Legere: T-Mobile's message responsible for surge in customers, not the Apple iPhone
posted by Alan F. / Sep 09, 2013, 1:48 PM
Legere says that it was T-Mobile's message, of being the "Un-carrier" that brought customers to the carrier, and kept the ones that were already there from leaving. T-Mobile stopped subsidizing the cost of new phones with higher wireless costs. T-Mobile also started its JUMP plan for those who want to upgrade their phones more often. So far 700,000 customers have signed up for the program, which was eventually copied by Verizon and AT&T.
Yes, things are looking up for T-Mobile, led by the outspoken Legere who has become a media darling starting with his comments calling AT&T's network "crap" during CES. "The postpaid phone net adds for T-Mobile exceeded those of AT&T, Sprint and Verizon (added) together," the CEO recently said. "To me, that’s one of the strongest statements you can make about a quarter." In addition, for every two T-Mobile customers leaving, the operator is bringing in three new customers from AT&T and Sprint.
Last quarter, iPhone sales represented only 21% of T-Mobile's smartphone sales, a number Legere calls "healthy." Although the CEO doesn't credit the iPhone for the carrier's surge in the second quarter, Legere still expects to do plenty of business with Apple in the future.
source: AllThingsD via AppleInsider
Mxyzptlk: No, the iPhone is solely responsible. The true answer more than likely lies somewhere in between the two.
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 1:59 PM 7
Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010
Prior to adding the iPhone, T-Mo was hemorrhaging customers. After adding the iPhone plus making non-trivial additions to their LTE footprint, T-Mo starts increasing its customer count. As you posted, the truth is somewhere in between. I think the iPhone was a significant factor, but not the only factor. I don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t buy the claim that the \\\\\\\'message\\\\\\\' was the reason for the improvement, however.
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 2:15 PM 1
All the \"un-carrier\" thing did was switch from \"contract\" to \"financing\". I would think getting a phone/platform they were missing would have more to do with holding onto customers than changing the semantics of their service. They certainly didn\'t improve their network, that would have saved a lot more customers.
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 1:59 PM 2
I guess adding 116 LTE markets doesn't count as improving their network.
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 2:02 PM 10
Posts: 7; Member since: Jun 28, 2013
\"All the \"un-carrier\" ting did was switch from \"contract\" to \"finaincing\". As opposed to the other carriers who include the subsidized cost of phones in your rate plan, whether you upgrade or not. A least with T-Mobile, you don\'t pay for a new phone if you don\'t get a new phone.
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 3:57 PM 0
Posts: 36; Member since: May 03, 2013
Actually, T-Mobile owes their surge in sales to AT&T\'s failed bid to acquire them because of the stipulation that if AT&T couldn\'t buy them, T-Mobile would make $2 to $3 billion dollars which allowed T-Mobile to update their garbage network so in when the CEO called AT&T\'s next program \"crap\", he should have thanked AT&T for making T-Mobile\'s \"crap\" network better! Apple played a part in it but in no way made T-Mobile\'s network grow!
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 2:27 PM 2
Posts: 9; Member since: Jan 14, 2013
It was definitely the no contract and the cheaper prices that made our family decision to switch to Tmo. iPhones? What are those?
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 2:39 PM 3
Posts: 108; Member since: Nov 26, 2009
Agreed! The no contract, lower prices and unlocked phones were HUGE switching factors for me, while the iPhone did play a small percentage in retaining and bringing in customers. Overall, Tmobile heard the customers plight and responded right on point. Don't regret leaving at&t at all.
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 2:52 PM 1
The price, no-contract plans and promise of a rapidly-improving network were what sold me. The iPhone? Never owned one. The truth is that it's probably a combination of the revamped plans and the availability of the more popular phones. Overall, if the network is bad, it will not matter if t mobile has the latest phones.
posted on Sep 09, 2013, 5:02 PM 1
Posts: 2000; Member since: Apr 16, 2011
I hate to say it but T-mobile has a really stupid business model. Why use t-mobile when you can use MetroPCS and save $ each month. It's the same network, same phones, but it's cheaper at MetroPCS. Go figure.
posted on Sep 10, 2013, 1:36 AM 0
Posts: 1243; Member since: Sep 08, 2012
What you\'re saying doesn\'t make any sense because: 1. (pre-aquisition) There were some people that didn\'t want a contract plan. So MetroPCS was a go. 2. They are not the same network (completely) 3. T-mobile has better phones than MetroPCS. MetroPCS\'s phone lineup actually started getting better because of T-mobiles aquisition recently. 4. It depends on what you wnat/have. Not everybody has the same type of pockets. So I don\'t think they have a stupid buisness model especially if they\'re gaining customers.
posted on Sep 10, 2013, 3:14 AM 2
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):