Judge Koh makes more rulings in advance of trial, rules Jobs' statements to biographer inadmissible

Judge Koh makes more rulings in advance of trial, rules Jobs' statements to biographer inadmissible
With the Apple-Samsung trial scheduled to start July 30th, Wednesday saw Judge Lucy Koh tie up some loose ends by making a ruling here, a ruling there. For example, in a ruling that favored Apple (as most of them did on Wednesday) the Judge said that comments made by the late Steve Jobs to his biographer were an "inadmissible distraction" and she also limited testimony about Apple's Chinese manufacturing situation in an effort to exclude any talk about the tech titan's problems involving  Foxconn and the latter's alleged human rights violations.

Judge Koh is obviously concerned about presiding over a speedy trial. She ruled that Korean based Samsung would have to reduce its list of the 192 witnesses that its lawyers wish to call to the stand during the trial. Judge Koh called Sammy's request "not realistic" and reminded both sides that they each are limited to a maximum of 25 hours of witness testimony each. Both Apple and Samsung agreed to keep the jury verdict form down to 8 to 12 pages from the original 40. In an interesting piece of news that we can heartily applaud, the Judge said that exhibits from both companies would be made public. That includes design and marketing documents that Apple and Samsung had both asked to keep secret. Only third party source code will be sealed.

One piece of good news for Samsung came from a ruling made by the Judge that limits Apple to discuss Samsung's "questionable tax status" in the States, but the Cupertino based firn will not be allowed to discuss any claim of tax avoidance on Samsung's part. Apple has been requested by the Judge to limit its claims against Samsung to keep the trial moving at a quick pace. Apple had tried to get a Temporary Restraining Order on the sizzling hot Samsung Galaxy S III, the one handset that might be considered a true Apple iPhone rival, but was denied. Meanwhile, the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1 is under an injunction, preventing sales, while there is a stay on the injunction on the Samsung GALAXY Nexus as a Federal Appeals Court works things out. The latter is back on sale at the Google Pay Store with Android 4.1.1 installed, after a software update removed the offending local search feature from the phone.

source: electronista

Related phones

GALAXY Tab 10.1
  • Display 10.1" 1280 x 800 pixels
  • Camera 3 MP / 2 MP front
  • Storage 32 GB
  • Battery 6800 mAh
  • Display 4.7" 720 x 1280 pixels
  • Camera 5 MP / 1.3 MP front
  • Processor TI OMAP4460, Dual-core, 1200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB
  • Battery 1850 mAh(12.00h talk time)



1. Ohrules

Posts: 327; Member since: Jun 11, 2012

i'm seeing more of Koh these days than i want to :|

2. doubler86

Posts: 320; Member since: Jan 26, 2011

I really can't stand how much she favors Apple when every other judge in the world has threw out Apple's pathetic claims or overturned the poor rulings that were made in Apple's favor.

7. Mxyzptlk unregistered

Every other judge didn't want to do what's right.


Posts: 97; Member since: Jul 08, 2012

more like she was bribed... when the world other company hates there business practises along other company. stealing patent which dosnt belong to them ... the way u talk suits ur avatar with along with ur name suits ur personality. rooten fruit. brainwashed. cowards. cant compete. and try banning . dont like cometition if only the whole world finds out what Apple a the company is everyone will start hating. and then there u are still supporting the bad guys. personally do u have pride diginty selfrespect in u... looser. get a life.

3. mas11

Posts: 1034; Member since: Mar 30, 2012

She uses that wheel not logic to make her rulings lol

4. Adithya7184 unregistered

she got money from Apple...That's why she is supporting apple....lol

5. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

Those statements are inadmissable? What the flying f**k? Koh should be removed from the bench. She has no business presiding over this case.

6. Mxyzptlk unregistered

That's not your call. I'm sure her credentials speak more than your words.

8. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

And her actions speak louder than yours. Nice to see you again, sunshine. Where have you been hiding all this time?

9. Mxyzptlk unregistered

Her actions is her job. I don't hide. I just don't comment here often.

10. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

So her job is to make rulings which cripple Samsung very valid case that this patent war is the result of Steve Jobs's personal vendetta, and not because of any harm done to Apple?

11. Ohrules

Posts: 327; Member since: Jun 11, 2012

are you two thumbing down each other's comments?


Posts: 97; Member since: Jul 08, 2012

ni one here likes u... u allways get red. ur another Taco and that chicken gallitoking.


Posts: 97; Member since: Jul 08, 2012

her actions are bribed. she no longer has humanity in her sole. unlike British judges were justice is a place.

22. bayusuputra

Posts: 963; Member since: Feb 12, 2012

I heard he's been hiding under Koh's skirt and meditated till he turned into a Troll-faced monkey. Sigh, one is a chicken (gallito), one is a cat (taco) and the other one is a monkey (this joker).. iNimals..


Posts: 97; Member since: Jul 08, 2012

ur avatar represents Troll face and half human

24. piggypigs

Posts: 12; Member since: Jul 21, 2012

Well, throwing out the statement of the one who started it all .... it does leads to a lot of questions.

23. thinking

Posts: 130; Member since: Jan 19, 2012

In this particular case, I think she is right about inadmissible parts. What jobs says to his biographer or tax issues, etc, are out of topic. It's a patent fight, right? So, just get the patents and see if they are being violated. If possible, also see if the patent should be there at all. If not, abrogate that patent. Sadly, I don't think these judges are abrogating the generic patents, esp of apple.

25. piggypigs

Posts: 12; Member since: Jul 21, 2012

If it is about tax issues, then yes. But about his desire and intend to start a war, i.e. go "thermo nuclear on" google? It relevance is clear as clear blue sky on a cloudless mid summer day.

27. thinking

Posts: 130; Member since: Jan 19, 2012

Not true... and not fair... Just because jobs said he would kill someone doesn't mean he should be booked for murder when that someone dies. Mere intent cannot eb used to prove guilt. the case should be tried based on facts of the case. Simple.

12. Zayuh24

Posts: 149; Member since: Nov 21, 2011

I stopped caring about Judge Koh, because whatever bs ruling she delivers, Samsung will just go to the Federal Court of Appeals and get it overturned. She's obviously biased and ignorant to the fact that almost all of Apple's patents are common-sense to the tech world.

17. iamcc

Posts: 1319; Member since: Oct 07, 2011


13. sbr999

Posts: 79; Member since: Jun 05, 2012

Why is such an ignorant judge allowed to well... judge these things?


Posts: 40; Member since: Nov 24, 2011

The verdict is already baked, the results would be in favor of apple, and guys just bear in mind, its LUCY KHO's court

26. piggypigs

Posts: 12; Member since: Jul 21, 2012

it is her court, until the time for appeal and escalation to higher court. so she does have to justify her rulings.

20. roscuthiii

Posts: 2383; Member since: Jul 18, 2010

Well, there you have it... if you are ever going to do something questionable, have your statement of intention printed in a biography. This sets the precedent that professed premeditation isn't admissible. Way to go Koh. If there's anything to be held in contempt in your court, it's you. Given her history, she seems about as unbiased as Florian Mueller is.

21. TheRetroReplay

Posts: 256; Member since: Mar 20, 2012

She is the only judge in the world that favors Apple, all the other judges have been calling Apple out on their BS. Apple is either bribing her or she's just an fan

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.