Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile Review
T-Mobile’s Samsung Galaxy S II is about to embark on its own journey, as it aims to reign supreme over T-Mobile’s lineup. Employing a new processor under the hood and a slightly higher $229.99 on-contract price than its siblings, will it still be able to impress after we’ve seen two great offerings from Sprint and AT&T already? Well, T-Mobile customers are surely hoping that’s the case with this one.
Sharing a similar design footprint to the Sprint Samsung Epic 4G Touch, with its size, dimensions, and weight, T-Mobile’s Samsung Galaxy S II is every bit the same appealing handset that we love. Plastic in nature, it’s lightweight for its size, but we truly like its rubbery textured back cover that keeps it looking clean at all times. However, it’s your conventional looking smartphone slate.
You can compare the T-Mobile’s Samsung Galaxy S II with many other phones using our Size Visualization Tool.
Above all, its 4.52” WVGA Super AMOLED Plus display continues to impress us with its wide viewing angles, high-contrast looks, and vibrant color production. Even though it’s sufficient for most things, its resolution is clearly beginning to show its age – and it’s especially evident with web browsing!
Around its sides, we find its volume rocker, power button, 3.5 mm headset jack, noise cancellation microphone, standard microphone, and a microUSB port – with the latter, you gain video-out functionality with the use of an MHL adapter. Around the back, it features an 8-megapixel auto-focus camera with LED flash and notches for its speaker. Meanwhile, pulling off the back cover reveals its beefy 1,850 mAh battery, SIM card slot, and microSD card slot.
microUSB port on the bottom edge
Volume key on the left
Power key on the right
3.5 mm jack on top
The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S II for T-Mobile
1. remixfa posted on 10 Oct 2011, 07:06 3 3
S3.. makes me cry every time i think about how Tmobile pulled the bait n switch on all those people waiting for an SGS2
8. bobfreking55 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 08:41 0 0
The video review shows lagginess. Benchmarks show otherwise... why???
12. remixfa posted on 10 Oct 2011, 10:37 0 0
benchmarks are not a true indicator of real world performance. Snapdragon's are notoriously easy to mess with when it comes to Quadrant Benchmarks, so my guess is Samsung messed with them a bit so it would squelch some people's fears of the under performing S3 processor.
It will be fine for 90% of the people out there, but tech heads like me and people that want that buttery smoothness will see the difference right away.
13. remixfa posted on 10 Oct 2011, 10:38 0 0
Also, touchwiz has been optimized for Exynos. So a few updates might help it out immensely. However, I dont expect samsung to be putting too much update weight behind this version of the SGS2 since 90% of the rest of the world is getting the exynos version. Love it out of the box or dont buy it.
33. bobfreking55 posted on 11 Oct 2011, 06:59 0 0
So this is the worst??
17. Ivan6479 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 11:44 2 0
Damn what's up with people giving you a thumbs down? You are only speaking the truth. It was pretty dirty of T-mobile to pull that crap on their customers especially seeing how they were the last ones to get the device. Oh well thank goodness I'm with At&t because I am loving my SGS2 with my Exynos processor. :)
2. Nickmfnjackson posted on 10 Oct 2011, 07:11 2 0
Buy this today or wait for the nexus prime??? I'm so tired of waiting...
4. Rooney (unregistered) posted on 10 Oct 2011, 07:32 0 0
Let 's buy it. Nexus Prime is just a trial on Ice Cream Sandwich OS, nothing special, camera is just 5MP. Nex Prime like nexus one andnexus S just the trial and expiriments of new Rom. The others device will be update soon after
5. willardcw4 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 07:35 0 0
Don't pretend to know the specs on the Nexus Prime. They haven't been announced. It could be a 13MP camera for all we know.
7. KEVlN posted on 10 Oct 2011, 07:51 1 0
The MP count doesn't mean much. It might just have a 5MP camera but the sensor could produce results better than the SGSII's 8MP camera. Sure SGSII might get ICS sometime but I can assure you it will not be soon. Of all the manufacturers, Samsung has been known to keep their consumers waiting the longest. It took forever for the original SGS (vibrant) to get updated from android 2.1 eclair to 2.2 froyo and by the time they released froyo to the public (which wasn't OTA but through Samsung's proprietary software), android 2,3 gingerbread was out and being pushed to other phones. So if history repeats itself and your anticipating an update for ICS on the SGSII, you can say bye bye to that dream now.
22. taz89 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 13:54 0 1
in the US it gets update late because of your carriers...in the UK galaxy series have been getting updates quicker than everyone else
9. bobfreking55 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 08:42 0 0
Nexus Prime will set the new Standard.
I'd say go with the new standard. :)
19. The_Miz posted on 10 Oct 2011, 11:57 3 5
Oh yes, because the Nexus S really set a new standard.
24. Thump3rDX17 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 15:11 2 0
right? and how about that iPhone 4S? real revolutionary huh? ;)
27. The_Miz posted on 10 Oct 2011, 15:38 0 5
Yup. Jealous much?
28. Thump3rDX17 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 15:42 1 0
your sarcasm does your 4S no justice.
6. KEVlN posted on 10 Oct 2011, 07:36 1 0
I'd wait for the prime. You can't really go wrong with either but If you want vanilla android go Prime... If you want a user friendly-ish UI go SGSII. The SGSII is still the best phone on the market and Verizon is rumored to have exclusivity over the Prime so you might have a longer wait than you expected if your going with T-Mobile.
3. RORYREVOLUTION posted on 10 Oct 2011, 07:17 3 0
No points on the upgraded data speeds? Seems like they should have just kept the exynos processor.
14. remixfa posted on 10 Oct 2011, 10:39 2 0
exactly. real world speeds are in the teens most of the time regardless of if its capable of 21mb/s or 42mb/s. they dropped 25%+ power to have an advertising gimick. ugh.
21. RORYREVOLUTION posted on 10 Oct 2011, 12:16 0 0
It makes be wonder why Verizon didn't do something similar. If the Exynos processor isn't capable with LTE, why didn't they do something like this? I mean sure it sucks it has a snapdragon processor and all but its better than not having it at all.
25. Thump3rDX17 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 15:15 0 0
i suppose it was a risk to them with so many other high-end devices coming out. Verizon will be offering the best from HTC, Samsung & Motorola here in a couple of months and they already have the reputation of having the worst Galaxy S phones and besides i think Samsung is more pleased with Droid branding considering how successful the Droid Charge is even at a $299.99 price point..
10. thethingis (unregistered) posted on 10 Oct 2011, 08:55 0 0
BUT... does this thing have a notification LED?
11. deeoh1084 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 09:53 1 0
i really don't get y stupid Tmobile decided to put the snapdragon S3 instead of blazing fast exynos if theres no point on the upgraded data speeds (i use sensation 4g which is 24mbps and it's fast enough for me)?? so so so disappointed... well i guess i'm gonna go with Nexus Prime (if it has the sd card slot) stupid tmobile... so stupid
15. tharag posted on 10 Oct 2011, 10:58 0 0
prime & gs2 both are class apart ....prime will be a delightful treat for techy's....& gs2 provide the balance of performance as well as user friendlly nature for common users...
16. Sam (unregistered) posted on 10 Oct 2011, 11:18 0 0
What are the 3G bands on this phone? Will it work in India which requires a 1900/2100 band?
I dont know why Tmobile is messing with a proven phone. They should have stuck with the smaller screen and the samsung processor. They just wanted to have a marketable phone and as most marketing just bumped up specs without adding much substance! The phone seems a bit too large and the processor hasn't added any real gains and to make it worse I dont think it has the global 3G band as well.
18. The_Miz posted on 10 Oct 2011, 11:54 1 3
Typical PA ignorance at its finest. Bawww, it doesn't have the monster processor from the Sprint version, so we'll give it a crap review. Average guy isn't going to notice a difference. But kudos for leaving off Samsungs crappy design which plagues the Sprint version of dropped calls and data failure. This review is ignorant. Course why should I care? I prefer the superior iphone.
20. RORYREVOLUTION posted on 10 Oct 2011, 12:11 0 0
I easily noticed the difference between this and the other SGS2 devices, you don't have to look hard.
Sure unless you have already used one or have it side by side you are correct it still out performs any other android phone but in the end they should have kept the exynos processor and left the price at 199.
Unless you are in a very strong 4G t mobile area you won't be able to benefit from the faster data speeds but no matter what connection you are on. Wifi, 4G, or 3G you'll always notice and appreciate the better processor that the exynos brings.
26. Thump3rDX17 posted on 10 Oct 2011, 15:17 0 0
without Exynos the Droid Bionic is probably the better choice.
23. henrickrw posted on 10 Oct 2011, 14:50 0 0
Exynos processor & my internationa GS2 is still in full command
29. boogiman (unregistered) posted on 10 Oct 2011, 15:59 0 0
Seriously.... Give a bad review because it doesn't have the almight Exynos processor....Give me a break. So this phone doesn't live up to the hype for you fanboi's. So freakin what if it doesn't live up to your hype. Keep using your Loss of service sprint version of the galaxy and the oh so smaller screen on the at&t version and be happy. No one cares if you don't like that this has a different processor. Keep it moving and go enjoy trying to find 3g service with sprints crappy service. Oh lets not forget that the 4g phone you have with sprint is not going to even get the aging wimax that you were promised. I would take this phone over sprints crap service and at&t's ridiculous prices.. Dueces...
30. Rick (unregistered) posted on 10 Oct 2011, 17:34 0 0
This is why I left T-Mobile after 6 years and went to AT&T FOR THEIR GALAXY S2, AND BECAUSE I get 3g on my Omnia 7 now instead of just edge. I hated to leave but I see no reason to pay more for a phone that is not better but in fact less than another of the same brand on at&t or sprint.
31. saar (unregistered) posted on 10 Oct 2011, 20:24 0 0
Does someone know ever can I buy this phone's battery?
It's 1850 Mah battery that can also be place in the "Original" SGS2.
32. SprintPower posted on 11 Oct 2011, 06:34 0 0
Funny how they forgot to mention Sprint's complete lack of 4G when saying they prefer the Sprint version. Not only that, but Sprint even says it will be late 2013 before they pull their heads out of their asses. Guess I need to change my handle. Just dumped Sprint for T-Mo to grab up this beauty. And I'll finally get to experience 4G. Anyone want to buy a Sprint EVO 4G?
35. treo...not! (unregistered) posted on 11 Oct 2011, 19:48 0 0
Who writes these reviews?!
"If you are strongly devoted to the Galaxy S II idea, and switching the carrier is not a problem for you, you'll surely want to know that T-Mobile’s version IS BY FAR THE LEAST favorable option on our list. Taking into account its higher $229.99 price point and not as buttery smooth performance, Sprint’s Samsung Epic 4G Touch is looking A TEENY BIT BETTER."
Which one is it?
37. watbetch (unregistered) posted on 12 Oct 2011, 00:22 0 1
the increase in HSPA speed is not a gimmick, they're real. Get a clue you fool
41. jroc74 posted on 14 Oct 2011, 11:12 0 0
The thing is was it worth it for a weaker cpu, gpu or a cpu,gpu that isnt as good with Touchwiz?
21Mbps that the Exynos is capped at is probably faster than most get with home ISP's and if ppl could actually hit 21Mbps down consistently thats more than fast enough for a phone.
IMO T Mobile shoulda went with the Exynos.
38. Anony (unregistered) posted on 12 Oct 2011, 11:05 0 0
It doesn't matter. There is already a SGSII LTE/HD LTE in the works.
39. FUCK (unregistered) posted on 12 Oct 2011, 11:10 0 0
THIS PHONE IS BEST f**kING PHONE OUT IPHONE CAN SUCK MY d**k
40. vennenno (unregistered) posted on 12 Oct 2011, 15:17 0 0
Parece que es el ganador en la guerra de los smartphones.