch plans? While August 24 (the date you see on-screen here) had been kicked around before, another compelling theory suggests that Lenovo could turn the spotlight on both these handsets and their Amps accessory system at Lenovo Tech World on June 9.

source: VentureBeat



1. ihearlivepplz

Posts: 80; Member since: Jul 06, 2015

Such an ugly front :/ Esoecially the white. That home key is an eyesore and the capacitive keys also.

2. havoc

Posts: 95; Member since: Jan 08, 2015

awful photoshop on the front fingerprint scanner

3. aegislash

Posts: 1531; Member since: Jan 27, 2015

That rear camera is just...yikes. It's like they took a Moto 360, built it into the rear, and added a camera, with flash in the flat tire.

4. Johnnokia

Posts: 1158; Member since: May 27, 2012

Why don't they add a stero speaker, larger battery, and better camera to the actual phone instead of those silly "Amps"?

19. Chidoro44

Posts: 52; Member since: Feb 03, 2015

Probably because no one is making money on their hardware but apple. It's a way to make money on higher margin add-ons without bogging down the phone with things that could be considered unnecessary for phone buyers. I don't care about stereo speakers, it's a waste of space, weight and cost. Extra battery power, great. Camera with zoom, interesting. Would I commit to a zoom camera phone out of the box, not likely

5. zeeBomb

Posts: 2318; Member since: Aug 14, 2014

Ehhh not a FAn of the design

7. bossman

Posts: 264; Member since: Jan 27, 2016

What is that circular module to the right of the speaker?

8. Romantico3pe

Posts: 180; Member since: Sep 14, 2015

Oled = fail

20. Chidoro44

Posts: 52; Member since: Feb 03, 2015


21. Chidoro44

Posts: 52; Member since: Feb 03, 2015


9. TrackPhoneUser

Posts: 256; Member since: Oct 21, 2015

Who asked for these features?

10. KingSam

Posts: 1505; Member since: Mar 13, 2016

the back is nice and unique but the front is UGLY. that bottom bezel plus 5.5 inch display. and why does the lower end model offer a 16mp camera with laser autofocus and a better camera?


Posts: 1168; Member since: Oct 05, 2015

The cam may not be better. Personally, the specs may be swapped around a bit. But I'm excited for a legitimate SD625 phone finally. Hope there's a decent looking back with battery for the white one

16. Bankz

Posts: 2550; Member since: Apr 08, 2016

Having a 16MP camera doesn't make it necessarily better than the 13MP one. The 13MP one actually has OIS, laser AF, and phase detection AF with bigger problems pixels..

17. Bankz

Posts: 2550; Member since: Apr 08, 2016

Lol.. Bigger Pixels I meant. Btw, why does phonearena not have an edit botton on their site?


Posts: 1168; Member since: Oct 05, 2015

At the same time, perhaps the 16 MP cam could be comparable, as gsmarena states it'll have pdaf as well. Also, I think the reason why the hi end one has a smaller MP count is because of how thin it is

12. yoosufmuneer

Posts: 1518; Member since: Feb 14, 2015

Lenovo is Killing Motorola

13. aznhachi

Posts: 212; Member since: Apr 12, 2016

seems to be

14. NoAllegiance unregistered

I'm sorry 2600mAh??? Lol, Good thing there is modular battery packs. They seem to be using their competitors mistakes. HTC M8: Unusually big chin with logo ✓ Samsung S6: Small battery ✓

22. Veteater

Posts: 59; Member since: Aug 04, 2015

None of which had modular anything. Moto X 4th gen: huge ass chin but great phone otherwise. Stock Android, shatterproof, etc... Modular, not gonna be a clunker with the modules cuz the damn thing is 5 mm thick. Small battery with battery module= #TBE battery life. Most will get this through Moto maker anyway. Tiny speaker between pins w/stereo speaker module= probably really good sound given the use of Dolby speakers on higher end Vibe smartphone, and the really good sound from motos over the past 2 years. I hate the chin, but I would not let that stop me from purchasing a smartphone with this capability and everything else I want. Even with the large chin, still a pretty good looking device. Maybe the fingerprint scanner cover should be as large as those on the competition to fill up more of the chin, so that the chin doesn't look too big because the scanner is too small. The chin is about as big as the Moto X force but the device looks more balanced than that phone, so when it gets released we should be OK. At least this doesn't look generic like this Oneplus 3 that will come out around the same time. Also notice the size difference in the fingerprint scanner between the two, and the moderately smaller bottom bezel the Oneplus contains.

15. hiseshu

Posts: 38; Member since: May 09, 2016

Any information on "moto x force 2".. ? I m seriously waiting/looking for" moto x force 2"

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.