ITC to re-examine one out of four patents HTC accuses Apple of violating

ITC to re-examine one out of four patents HTC accuses Apple of violating
Back in October, an ITC judge ruled that Apple did not infringe on four patents held by HTC relating to power management and phone dialing. On Friday, the ITC announced that it would take another look at one of the four patents. This means that the books are closed on the remaining three patents. HTC filed the countersuit back in May 2010, accusing Apple of using the patents in producing the Apple iPhone, Apple iPod and Apple iPad.  Apple had started the litigation with a complaint against the Taiwan based manufacturer. 

A final ruling on Apple's complaint against HTC is scheduled for this Monday after being postponed this past Wednesday. The original decision in that case was that HTC violated a pair of Apple's patents. When the original ruling was made in July, it was feared that it could lead to a ban on Android devices in the States. A spokesman for Apple repeated the company line  on Friday by saying, "competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours."

Both Apple and HTC have various complaints lodged against the other with the ITC. In July, Apple had filed another complaint against HTC while the latter filed its third complaint against Apple in September, using patents given to the company by Google. In his biography, it was mentioned that the late Steve Jobs took a keen interest in his company's legal actions against HTC, feeling like the Taiwan company stole Apple inventions. HTC CEO Peter Chou called the whole thing "a distraction", positive that it will not affect HTC's business.

Apple and Samsung also have a similar legal tangle going on worldwide. Recently, a U.S. court refused Apple's request for a ban on Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablets while a patent infringement trial is in progress.

source: Reuters via AppleInsider



1. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

HTC could be hanging on by the slimmest of threads, but if they win, Apple could have a real problem. Break out the popcorn and get comfy.

2. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

I smell an Apple bribe.

3. LewsTherin006

Posts: 140; Member since: Nov 18, 2011

Candy coated apples? those are good!

5. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Candy-coated apples and popcorn - yumm! (Thumbup)

4. 14545

Posts: 1835; Member since: Nov 22, 2011

"competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours" Apple should learn the definition of the work irony. We all know apple hasn't used anybody elses ideas. *cough* copy & past, voice services, multitasking *cough* Maybe apple should try and innovate their way back to the smartphone lead.

6. tacohunter

Posts: 408; Member since: Nov 06, 2011

Couph, couph. Voice services is copy pasting others ideas? I just discovered a week ago my 2006 phone has got a voice service: push to talk. Couph, couph. And when is multitasking of apple exact the same as android or others. It's totally different multitasking system then for example ICS. Even wp got a multitasking system. It's not because one got an idea others cannot use it. It's like saying the company that first got the idea of making an tv should only may use that idea. At least you should've talked About apple stole the notification system idea. Then you were, right. Althouth I saw this idea also on symbian. Couph, couph.

7. bruisingfour

Posts: 10; Member since: Dec 17, 2011

yes, I completely agree with you..on some counts. just because you thougt of an idea shouldnt mean you are the only one that can use that idea, as long as you implement it in a different way. however patents should also not be awarded for blatently generic things either, like for example Apples patent to unlock a touch screen device by moving a picture...the only way you can unlock a touchscreen without having a phisical key to do it.

8. tacohunter

Posts: 408; Member since: Nov 06, 2011

Well thank you for your comment. I totally agree. Some things that they patent are just weird, and should not be patented. But apparantly the patent system grants that. But this guy (14545) was talking about that apple copy pasted multitasking and voice services. First they have something completely different multitasking and voice service then their competitors. Obviously that guy didn't knew what he was talking about.

9. audiblenarcotic

Posts: 114; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

Hunter (I refuse to call you taco, haha) I think what he was actually trying to state was that copy& paste was a feature that they stole, not that they copy and pasted other features. It was part of the list of things he was saying. That being said, something as generic as copy and paste isn't something that should rightfully be patented. Then again neither should slide to unlock. So i guess by the same standards that slide to unlock is considered an apple pattent then they should also be at fault for stealing the patents on copy and paste and other stupid things. Either way I think most of this patent litigation is ridiculous. Motorola and Nokia are probably the only ones who actually have real patents infringed on and its from pretty much all other companies. Having said all of that, I hope that Apple loses every single patent war that they are involved in because they are the ones who started all of this nonsense in the first place. You reap what you sow. A.I.

10. tacohunter

Posts: 408; Member since: Nov 06, 2011

What should something as simple as copy paste be patented? Every computer got copy paste. This guy also talked about multitask and voice service steal also. So he didn't knew a single thing he talked about. It's not that you see one stupid patent that all their patents are stupid. Google also made a patent of an unlock feature so you're info is low if you can't compare to others. Or do at least some more research.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.