x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Fuhu showcases an insane, 65-inch Android tablet with a 4K display, a Tegra X1 processor, and 4GB of RAM

Fuhu showcases an insane, 65-inch Android tablet with a 4K display, a Tegra X1 processor, and 4GB of RAM

Posted: , posted by Chris P.

Tags :

Fuhu showcases an insane, 65-inch Android tablet with a 4K display, a Tegra X1 processor, and 4GB of RAM

If you thought that Samsung's 12.2-inch Galaxy Note Pro tablet was enormous (and trust us, it is), then Fuhu's new line of Android tablets will come across as downright nuts.

Showcased at CES 2015, the California-based company's new slates start out at the imposing 32 inches, all the way up to the massive 65 inches, with 43- and 55-inch models in the middle. And we're not talking about one of those massive, but generally under-powered, touch-enabled slabs you see in game rooms (or a museum), but instead a full-fledged powerhouses. 

Indeed, even the two smaller versions (32'' and 43'') come with 1080 x 1920 resolution displays, Nvidia's mighty Tegra K1 processor, 2GB of RAM, a 2-megapixel camera for video-conferencing, and connectivity options such as an HDMI slot (so IPTV), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and NFC. The larger models, however, are even more impressive, and will rock the even more powerful, octa-core Nvidia Tegra X1 chips with a 256-core Maxwell GPU, plus more than generous 4GB of RAM. But that's not all – the 55-inch and 65-inch also come with 4K resolution displays. Hook up a controller, or a mouse-and-keyboard combo, and you've got yourself a full-fledged Android experience on a monumentally large, TV-ready screen. Pretty cool if you've got a relatively large pile of cash laying around.

Yeah, that's right – these won't come cheap, and that's not surprising. The 55-inch model costs $2,499, while the 65-in giant will go for $4,000. Prices for the smaller models remain unclear.

source: Fuhu, PC World

19 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 08 Jan 2015, 04:20 1

1. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


FHA just literally s--t all over the competition with this announcement lmao.

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 04:23 4

2. tech2 (Posts: 3487; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)


65 inches of Angry Birds awesomeness ! /s

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 09:16

14. garlic456 (Posts: 251; Member since: 24 Dec 2012)


You would buy a $4000 50 inch tablet to play angry birds?
You really should look at this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQh_DisWIq0

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 09:39

16. elitewolverine (Posts: 5192; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


The blurr was horribad and there was no on screen touch...

posted on 10 Jan 2015, 10:36

19. garlic456 (Posts: 251; Member since: 24 Dec 2012)


There was no blur at all! I owned this phone for a year and it was really useful. Watch other videos there, like this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_mk9DP762g
How can you say no to that?

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 04:42 3

3. SIGPRO (Posts: 1938; Member since: 03 Oct 2012)


Does it have 4K or UHD resolution?

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 04:47 4

5. wargreymon (Posts: 763; Member since: 05 Nov 2013)


UHD is part of the term 4K.

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 05:09

9. SIGPRO (Posts: 1938; Member since: 03 Oct 2012)


4K is officialy not UHD. Manufacturers gave UHD resolution the name 4K.
But they are not the same! This is the same thing what happened years ago with HD ready and HD, 720p 1080p, people with no knowledge of this get's screwed!

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 06:02

10. Exempt1 (unregistered)


4K = 4096 x 2160

UHD = 3840 x 2160

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 06:20

12. SIGPRO (Posts: 1938; Member since: 03 Oct 2012)


I forgot to include it in my previous post. Thanks

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 09:37

15. elitewolverine (Posts: 5192; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


By the standards of HD, 480p in considered HD...

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 17:34

17. tyger11 (Posts: 198; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


'Official' according to who? My understanding is that there is a family of 4K-ish resolutions, of which UHD is one, and the most common because it's a simple doubling of the dimensions of 1080p 16:9 content.

There are a lot more 4K family resolutions than 4096x2160, too (which is actually "DCI 4K").

The one that really interests me is the 5120x2160 21:9 resolution - I'd really like for that to become more common.

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 04:43 2

4. SaintHelena (banned) (Posts: 397; Member since: 05 Nov 2014)


This is the real tablet for KING/QUEEN. You need a concubine to hold it up while you use it.

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 04:48

6. wargreymon (Posts: 763; Member since: 05 Nov 2013)


Had this been OLED it had been pretty cheap actually.

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 04:54 1

7. phljcnth (Posts: 498; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


That's already a board not a tablet! Anyhow, that may prove to be useful in many areas like education and corporate. I see a big market for this kind of device.

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 05:08

8. aryanfr1 (Posts: 125; Member since: 24 Jan 2013)


What! All the power of nvidia X1 coupled with 4Gb ram in a 65 inch tablet. This was the least I was expecting. Well that's massive! come-on someone bring it on a mobile device or a tablet, Let's wait for benchmark.

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 06:20

11. kaikuheadhunterz (Posts: 1157; Member since: 18 Jul 2013)


Hehe 4K display for $4k...

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 22:48

18. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 2288; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)


What's wrong with that,? I payed $6k for my samsung 65" 4k tv....

posted on 08 Jan 2015, 07:00

13. greenelektron (Posts: 537; Member since: 10 Sep 2014)


There should be a pen that goes with this. This can be used in class rooms

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories