Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Review

19comments
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Review
Introduction:

Samsung's lower midrange champion, the Galaxy Ace line, got a third generation entrant this year with the aptly named Galaxy Ace 3. It is not a huge upgrade over its predecessor, however, as is the habit with Samsung's annual updates, and the phone mainly got a 0.2" screen bump and a tad faster processor.

Another ace up its sleeve, pun not intended, is that the Ace 3 runs the newest Android 4.2 and is splattered with the newest TouchWiz Nature UX interface from Samsung. Is this enough to warrant your upgrade, or make you choose it before the sea of Android midrangers out there? Read on to find out...

Design:

Molded in the tried and true chubby plastic traditions of Samsung, the Ace 3 hasn't gotten much prettier in its third iteration than the previous two. We have the LTE version of the phone for review, which is slightly thicker and heavier than the 9.8mm 3G version.

The typical soapy shape with tapered sides and metal-like rim around the front panel do look decent, though, and the dark blue patterned plastic on the back is a nice change from Samsung's glossy black covers of yesteryear.


Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
Dimensions

4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches

121.2 x 62.7 x 10 mm

Weight

4.22 oz (120 g)

LG Optimus F5
Dimensions

4.96 x 2.54 x 0.37 inches

126 x 64.5 x 9.3 mm

Weight

4.62 oz (131 g)

Sony Xperia L
Dimensions

5.07 x 2.56 x 0.38 inches

128.7 x 65 x 9.7 mm

Weight

4.83 oz (137 g)

Nokia Lumia 520
Dimensions

4.72 x 2.52 x 0.39 inches

119.9 x 64 x 9.9 mm

Weight

4.37 oz (124 g)

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
Dimensions

4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches

121.2 x 62.7 x 10 mm

Weight

4.22 oz (120 g)

LG Optimus F5
Dimensions

4.96 x 2.54 x 0.37 inches

126 x 64.5 x 9.3 mm

Weight

4.62 oz (131 g)

Sony Xperia L
Dimensions

5.07 x 2.56 x 0.38 inches

128.7 x 65 x 9.7 mm

Weight

4.83 oz (137 g)

Nokia Lumia 520
Dimensions

4.72 x 2.52 x 0.39 inches

119.9 x 64 x 9.9 mm

Weight

4.37 oz (124 g)

Compare these and other phones using our Size Comparison tool.


The phone has become slightly taller compared to the Ace 2, to accommodate the larger screen, but the side bezel has shrunk and the width has been kept almost identical, so the phone is very easy to hold and operate with one hand as well.

The volume rocker on the left and the power/lock key at the right are thin, but not uncomfortably so, and are very easy to feel and press, with good tactile feedback, as is the large physical home key underneath the display.




Display:

We get a 4” LCD screen with the Galaxy Ace 3, which sports 480x800 pixels of resolution, ringing in a decent for this class 233ppi pixel density. The screen sports good color representation and very nice viewing angles.

The panel's brightness is not very high, and its reflectivity is about average, meaning that outside under direct sunlight you'll have trouble telling what's going on, even at maximum luminance.





Interface and functionality:

Samsung's latest TouchWiz Nature UX is painted over Android 4.2 on the Ace 3, so you pretty much know what to expect, as all the usual widgets and settings are present. From the bells and whistles that come with the flagship S4, here we only have S Travel that partners with TripAdvisor, Smart Stay and S Translator. The interface doesn't sport all the fancy transparencies and animations that the more powerful handsets from Samsung are able to display, and this, coupled with the run-of-the-mill resolution make the UI look a bit dated.



The on-screen keyboard comes with word prediction and over 50 different input languages to pick from, but it is not a stellar typing experience because of the squished key layout with large gaps on a fairly modest 4” display.

Processor and memory:

A 1 GHz dual-core processor is what's powering the 3G version of the Ace 3, which is modest for today's standard, and the LTE variance we have for review kicks it up a notch to a 1.2 GHz dual-core CPU with a PowerVR SGX544MP GPU.

The handset runs Android 4.2 Jelly Bean with minute hiccups during transitional animations, but app loading times as well as multitasking are carried out with decent speeds, though it is pretty visible that the phone is not a speed demon, as the benchmark tests below can attest.

The 3G version of the phone has 4 GB of internal memory (about 2 GB of which are user-available), and the LTE one sports 8 GB of storage (5 GB user-available), while Samsung has supplied a gig of RAM and a microSD slot for storage expansion on both.

QuadrantHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 33201
Sony Xperia L4223
AnTuTuHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 310628
Sony Xperia L9225
GFXBench Egypt HD 2.5 onscreen(fps)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 317
Vellamo MetalHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3352
Sony Xperia L449
Vellamo HTML 5Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 31431
Sony Xperia L1804


Internet and connectivity:

Granted, browsing on a 4” display is not as pleasant as on a 5- or even 6-incher, which are not a rarity these days, but the stock TouchWiz browser is quick to render pages and zooming is smooth. You can also display Adobe Flash content if needed, which is an advantage before the default Android browser Chrome.

Other than that, we aren't presented with anything out of the ordinary in terms of features – just the usual set of tools like Incognito mode, support for multiple windows, and playback of embedded YouTube videos.



As we mentioned, the Ace 3 comes in two versions – one with LTE radio, for the respective carriers that support this fast 4G standard, in addition to HSPA+ download speeds up to 42.2 Mbit/s, while the 3G version comes with 14.4 Mbit/s radio only. There is also a version with two SIM cards that lets you use more than one carrier network at once.

The rest of the connectivity features for the 3G version are Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, A-GPS, Wi-Fi Direct, FM radio with RDS and that's about it, while the LTE variant throws in NFC as well.

Camera:

A 5 MP camera with LED flash is found on the back of the Galaxy Ace 3, with the new Nature UX camera interface accompanying it. The app offers a more limited number of shooting modes, which can be quickly picked from the carousel on the right, than Samsung's higher-resolution phone cameras. There are no Rich Tone (HDR) capabilities, for example, but the Best Shot, Sound&Shot and Panorama options are present, as well as a Macro mode.



The pictures look pretty good for an unassuming camera, as was the case with the Ace 2. We wish there was some more detail in the pictures, but color representation is quite accurate, and the phone's auto setting capture the scenes correctly, though there are some shadow clippings in high dynamic range situations. There are no white balance issues and the contrast is pumped up a notch by default, which yields pretty pleasant to look at results.



The handset does video recording with 720p resolution at 30fps, which should be the bare minimum nowadays, and in that regard is the same as its 2012 predecessor. There are some artifacts present from time to time, but other than that the video runs smooth, with good amount of detail and accurate color presentation. That's outdoors, with enough daylight, however, while low-light and video is extremely noisy. Of note is that the microphone picks up audio with very good and clean volume while recording the footage.

Taking a picLower is betterTaking an HDR pic(sec)Lower is betterCamSpeed scoreHigher is betterCamSpeed score with flashHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 34.4
No data
374
375
Sony Xperia L5
6.3
709
710
Nokia Lumia 5204.7
No data
345
No data


Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Sample video:

Video Thumbnail


Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Indoor sample video:

Video Thumbnail


Multimedia:

The gallery offers Samsung's split view mode that keeps your folders on the left, and their content on the right for easier access. You can also edit the photos with a bunch of enhancement options and color effects directly from the app itself, as usual with TouchWiz, but here the Photo Editor option has to be downloaded separately.


Music playback is done via the TouchWiz stock player, which offers an abundance of sound modes and equalizer presets. The loudspeaker is of average strength, but emits a comparatively clean sound with no audible distortions towards the highest volume.



The video player runs most major formats without a hitch, including MKV and Xvid files, and up to 1080p resolution at that, though for some reason it doesn't play DivX files out of the box.

Headphones output power(Volts)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 30.37
Sony Xperia L0.24
Nokia Lumia 5200.67
Loudspeaker loudness(dB)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 377
Sony Xperia L79
Nokia Lumia 52076



Call quality:

The earpiece of the Galaxy Ace 3 sounds very loud, to the point that we had to take volume down three or four marks, and the voices come in rather clean and distinct. The microphone is also a good performer, relaying our voices to the other side with a strong volume, though with some distortion and hissing at certain consonants and combos like “s” or “sh”.

Battery:

Since LTE connectivity requires more juice, Samsung has supplied that version of the Galaxy Ace 3 with a 1800 mAh battery, while the thinner 3G variant has a 1500 mAh unit. No official talk and standby times are given for the handset yet, but with these battery capacities something tells us it won't be an endurance king anyway.

We measure battery life by running a custom web-script,designed to replicate the power consumption of typical real-life usage.All devices that go through the test have their displays set at 200-nit brightness.
hoursHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
6h 6 min(Poor)
Sony Xperia L
6h(Poor)


Conclusion:

When Samsung slapped the slogan “Enjoy the New Mobile Essentials” on the Galaxy Ace 3, it meant it. The phone is a very mild upgrade over its predecessor the Ace 2, and only the LTE version offers more internal memory and a faster 4G radio, which will likely come at a heftier price.

The price will ultimately be what determines the Ace 3 success, as, besides the Samsung branding and newest Android version, it doesn't offer much differentiation in the sea of humble midrangers. Thus it better be priced lower than last year's Galaxy S III Mini, for instance, since that one has very similar dimensions, but is more elegant and has more internal memory out of the box.

Other direct competitors are LG's Optimus F5, with similar specs, but a slightly larger display, and the Sony Xperia P with the same screen size, but higher resolution, and with more internal memory. If we look at the Windows Phone world, the Nokia Lumia 520 beckons in multiple colors with similar specs and a rock bottom pricing.

Software version: JDQ39

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Video Review:

Video Thumbnail


Pros

  • Good picture quality
  • Good call quality

Cons

  • Very noisy indoor video capture
  • Feels a bit slow at times

PhoneArena Rating:

7.0

User Rating:

9.1
7 Reviews
Create a free account and join our vibrant community
Register to enjoy the full PhoneArena experience. Here’s what you get with your PhoneArena account:
  • Access members-only articles
  • Join community discussions
  • Share your own device reviews
  • Build your personal phone library
Register For Free

Recommended Stories

Loading Comments...
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless