Larry Page repeats denial of Google involvement with PRISM, calls for more transparency

Larry Page repeats denial of Google involvement with PRISM, calls for more transparency
Google was quick to deny any involvement with the NSA's PRISM program, and especially any ideas that Google had built a "back door" for the government to grab user data, but CEO Larry Page wanted to reiterate that denial and add a few more details to the mix. Not only is Page denying any Google involvement with such a program, but he's also calling for more transparency in these matters.

Page assures users that no government has access to Google servers and Google data, and says that no one at Google had even "heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday." Page reiterated that Google only provides data "in accordance with the law" (although in the Patriot Act era, PRISM could very well be lawful), and commented directly on the Verizon reports:

Of course, Page also found the time to pat Google on the back over its Transparency Reports, before calling for more transparency overall:

source: Google Blog

Story timeline

FEATURED VIDEO

11 Comments

1. darkkjedii

Posts: 30693; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Larry is lying his butt off. Everyone who denies involvement, is deeply involved. Google has notorious spying/collecting issues in from the past...they're involved.

2. darkkjedii

Posts: 30693; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

And yes apples involved too, they're just as bad as google.

3. HASHTAG unregistered

So, in other words, if I came to you and accused you of stealing my phone, or anything w/ value, and denied it, but of course I wouldn't do a such thing, I'm lying? That's pretty much what you're saying.

7. darkkjedii

Posts: 30693; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Hash just watch. It'll come out, and this isn't to rag on google either. We're gonna be shocked at just how many companies are involved.

4. Zero0

Posts: 592; Member since: Jul 05, 2012

Actually, there's a small part of me that says he's sincere. Google did try to take away National Security Letters (information requests with a gag order). They failed, but they tried. It's in Google's best interests to make sure that its users' information is private. Otherwise, people stop using Google services, stop seeing Google ads, and Google stops making money.

5. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Yes, Larry is lying his butt off. Google themselves publish a report that says how many times they have responded to subpoenas for data. The FISA court order is a subpoena, so Google has by its OWN admission provided data pursuant to the subpoenas.

6. darkkjedii

Posts: 30693; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Exactly. Denial is often the first line of defense. This will also have an impact on glass.

8. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

How will it have an impact on Glass?

9. darkkjedii

Posts: 30693; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Places wanting to ban it from the premises

11. roscuthiii

Posts: 2383; Member since: Jul 18, 2010

Subpoena's are limited in scope pursuant to the specifics of a case. What PRISM is/was is an entirely different animal. And yes, Google has always been forthcoming letting people know just what authorities have been asking of them.

10. madpiyal

Posts: 108; Member since: Feb 11, 2013

Are you trying to be smart by bending truth Mr. Page? I thought you are better than Schmidt, but seems like you are as evil as your mentor. How can we trust your words for transparency when in the same speech you are blatantly lying about Google's involvement with the Govt.????

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.