Oh, Motorola, what have you done with us, releasing such a decked-out smartphone, and leaving it as a Verizon exclusive? The DROID Turbo justifies its title by offering the best that component makers currently have on the market – Quad HD panel, Snapdragon 805 chipset, and a 20 MP camera, all backed up with a giant for the category 3900 mAh battery, promising a two-day endurance, something unheard of for a QHD phone.

Actually, there is no other match for the DROID Turbo in the market, but Samsung's freshly-brewed Note 4 mega-monster, which in its turn sports a larger, 5.7” QHD screen, also an 805 chipset, and an optically-stabilized 16 MP shooter. That is why are pitting the two current Android champions in the cage, and making sure there are no under-the-belt punches...


Smaller and chubbier, the DROID Turbo weighs as much as the larger Note 4, but feels more ergonomic in the palm.

The two phones are fatties for today's demanding standards of sub-8mm flagships, yet the Note 4 clocks in at 0.33” (8.5mm), while the Turbo has the whopping up to 11.2mm girth, depending on whether you get the thinner Metallic, or the just slightly thicker Ballistic Nylon model. Hey, that gigantic battery has to fit somewhere, right? Given the much smaller display, the Turbo is way more comfortable to operate with one hand than the largish Note 4. The phones weigh the same, though, which doesn't bode very well for the thuggish Turbo, which is much smaller.

Samsung offers a removable back cover, which lets you swap the battery, or add more storage, while the Turbo doesn't. The Samsung phablet also comes with the S Pen stylus and its fingerprint scanner, ushering in one more input method, and one more security layer, in case you are inclined to use those.

Motorola does have a few tricks up its sleeve in terms of design against the Note 4 as well, since it offers a few versions of the Turbo with innovative materials like ballistic nylon and metalized fiber for the chassis, and there is even an eye-catchy red version, too. Samsung made the Note 4 look more premium than its predecessors, however, with a metal side rim, so we'd call it a draw in the design department.

Motorola DROID Turbo

Motorola DROID Turbo


5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches

143.5 x 73.3 x 11.2 mm


6.21 oz (176 g)

Samsung Galaxy Note 4

Samsung Galaxy Note 4


6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches

153.5 x 78.6 x 8.5 mm


6.21 oz (176 g)

Motorola DROID Turbo

Motorola DROID Turbo


5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches

143.5 x 73.3 x 11.2 mm


6.21 oz (176 g)

Samsung Galaxy Note 4

Samsung Galaxy Note 4


6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches

153.5 x 78.6 x 8.5 mm


6.21 oz (176 g)

To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page


The Turbo might sport record pixel density, but Note 4 nails it in every aspect that matters, like color accuracy and peak brightness.

The 5.2” 1440x2560 resolution panel of the Turbo holds the pixel density record with the breathtaking 565ppi. Galaxy Note 4 is not far behind, though, as it boasts the same resolution, but on a 5.7” display diagonal, returning 515ppi. Both are some of the best numbers in the industry, so no matter what pixel matrix is used to achieve those crazily crammed dots, you'd be hard pressed to find any jaggies in small text, icons, and throughout the interface.

Both panels are of the AMOLED variety, but they are pretty different. We measured the Note 4 to offer great 6700K color temperature and to be very, very color-accurate in its Basic screen mode. The Droid Turbo has an even better white point (6600K), very near to the reference 6500K, but its colors are not accurate. The Turbo exhibits very oversaturated greens, which goes somewhat for the reds and blues as well, and the color points are off the standard marks for the most part, while the Note 4 fits very nicely in the sRGB gamut reference. Keep in mind that previous Samsung phones, like the S5, S4 and Note 3, have proven that many people like these oversaturated but inaccurate colors, and the Droid Turbo isn't worse than them.

Another DROID Turbo display downside is that it is pretty dim, at 248nits measures, against the 468 nits of the Note 4, so you will have trouble telling what's on the screen of the Turbo on a bright sunny day outdoors.

Thus, we'd have to give the display round to the Note 4.



1. Zylam

Posts: 1817; Member since: Oct 20, 2010

The Turbo/Maxx destroys the note 4. Note 4 in't even in the same league when compared to the real Android flagship.

2. ebubekir26

Posts: 337; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

review shows otherwise... you OVER-exaggerated with the "DESTROYS THE NOTE 4" bs they are currently the best smartphones you can get, I would personally choose the Note 4, the Turbo won't be available everywhere. Imagine how fast the Note 4 would be with a little bit of tweaking like a custom rom...

18. TheMoltenD

Posts: 109; Member since: Jul 13, 2014

Note 4 is already getting roms.

20. bigmaster

Posts: 198; Member since: Sep 05, 2014

The Note 4 scored 55000 on antutu running a custom rom !!!

36. LionStone

Posts: 1048; Member since: Dec 10, 2010

Imagine having a phone so fast that there isn't a need for a custom rom...that's the Turbo.

4. wilsong17 unregistered

Is that why it has poor maximum brightness

21. VZWuser76

Posts: 4974; Member since: Mar 04, 2010

They had an update already that fixed that.

28. cheetah2k

Posts: 2256; Member since: Jan 16, 2011

Would be nice if iPhone4rena would update their screen tests based on the latest update..... But of course they wouldn't do that bcuz iPhone bias

29. g2a5b0e unregistered

I'm sorry, but this is one of the most ridiculous accusatory posts I've seen yet. What would updating a brightness test for the Turbo have to do with the iPhone?! Are you that stupid? The phone already scored higher than the iPhones did this year! In fact, many Android phones did, but to you, Phone Arena is still biased. What else do you want? You fanboys will scream bloody murder over anything!

5. g2a5b0e unregistered

Your comment is a joke. You might think it's better, but no one with a sane mind believes that the Turbo "destroys" the Note 4. Get real & tuck your bias back in. No one wants to see that.

16. JayFiveAlive

Posts: 67; Member since: May 30, 2014

Can't tell if serious, but I'm thinking you're being sarcastic :)

19. McLTE

Posts: 922; Member since: Oct 18, 2011

Have you even handled the Turbo or Note 4?? I played with both at the Verizon store. While the Turbo is pretty cool, it has a few things against it for what I (ME ME ME) want in a phone. 1. I don't want to go backwards to a 5.2" phone. That's just me. 2. There is no LED notification light. That's huge for me. 3. No removable battery. HUGE. With the idea of keeping a phone for 2 years, the batteries do NOT last that long. Can the Turbo have it's battery replaced?? 4. No IR blaster. Not a game breaker, but it's great to have. 5. No SD card slot. I have taken advantage of this too many times to not have it. 6. The reviews show the brightness of the Turbo display is lacking. What I DO like about the Turbo is the chassis and how it handles. People talk about how fat it is.. but it feels great in the hand. I don't want a 5mm phone. I also like the carbon fiber back. Overall, the Note 4 is better in my opinion for what I want in a phone.

23. VZWuser76

Posts: 4974; Member since: Mar 04, 2010

Just a quick little thing about phone batteries. We're waiting for my brother's replacement phone for his Droid Incredible, the original. Up until a month ago, he still had the original battery in there. So it made it roughly 4 years. Not saying they all will, but the capability is there.

35. LionStone

Posts: 1048; Member since: Dec 10, 2010

Ya people like to use the old "I have to have a removable battery because they go bad" excuse, but really I just hear how Samsung batteries overheat and go bad? So I guess that's why they are removable so they can buy more batteries lol!

39. g2a5b0e unregistered

Better than buying a whole new phone when your battery goes bad.

30. SupermanayrB

Posts: 1188; Member since: Mar 20, 2012

Haven't read all of the comments yet, but this is the most sensible comment by far. My Note 4 pros: SD slot Samsung keyboard Customizable fonts LED notification Turbo Pros: Motos interface Easier one hand operation Moto speak Splash resistant Have to test the 2 for myself to know which one is really want.

26. T.Law

Posts: 423; Member since: May 10, 2014

You're delusional. The only things that the Droid has got over the Note 4 is the battery life and arguably better build material. The Note 4 takes the cake.

33. TechieXP1969

Posts: 14967; Member since: Sep 25, 2013

What? Its the same phone with a smaller display, no pen, no multi-window and more. 20MP camera means nothing if it doesn't take better pictures. The Turbo is newer and slightly better but it certainly doesn't destroy the Note 4.

38. blackfury

Posts: 1; Member since: Nov 05, 2014

Yeah,you're right,Note 4 is a class over Motorola Droid! With the last version of AnTuTu 5,Note 4 scored 50500 with original TouchWiz! With custom rom he will destroy Droid Turbo! :))

3. Busyboy unregistered

Really tough one. But I think the Note 4 is advantaged here.

6. RocKO03

Posts: 11; Member since: Apr 18, 2014

Hey, John V did you update the Droid Turbo to the latest system update from Motorola? I think it fixes the brightness issue many websites mention that..

7. scarface21173

Posts: 693; Member since: Aug 17, 2014

I like both, my preference would be the Motorola just because your guaranteed regular updates and I don't like unwanted bloatware.

8. Martin_Cooper

Posts: 1774; Member since: Jul 30, 2013

Considering Note 4 is a phablet which is not something majority of people will choose the droid turbo is an overall winner since more people would be comfortable with its size.

9. itsdeepak4u2000

Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012

Tough but I'll choose Note 4.

10. Scarambay unregistered

Moto's cameras are usually meh, but I'll wait for the Turbo's samples before I come to a conclusion. Note 4 for me as of now.

11. DeusExCellula

Posts: 1390; Member since: Oct 05, 2014

Lol Note 4 please

12. Taters

Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013

The GS5 LTE A holds the pixel density record, not the Droid turbo. Although I am not sure if it's as good as the Note 4 display.

24. VZWuser76

Posts: 4974; Member since: Mar 04, 2010

With the Samsung using a 5.1" at 577 ppi and Motorola using a 5.2" at 565 ppi, I doubt the difference is noticeable.

34. hurrycanger

Posts: 1761; Member since: Dec 01, 2013

I don't think the main point was bragging about how much better the S5 LTE A is. The point was to correct the article where it says "the Turbo holds the pixel density record". Anyway, I agree with you.

41. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

they're pixel density record breakers in their respective markets anyway...

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.