California agrees to hold off on enforcing its net neutrality law until appeals court weighs in

California agrees to hold off on enforcing its net neutrality law until appeals court weighs in
When California Governor Jerry Brown signed SR822 at the end of last month, his signature made net neutrality the law in California. But even before the ink was dry on the Governor's signature, the Trump administration sued the state with Attorney General Jeff Sessions calling it "an extreme and illegal state law attempting to frustrate federal policy."

The FCC voted last December along party lines to repeal the Obama-era net neutrality rules. These rules were designed to force ISPs and wireless carriers to treat all content streams the same. In June, the FCC officially removed the rules from "the books," which would allow carriers to set up paid fast lanes for content streamers. While Californians might be eager to get net neutrality up and running again, and while the law is supposed to take effect in January, a report from Tech Crunch says that it could be months before net neutrality is enforced in the state. California's state attorney general Xavier Becerra says that it is better to wait for some of the legal issues to be decided first.

Becerra is talking specifically about a suit filed by 22 state attorneys general, some organizations and Mozilla (the company behind the Firefox browser) against the FCC. The suit asks for the FCC's repeal of net neutrality to be overturned. The California attorney general feels that the state will have a better idea about the legal challenges its new law faces after this case is decided. Oral arguments start on February 1st, and the case is being heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

The author of California's net neutrality law, Senator Scott Wiener (D-CA) says that while he would have preferred to see the law go into effect right away, he understands the rationale behind attorney general Becerra's decision. The Senator states that once the DC Circuit appeal is decided, "the litigation relating to California’s net neutrality law will then move forward." For his part, FCC chairman Ajit Pai says that the decision by California to delay enforcing its net neutrality law means that the agency has a strong case against the state.



1. TheOracle1

Posts: 2340; Member since: May 04, 2015

You don't have a strong case Mr. Pai. You have lobbyists money in your pocket you sleazeball.

2. JMartin22

Posts: 2387; Member since: Apr 30, 2013

Even if California was able to get all the federal courts to side with it on this issue, the FCC would just take this all the way to the Supreme Court; and since the SC has a Conservative majority on the bench and are beholden to corporate interests; California’s law would be struck down.

3. Scott93274

Posts: 6040; Member since: Aug 06, 2013

Your statement makes me want to punch something.sigh... So there are currently 4 judges on the Supreme court that were put there by Republican presidents who failed to get the majority vote in their elections, therefore the court does not reflect the will of the people, but it's not like what I say will matter at all...

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.