Google's Schmidt says Android models aiming for cheaper price point
Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney notes that Nokia is already offering Symbian powered smartphones at the lower price and that as long as there are customers shelling out $400 for a pair of Nike Air Jordan sneakers, there will be people willing to pay $200 for a smartphone. It's one thing to sell handsets at a low price, but can a company make money at that level? Current Analysis analyst Avi Greengart brought up the point that Nokia makes nice profits on its low priced featurephones and as that market slowly moves to smartphones, profits can still be made. Greengart says that this low margin game isn't for every OEM. He says manufacturers that want to assure themselves of high margins should stay out of low margin areas, a game plan used by Apple, notes the analyst. "Apple is slowly pushing down into lower price tiers, but is doing so at its own pace and is not chasing market share or unit volumes if it can't get the margins it wants," said Greengert.
The Current Account analyst also believes that carriers should be happy about lower priced hardware because it leaves the customer with more money to spend on the carrier's data plans. As for Google, Eric Schmidt seems to be on the right path. Lower priced handsets mean huge growth in Android users which means more viewers for mobile ads which means more money in Google's pockets. In fact, our old buddy from Piper Jaffray, Gene Munster, sees Android business reaching $4.5 billion in 2012, up an incredible 80% from 2011. As Ovum Research's Cripps comments, Android's amazing growth thus far may seem modest when compared to what happens in the future.
1. cepcamba posted on 05 Mar 2012, 14:21 6 0
So next year I'll be able to get a Note for $70??? :p
3. remixfa posted on 05 Mar 2012, 14:27 10 1
chips become smaller, more powerful, and cheaper at the same time. technology matures. 10 years ago you couldnt buy a desktop for 2000 that equals the power in an average $500 laptop.
8. JeffdaBeat posted on 05 Mar 2012, 16:20 2 0
Thumbs up man...but although that's very true, we can't discount technology itself advancing. What I mean by that is that smartphones, although very powerful, still don't equate to what an actual computer can do. Our smartphones may drop dramatically in price, but something else will replace it at that higher price point. Maybe we will be able to actually carry the power and function of a computer in our pocket, which will render our current smartphones the equivalent of a feature phone to us today. Technology will always be cheaper (inflation), but it doesn't mean that the best technology on the market will be affordable by everyone. When things become too cheap, manufacturers will add something to drive up the price and give you more options.
4. knights4life03 posted on 05 Mar 2012, 14:27 0 0
i really hope the pricing drops...... $200-400 is a mean price for 2 years and actually 400 is near the standard price... so yea ridiculous
6. JBz007 posted on 05 Mar 2012, 14:45 1 0
I would probably be happier being able to pay outright for the latest and greatest and it not cost $700. $400 would be much better off contract and then $70 on contract. Win-win for us consumers. until our monthly bill goes up...
9. gallitoking posted on 05 Mar 2012, 16:41 1 2
it makes total sense.. most androids phones goes for a penny 2 months after launch... it will be on par with manufacturer cost.. now
11. -box- posted on 05 Mar 2012, 18:38 3 0
if only apples went for closer to their true cost...
That being said, I dream of a day where manufacturers of high-turnover products (like phones) offer them at a lower cost, say no more than $400-500 off contract for the nicest of devices like a Galaxy S2 or a HTC One X or Nokia 808 or 900. I can buy a laptop which does everything a phone does (with video calling) for less than the cost of a smartphone, and it's more capable, will last me longer, and, with the exception of looking ridiculous holding it up to take a picture with a webcam, would do anything a phone does