- Home
- Samsung Phones
- You are here
Samsung Galaxy A11
This device is also known as Samsung SM-A115U
Popular Comparisons
The Samsung Galaxy A11 is most commonly compared with these phones:
Design |
|
---|---|
Dimensions |
6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches 163.1 x 76.3 x 8.0 mm |
Weight | 6.24 oz (177.0 g) |
Materials |
Back: Plastic Frame: Plastic |
Biometrics | 2D Face unlock, Fingerprint (touch) |
Keys | Right: Volume control, Lock/Unlock key |
Colors | White, Red, Black, Blue |
Display |
|
---|---|
Size | 6.4-inch |
Resolution | 1560x720px, 19.5:9 ratio, 268 PPI |
Technology | IPS LCD |
Refresh rate | 60Hz |
Screen-to-body | 80.92 % |
Features | Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor |
Hardware |
|
---|---|
System chip | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) |
Processor |
Octa-core 8x 1.8GHz Cortex-A53 |
GPU | Adreno 506 |
RAM | 2GB (LPDDR3) |
Internal storage | 32GB, available to use: 20.3 GB |
Storage expansion | microSDXC up to 512 GB |
OS | Android (11, 10) |
Battery |
|
---|---|
Capacity | 4000 mAh |
Charging | Fast charging |
Charge speed | Wired: 15.0W |
Camera |
|
---|---|
Rear | Triple camera |
Main camera |
13 MP (Autofocus) Aperture size: F1.8 Focal length: 27 mm |
Second camera |
5 MP (Ultra-wide) Aperture size: F2.2 |
Third camera |
2 MP (Depth information) Aperture size: F2.4 |
Flash | LED |
Video recording | 1920x1080 (Full HD) (30 fps) |
Front | 8 MP, Video capture: 1920x1080 (Full HD) |
Connectivity & Features |
|
---|---|
Bluetooth | 4.2 |
WLAN |
802.11 a,b,g,n,ac,dual-band Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot |
USB | Type-C, USB 2.0 |
Hearing aid compatible | M4/T3 |
Location | GPS, A-GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Cell ID, Wi-Fi positioning |
Sensors | Accelerometer |
Other | UMA (Wi-Fi Calling) |
Multimedia |
|
---|---|
Headphones | 3.5mm jack |
Speakers | Earpiece, Loudspeaker |
Screen mirroring | Wireless screen share |
Cellular |
|
---|---|
4G (FDD) | Bands 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(AWS-1), 5(850), 7(2600), 12(700 a), 13(700 c), 20(800 DD), 28(700 APT), 66(AWS-3) |
3G | Bands 1(2100), 2(1900), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 8(900) |
Data Speed | LTE-A Cat 6 (300/50 Mbit/s), HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s |
SIM type | Nano SIM |
HD Voice | Yes |
VoLTE | Yes |
This device has different variants: View all |
Regulatory Approval |
|
---|---|
FCC approval |
Date approved: May 07, 2020 FCC ID value: ZCASMA115U |
Measured SAR |
Head: 1.08 W/kg Body: 0.76 W/kg Simultaneous Transmission: 1.45 W/kg Wireless Router: 0.76 W/kg |
This device has different variants: View all |
Buyers information |
|
---|---|
MSRP | $ 180 |
Availability |
|
---|---|
Officially announced | Mar 13, 2020 |
Alternative variants
Differences from the main variant: | |
---|---|
4G (FDD) | Bands 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(AWS-1), 5(850), 7(2600), 12(700 a), 14(700 PS), 29(700 d), 30(2300 WCS), 66(AWS-3) |
3G | Bands 5(850), 4(1700/2100), 2(1900), 1(2100) |
FCC approval |
Date approved: Apr 27, 2020 FCC ID value: ZCASMA115A |
Measured SAR |
Head: 0.66 W/kg Body: 1.03 W/kg Simultaneous Transmission: 1.55 W/kg Wireless Router: 1.03 W/kg |
Differences from the main variant: | |
---|---|
4G (FDD) | Bands 2(1900), 4(AWS-1), 5(850), 12(700 a), 13(700 c), 25(1900+), 66(AWS-3), 71(600) |
3G | Bands 5(850), 8(900), 2(1900), 1(2100) |
Carrier Availability
Discontinued
Verizon | |
---|---|
AT&T | |
T-Mobile | |
U.S. Cellular | |
Metro by T-Mobile | |
Cricket | |
Boost Mobile | |
Tracfone |
News




Links
User Reviews
I've used this but I'll say it's ok and it's sort of beginner friendly but with this u can get a samsung one ui phone for a cheap price! (On other reviews you'll find a bad reviews ) I would say this phone is currently my main phone but I don't recommend people who wants a perfect phone even with cheap ones but there are better alternatives than this phone or if u have this phone untouched just install lineage os but it's impossible since this phone is a bit unstable with the twrp app to flash twrp.
- Good battery life
- Cheap
- Does a phone do
- Beginner friendly
- Worst Camera
- Not the perfect performance
- Face I'd not as perfect
- Screen sometimes touches the wrong position
I was looking for a new device after a watery mishap with my Motorola Moto E5 Cruise (yes, I know it has a water-repellant nanocoating, but that doesn't always help when the water puddle is deep... and in your own poncho pocket... for an extended period of time). While the battery capacity of the old phone suffered badly, I was able to get the rest of the phone operating mostly okay after a good dry-out, but after a couple of days of that I decided it would be safest to get a new device. I had already been looking at the LG Harmony 4 as a contender at the time, but found this Samsung Galaxy A11 to be potentially a better choice. I had looked at HMD Nokia's, too, but found them to be suffering from a lack of good reviews, and an overabundance of poor reviews, on the carrier website. At $109.99, this was more than twice what I would normally pay for a new phone, but it had the Samsung brand on it that Android users often swear by, so what was the harm, right? Well, the phone works well overall. Sure - there are a few things about it that are annoying - I wish the phone had not cost quite as much, and I wish the phone did not have so much bloatware on it from the carrier and the manufacturer, and I wish the phone had a little more RAM; but, overall, this was not a bad phone. It has Qualcomm's Snapdragon 450 in it, which I believe to be superior to the MediaTek Helio P22 in the primary contender, and now that LG may soon announce that even their existing phones will no longer get software support of any kind (if the rumors can be believed), it is becoming more clear that I chose right; however, the new Cricket Influence (designed and manufactured through the relatively new collaboration of Cricket, Emblem Solutions, and VinGroup... but not covered by this website anywhere) is now available a month after my purchase, is decent for a budget offering, and has a newer and more efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 in it with 3GB of RAM, for less than half of the cost of the Samsung. If I had waited just a month more, I could have gotten that for $39.99, rather than spending $109.99 for the Samsung, so I could have saved a lot of money and gotten a phone that may have had almost the same overall functionality for me (based on my meager usage of smartphones in general). I still think I made the right choice, but I can't help but also see the $70 I could have kept in my wallet.
- Big battery
- 3.5mm audio jack
- Fast charging at up to 15W
- Big display (hole punch)
- microSD support
- most expensive phone I've bought in the last ten years, even though it was on sale...