Apple, Samsung, Google, HTC, Microsoft and others agree to voluntary anti-theft tool for smartphones

Apple, Samsung, Google, HTC, Microsoft and others agree to voluntary anti-theft tool for smartphones
While it might not be the mandatory "Kill Switch" that many law enforcement officials and Capitol Hill have asked for, many of the big players in the U.S. mobile industry have come together to address the issue of smartphone theft. According to a voluntary policy initiative that has the backing of the CTIA, a number of manufacturers and carriers have agreed to support the inclusion of an anti-theft tool on new smartphones. 

On Tuesday, Apple and Samsung joined with other companies like Google, HTC, Huawei, Microsoft, Motorola, Nokia, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint. All of these firms have agreed to add an anti-theft tool to the phones they manufacture or sell to the U.S. public, starting in July 2015. The hope is that by allowing stolen phones to be remotely shut down, it will remove the incentive for thieves to steal them. Criminals profit from smartphone thefts by obtaining personal information, including financial passwords and PIN numbers, from the phone. In addition, a stolen smartphone could be sold in the black market. The anti-theft tool is expected to prevent both of these from happening.

According to the CTIA, the tool will allow users to remotely wipe their device in the event it is lost or stolen. Data that will be wiped include personal information that is added after the purchase of the phone. The tool will also allow the user to remotely make the phone impossible to use without a PIN or password, except for emergency 911 calls. Along these lines, a locked down phone could be set not to reactivate without the user's authorization. If the lost or stolen smartphone is recovered by the authorized user, personal data can be restored from the cloud.

The anti-theft tool will come out of the box on new phones sold starting in July 2015, or will be downloaded on these devices. In addition, the mobile carriers who agreed to participate, will allow customers to obtain this anti-theft tool and use it on phones purchased from them. Many believed that the manufacturers would never agree to such a tool because it might cost them some replacement sales. And it was also believed that the carriers would not agree to a "Kill Switch" since it might cost them the revenue from selling premium smartphone insurance, which covers stolen handsets. But both have come together to agree to this very important initiative, which could save the lives of some of their customers.

Not everyone was excited with the voluntary plan. California state Sen. Mark Leno, who has a mandatory "Kill Switch" bill proposed in Congress, says that by making the anti-theft tool voluntary, the plan announced on Tuesday "misses the mark if the ultimate goal is to combat street crime and violent thefts involving smartphones and tablets."

source: CTIA, Recode via Engadget



8. htcforlife

Posts: 73; Member since: Apr 15, 2014

only in the us? why not globally? and what would happen if someone quickly rooted and flashed everything and sold it in another country? apart from that i guess its good news

7. VZWuser76

Posts: 4974; Member since: Mar 04, 2010

Not much different than a blacklisted CDMA phone. You can call in and have it thrown on the blacklist and the IMIE number cannot be activated on any network.

6. TechnoTechyes

Posts: 71; Member since: Jan 24, 2011

This will hurt all those companies financially. Stolen phones = more new phone sales. I'll bet this slows sales by 10%. - I'm not saying it is not a good thing to do, I'm just saying that I understand why the manufacturers were resistant.

5. a_merryman

Posts: 749; Member since: Dec 14, 2011

Thank god, so much better than that kill switch. That is the last things we need as consumers is the kill switch plan they were calling for. This method seems to keep the power solely in the consumers hands.

4. Lt.Green

Posts: 397; Member since: Mar 13, 2014

They should make a self-destruct mode ala Mission Impossible.

3. alexandrecastro

Posts: 26; Member since: Feb 23, 2014

I wonder how they'll secure android recovery mode / adb / download mode ...

10. sprockkets

Posts: 1612; Member since: Jan 16, 2012

Easy, lock the bootloader. Look at moto. You won't get into their phones without unlocking it. Now, if unlocked, how will that play into the whole locking scheme? Well, the bootloader can be relocked, but there would have to be extra countermeasures in place for that to happen remotely.

2. express77 unregistered

this is great idea. better than kill switch. or is it the same?

11. Valdomero

Posts: 707; Member since: Nov 13, 2012

It's more like an "Erase and Block" switch rather than a "Kill Switch", still, the idea is good tho. I believe there are services out there that already do this...

1. sriuslywtf

Posts: 297; Member since: Jul 09, 2013

Best news of the week!

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless