Galaxy S9, Note 8 and A7 (2018) chipsets tipped: Exynos 9810, 9610 and a hexa-core 7885

Samsung announced the Exynos 8895 chipset in the Galaxy S8 as a member of its Exynos 9-series, even though it is coded with the number eight still, so a true Exynos 9xxx is yet to hit the tape. This may all be changing soon, though, as a leakster with a proven track record of outing mobile processors before they are announced, has posted some info on an eventual Exynos 9610. 

Still built on the 10nm process as the Galaxy S8 chipset, the 9610 is said to land with four powerful Cortex-A73 nodes, clocked at 2.4 GHz, and four frugal Cortex-A53 ones for the mundane tasks, accompanied by a Mali-G71 graphics subsystem. This seems to be an upgrade of the 8895, perhaps with a second-gen 10nm process, allowing for higher frequency and with more powerful GPU. Could it be the one to power the Note 8? There have been rumors it may come with a beefed up processor indeed.

Another upcoming Samsung processor that the source tips, is the Exynos 7885 - this one is built on a 14nm node, and has two A73 and four A53 cores, clocked at 2.1 GHz, and again flaunting Mali-G71 graphics. The Exynos 7885 is apparently for the Galaxy A7 (2018), which leaked not long ago courtesy of a benchmark site with exactly the clock frequency listed. 

Last but not least, the source mentions that it won't be the Exynos 9610 that will go into the Galaxy S9, but rather a mysterious Exynos 9810, whose specs are still to be revealed. Given the rumors that Samsung will be moving to the 7nm process for the S9 and Note 9, the 9810 might differ from the 9610 in exactly this important metric - the die shrink - and 7nm should bring an even more powerful and frugal Exynos than this year's generation.



1. Medoogalaxy

Posts: 232; Member since: May 25, 2017

Samsung queen of technology, the other juste followig !

4. Jacksie66 unregistered

Nice attempt at trolling but you lost a point for that horrendous spelling..

9. trojan_horse

Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016

Damn, at least cut him some slack. :)

17. sgodsell

Posts: 7514; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

Samsung should be using the newer Cortex-A75 and A55 cores. Which are not only faster, but more power efficient as well.

13. TechieXP1969

Posts: 14967; Member since: Sep 25, 2013

KING...not Queen!

19. GoTstan

Posts: 386; Member since: Jul 25, 2015

Queen? So 2nd place then?

22. joeytaylor

Posts: 957; Member since: Feb 28, 2015

Not necessarily

2. nikhil23

Posts: 489; Member since: Dec 07, 2016

I'm loving my S8+.. Note 9 would be my next device

20. GoTstan

Posts: 386; Member since: Jul 25, 2015

Why tho? Why go through phones so quick

25. tedkord

Posts: 17452; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

That'll be a year and a half between. What's wrong with that?

3. torr310

Posts: 1690; Member since: Oct 27, 2011

Love Samsung CPU, but hate the curved screen and 2:1 ratio. Will jump ship to other manufacturers!

16. joeytaylor

Posts: 957; Member since: Feb 28, 2015

Love the aspect ratio .....much better than the 16:9

5. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

Another stupid numbering... Did they use lotto machine to name their processors?

6. Spyro

Posts: 334; Member since: Mar 29, 2017

This just makes me yawn to be honest.

8. dazed1

Posts: 806; Member since: Jul 28, 2015

Because you are a non tech user, otherwise....

14. Spyro

Posts: 334; Member since: Mar 29, 2017

Or maybe because I'm not the type of person who orgasms over silicon chips

15. BuffaloSouce unregistered

Then why bother to read the article and comment on it

23. jasrockett

Posts: 127; Member since: Oct 05, 2011


27. HansP

Posts: 542; Member since: Oct 16, 2011

You created an account on a tech site to let everybody know you're bored with technology? Desperate for attention? :)

7. Tipus

Posts: 899; Member since: Sep 30, 2016


10. Slytherin

Posts: 268; Member since: Mar 02, 2017

Bring it Sammy as i said before i'd be over the moon if you put a faster better cpu in the Note 8!

11. abdoualgeria

Posts: 928; Member since: Jul 27, 2015

No mali g-72 this is not a flagship soc

12. R-vjn

Posts: 301; Member since: Jan 07, 2013

Their hardware tech is amazing but with stupid software they are amazing at making their hardware look mediocre..!!!

26. tedkord

Posts: 17452; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

And yet, their phones are the number one rated in the world, three years in a row. I guess that makes everyone else sub-mediocre.

29. R-vjn

Posts: 301; Member since: Jan 07, 2013

It depends..! IMO, I just adore their design and hardware but totally despise their software and day to-day performance.

18. jeroome86

Posts: 2314; Member since: Apr 12, 2012

It's a good tech company but no need to drop on your knees. Let's keep it clean here.

21. GoTstan

Posts: 386; Member since: Jul 25, 2015

Here in the us we don't see this SoC so who gives a toss

24. Trex95

Posts: 2383; Member since: Mar 03, 2013

Sine there's no higher single core score 2500 or atleast 2500 including faster storage than UFS 2.1 and new ram ddr5 no go.

28. medicci37

Posts: 1361; Member since: Nov 19, 2011

So many fanboy losers on this site

30. pendragon0202

Posts: 164; Member since: Feb 23, 2015

I am waiting for Samsung's own gpu which will arrive next year. First one would not be for flagships may be for A series but soon they will make gpu for their flagship chips.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.