Apple Watch: All the official images

posted by Chris P. / Mar 09, 2015, 1:26 PM

After announcing its first wearable, the Apple Watch, alongside its new iPhones back in September last year, the Cupertino company is now finally ready to sell the gadget. As all things Apple, they won't come cheap, and will cost you anywhere between $349 to over $10,000, depending on the model you choose, at least from what we're told. You've got a pick between three different models, all of which come with a choice of bands, including leather, steel, and fluoroelastomer.

If you've been eyeing the Apple Watch for as long as we have, you'll probably benefit from having another look at the elusive thing before deciding if a trip to the nearest Apple Store is in order. So, we went over to Apple's dedicated Watch page, and grabbed any and all design images the company had up for shows.

Take a look!

Official Apple Watch images

View more + 41 images

FEATURED VIDEO

Options

17 Comments

1. arch_angel

Posts: 1651; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

Its just so damn ugly. i really just don't understand how apple would make such a ugly watch, when all there other devices look so good.

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:28 PM 5

4. Rorschach

Posts: 83; Member since: Apr 26, 2013

Sorry, I disagree. Not an Apple fan, but this looks just as neat as the moto 360.

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:30 PM 1

6. ihavenoname

Posts: 1693; Member since: Aug 18, 2013

Doesn't look too bad on wrist, better than Gear watches but worse than G Watch R and 360 imo.

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:34 PM 0

13. arch_angel

Posts: 1651; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

it doesn't hold a candle to the 360 or the g watch r/urbane

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 2:42 PM 0

15. E.N.

Posts: 2610; Member since: Jan 25, 2009

I agree completely. It actually looks pretty good on the wrist

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 6:08 PM 0

5. erikiksaz

Posts: 170; Member since: Apr 22, 2010

Agree. I'm not much of an apple fan, but I they usually have the aesthetics down. This looks like an mini iphone 3 on your wrist, both shape and iOS version.

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:33 PM 0

14. arch_angel

Posts: 1651; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

This ^^^^

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 2:43 PM 0

7. farisridzwan

Posts: 6; Member since: Dec 12, 2013

naaahh apple boy will buy iAnything

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:43 PM 0

8. igorb81

Posts: 77; Member since: Feb 27, 2012

Ain't that the truth. I can't believe how ugly this watch is. IMHO it does not seem appropriate for either male or female. I could never see my wife wearing that watch and I prefer manly looking large round face stainless steel watches. I have been wearing Invicta watches for long time. For $300 you could buy a lot better looking watch and all other features are available from my smartphone so this is a fail in my books but I do know there will be millions of sheep bending over and getting in the line for this mediocre, overpriced useless gadget. Have fun. I would have to wait a few years before smartwatches mature. I prefer the look of Moto 360 or similar. But this is rubbish from the style standpoint and I don't see any benefit of getting this watch just another gadget to charge every night. No thanks! The last Casio watch I wore was back in 1994 I think Apple is couple decades behind. At least you didn't have to charge Casio every night. Good luck is all I can say.

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:44 PM 0

2. guest

Posts: 372; Member since: Jun 13, 2012

Wow pretty unimpressive

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:29 PM 3

3. waddup121 unregistered

I aint mad. I ain't mad at all~

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:30 PM 0

9. bokimaricu

Posts: 89; Member since: Dec 21, 2013

Not ugly, but pretty regular.. Still, they'll make enormous amounts of money on this because it has the Apple logo. Consumerism is a terrible thing.

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:44 PM 0

10. DonkeySauce

Posts: 194; Member since: Dec 03, 2011

Finally, The fastest way to identify a douchebag!

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 1:49 PM 2

11. DeusExCellula

Posts: 1390; Member since: Oct 05, 2014

Still cant find a reason to engage in smart-watches...

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 2:07 PM 0

12. McLTE

Posts: 922; Member since: Oct 18, 2011

I may regret saying this.. but I honestly don't think I looks as gawd awful as I thought it would, on the wrist anyway. It seems to have at least taken a crack at addressing the biggest issue that I see plaguing watches these days.. chunkiness. While I'm not a huge fan of square watches, this one does look reasonably thin - more important to me than round. while I LOVE the moto 360 idea, I couldn't buy one due to how chunky and big it is. I wouldn't buy this watch, especially at this price.. but it taking watches in the right direction. Come on Moto or LG.. Cut the thickness by 1/3 and you'll have my money!

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 2:27 PM 0

16. Nathillien unregistered

All these ads would look waaaay better with any ordinary watch instead of that toy.

posted on Mar 09, 2015, 8:12 PM 0

17. theo14461 unregistered

Blondie with the nose ring is cute.

posted on Mar 10, 2015, 11:27 PM 0

view all comments

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.