HTC EVO 3D Unboxing

HTC EVO 3D Unboxing
The eagle has landed, and boy the timing couldn’t have been any better considering that it has been a full year since the HTC EVO 4G made its debut on Sprint’s lineup – ushering in the era of 4G goodness like no other. Not only that, but it has continued to be one of the most talked about phones in recent memory seeing that it’s filled to the brim with chock-full of great hardware. Although it’s not presented as its true successor, the HTC EVO 3D is nonetheless an improvement in many aspects, but more importantly, it brings the notion of 3D to the masses – all of which will cost you $199.99 on-contract when it’s released June 24th.

Strangely, not a single photo or image of the handset is seen on any portion of the packaging, but instead, we find imprints of the “EVO 3D” name and recognizable capacitive touch buttons directly on the front of the box. Besides that one distinguishable mark, there isn’t necessarily anything alluring with the all-white packaging. The secondary box that the handset is sitting on is indeed colorful, but underneath that, we’re only treated with the bare set of included accessories – these include the documentation, microUSB cable, and wall charger. Admittedly, we were hoping for just a bit more than the usual suspect of items – especially when this is the HTC EVO 3D we’re talking about.

Needless to say, the original HTC EVO 4G was a beastly sized phone and didn’t quite beat out the design of the HTC HD2 before it. With the HTC EVO 3D, it still shares some of the EVO 4G’s design characteristics, but as a whole, it’s mainly less bulky feeling in the hand. Still constructed out of plastic, it combines a rigid pattern and soft matte touch coating in the rear to give it a good clean feel in the hand. Nevertheless, we have seen better industrial designs on other HTC handsets, but as a whole, it’s a decent improvement over the EVO 4G. However, it’s worth noting that the kickstand is now gone – meaning, you’ll have to prop it against something if you want a hands-free video watching experience.

One year later, we find some remarkably improved hardware under the hood. For starters, it’s sporting a 4.3” qHD Super LCD display that employs a parallax barrier overlay to offer 3D-viewing with no glasses; much like what you find with the Nintendo 3DS. Additionally, it sports two 5-megapixel auto-focus cameras in the rear with dual-LED flash for standard and 3D video recording in 720p. Powering the handset, it’s running a 1.2GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8660 processor with a 1GB of RAM and an Adreno 220 GPU. Already, we can see that this is indeed a workhorse, but it also features 4G WiMAX connectivity, 1.3-megapixel front-facing camera, DLNA, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, aGPS, and Android 2.3 Gingerbread with the most up-to-date Sense experience.

Starving for this one already? Well, we’re going to be testing this one out extensively to see where it stands on the totem pole – especially when we’ve seen some top-notch Android smartphones released already this year. Expect our in-depth review!

Related phones

  • Display 4.3" 540 x 960 pixels
  • Camera 5 MP / 1.3 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon S3, Dual-core, 1200 MHz
  • Storage 1GB + microSDHC
  • Battery 1730 mAh(6.00h talk time)



1. damienh28

Posts: 49; Member since: Dec 23, 2010

So sexy i cant wait to get it its definantely the hottest phone if it was on Verizon or AT&T people would not be saying o 3d a gimmick theyll be supporting it, But look how fast it powers up

2. Allday28

Posts: 347; Member since: Nov 19, 2010

So you gonna say that on every site? The Galaxy s2 blows this thing away..

5. damienh28

Posts: 49; Member since: Dec 23, 2010

Spec wise there pretty close, Power wise S2 wins no lie, but lets be serious which would you rather show off, Iphone sucks but its so elite becuase its simple and neat looking, GS2 is so tech savy and only phone geeks care about it, The EVO3d is so mouth droping, But your right the Gs2 is better but blow away no

7. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

to be honest i say the EVO 3D and Galaxy S II are completely opposite on the raw power front. the EVO 3D and the Sensation have proven to be on the bottom in terms of power while the Galaxy S II still reigns undefeated. realistically this phone isn't that special, 3D is still at a gimmicky stage of development and if you don't want to take it from me read Engadget's review.

9. damienh28

Posts: 49; Member since: Dec 23, 2010

dude I guarantee you Verizon is working on a 3d phone, Every phone will have 3d in the near future how is it a gimmick. First Evo 4.3 4g Android Front facing camera. Thats innovation what happens. Droid X 4.3 screen Iphone Front Camera. Sprint Innovates and what happens every phone from then on out is using these ideas. 3d will be apart of everyday life stop hating that verizon didnt do it first. Look now Lg making a dualscreen phone Sony also. EVO stands for evolution and its definantely doing that to all smartphones bro

10. damienh28

Posts: 49; Member since: Dec 23, 2010

The Thunderbolt is the EVO on Verizon right or wrong

13. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

you're right, i i mentioned that in my comment before i even read your comment.

45. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

Thats true...but what was on Sprint that was equal to the Droid 1 when it launched...Until the EVO, Sprint was behind with decent Android phones.It took until mid to last year for all the other carriers to start having more than 1 decent Android phone. Verizon had the best total line up for a while.

62. thatguy unregistered

i think your forgetting that sprint, verizon and at&t rejected the idea of an android phone when it first came out...if it werent for t-mobile theres a good chance we might not even have these awesome handsets...thats just talking about the U.S.....oh and just in case you might ask which phone, well none other than the mighty htc g1.

63. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

lol...thats true. Which is wild why it took so long for decent Android phones to be on T Mobile.

12. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

i don't care if Verizon is making a 3D phone. they're probably working on getting HTC to make them a version of the EVO 3D like they did with the EVO 4G, if i wanted one i wouldn't be concerned about it not coming but stereoscopic screens just aren't friendly to my sensitive eyes and that's really the only feature that stands out with the EVO 3D, the rest has proven to be under par and unless you just want to flaunt the first 3D phone then it's really not going to be that alluring compared to the Photon 4G which will be the more powerful phone on the Now Network until the Galaxy S II arrives in one form or the other.

15. damienh28

Posts: 49; Member since: Dec 23, 2010

Not going to lie your a smart guy, you know phone, Your right i like the EVO 3d becuase the idea is cool, one question is the stereoscopic screen going to damage my eyes

16. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

why thank you. if you want to experience something similar before the EVO 3D comes out you can go to your local Best Buy and look at the Nintendo 3DS.

31. richardyarrell2011

Posts: 510; Member since: Mar 16, 2011

Your Photon 4g will not be better than the Evo3d nor will it out perform the Evo 3d that will never happen. They will share the same network which is a plus but don't get it TWISTED the flagship device for sprint is the Evo 3d and will always be. The whole entire evo brand represents sprint so take your Photon 4g and fake galaxy within and go on a lonely highway and jump between cars.

37. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

..but it does. i'd feel the same way if we were talking about a Droid but that's simply not the case here guy. the EVO 3D is fast but it's a long shot from being the fastest, that's fact. if you don't believe me look for yourself. PA themselves just posted their Benchmark results.

41. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

even Verizon had a short period of having a Flagship device that wasn't a part of it's most advertised brand which was the Thunderbolt. no big deal.

43. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

You should just get an iPhone.....they way you carry on about the EVO and Sprint you would fit in quite nicely with the fanboys on that side...

47. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

i give credit & criticisms where it's due.

54. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

That post was meant for richard...the evosprintwimax fanboy.

57. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

oh! mahhhhh baaaaaaaaaaaad! o:

35. tigermcm

Posts: 861; Member since: Sep 02, 2009

it may be a lil lame but you forgot Sprint came out with dual screens now LG is doing the same for someone

39. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

Kyocera came out with the dual screens, not Sprint, they're a carrier and Sprint was gutsy to decide to carry that phone.

42. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

There were 3D Android phones over seas last year....The LG 3D already launched...might launch in the US before the EVO 3DI willl give FFC on Android phones to the EVO. I'm willing to bet it was also already out overseas. Dont feel like checking right now. But...FFC has been done years before the EVO and iPhone.The phone size was on Win Mo before the EVO...HTC HD2 and probably on Android phones overseas...I would say HTC innovates. Sprint is only the carrier.The EVO was/is a nice phone...but just like with most phones...when one starts fact checking one finds out just how unoriginal a phone is..

44. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

And one 3D phone was made by Sharp...

50. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

Scratch the LG launching in the US before the EVO Sites are saying LG 3D is the first glasses free Android phone....thats not right. It was either Sharp or somebody else overseas last year.

55. TOdoubleD

Posts: 114; Member since: Mar 28, 2011

You should move overseas.

61. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010


30. richardyarrell2011

Posts: 510; Member since: Mar 16, 2011

Yeah ENGADGET'S REPORT WAS TOTALLY APPLE FANBOYISH JUST LIKE YOUR COMMENT. I can go tell you to go read Walt Mosberg at Wall Street Journal, or go read Bonnie Cha at Cnet or go check out Bob Kovac over at AS WELL as and All these stated sites DO PROPER REVIEWS WHY???Because they want people to understand what they are purchasing and want people to know exactly how the device preforms not based on some personal feelings...Legitimate sites are not even posting honest reviews cause it takes days with a device before you can tell the general public how the device works and performs...You as well as Engadget at best are Idiots

38. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

i'm not even an Apple fan boy, the only Apple product i've ever owned was an old iPod Nano and it was a gift. Engadget are the most critical reviewers, if you want to get down into the nitty gritty about the phone's overall worth then Engadget is the place to go. what's the difference between a "proper" review and one based on personal feelings? all reviews no matter where you find them are going to post personal reviews by their editors or whoever they get to do them. oh and sites like Wirefly are generally going to be softer on their reviews because they sell the phones too.

29. richardyarrell2011

Posts: 510; Member since: Mar 16, 2011

Galaxy S2 is a JOKE....You will never see any updates on that device...How easily we forget...Evo 3d will rule android

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless