Talk between FCC and DOJ chiefs might result in approval for the T-Mobile-Sprint merger

Talk between FCC and DOJ chiefs might result in approval for the T-Mobile-Sprint merger
Last Monday, T-Mobile and Sprint executives had quite a roller coaster day. First came word that FCC Chairman Ajit Pai had recommended to the other four FCC commissioners that they vote to allow the $26.5 billion merger of T-Mobile and Sprint to take place. But not too long after that story broke, a person familiar with the Justice Department's review of the transaction said that the agency was going to reject the deal. Approval from both the FCC and DOJ is required for the transaction to close.
However, there still may be a way to salvage the merger. The New York Post reported yesterday that FCC Chairman Pai "consulted" with the DOJ's antitrust chief Makan Delrahim before making the announcement that he would vote to allow the deal to proceed. Many believe that this is a sign that Pai was able to convince Delrahim to overrule the DOJ's staff, which would allow the merger to close.  Both agencies have different assignments when it comes to this deal; the FCC is concerned with how the merger will affect the cellular landscape in terms of spectrum, rural coverage and the rollout of 5G service; the DOJ is concerned with the competitive landscape in the wireless industry if the deal goes through. While it is worried about the number of major U.S. carriers dropping from 4 to 3, a 25% reduction, others argue that the combined T-Mobile-Sprint would be better able to compete with Verizon and AT&T.

To win over the FCC, T-Mobile and Sprint agreed that it would complete 97% of its 5G rollout within three years (85% in rural areas), keep plan prices frozen for three years following the closing of the merger, and sell off Sprint's pre-paid Boost Mobile unit. The report states that the DOJ's Delrahim would like to see T-Mobile freeze prices for seven years instead of the three it agreed to with the FCC. After that, about the only other concession that the DOJ could possibly squeeze out of T-Mobile and Sprint would be for the combined firm to sell off Sprint's pre-paid Virgin Mobile unit. T-Mobile already owns MetroPCS. (The DOJ could ask T-Mobile CEO John Legere to cut his hair, and we wonder if he would agree to that condition to close the deal).

One source says that it will be hard for the DOJ to reject the deal if the FCC approves it

An unnamed source who works with both T-Mobile and Sprint believes that DOJ approval is a lock. "It will be hard for (DOJ chief) Makan (Delrahim) to argue this will have a bad impact on competition when the FCC enforces these conditions," the source notes. "The DOJ will clear this unconditionally."

Both T-Mobile and Sprint had originally placed a deadline of April 28th to close the merger. That was extended to July 29th. If the deal is completed, T-Mobile would finally combine with Sprint after years of rumors and busted deals. Back in 2014, both companies floated trial balloons about a merger only to get shot down by the FCC and DOJ before a transaction was even announced. AT&T thought it had purchased T-Mobile, then the nation's fourth-largest carrier, for $39 billion back in 2011. That deal would have created the largest wireless provider in the U.S., but was shot down by the DOJ. T-Mobile received a nice break-up package from AT&T consisting of $3 billion, 128 AWS markets and more. That helped T-Mobile become what it is now, the fastest growing and most innovative of the four major carriers. The next year, John Legere was named CEO and the rest is history.

T-Mobile is majority owned by Germany's Deutsche Telekom, while Sprint is 80% owned by Japan's SoftBank. The latter bought 78% of Sprint in 2013 after a wild takeover battle against Dish Network and its Chairman Charlie Ergen.

A merger between T-Mobile and Sprint is a match made in spectrum heaven. T-Mobile owns a ton of low-frequency 600MHz spectrum, which dovetails perfectly with Sprint's hoard of mid-range 2.5GHz airwaves. Merging the two will help the combined carrier create a nationwide 5G network using sub-6GHz bands. Verizon and AT&T plan on using mmWave spectrum in the 24GHz to 100GHz range for their mobile 5G service. Frequencies that high travel only a short distance, which is why it will take longer for the nation's top two wireless providers to complete their coast-to-coast 5G networks.



1. oldskool50 unregistered

If this happens, your only cheap option for carriers will be their garage backend lame duck option like MetroPCS, Boost, Virgin and similar.

2. lyndon420

Posts: 6821; Member since: Jul 11, 2012

Come to Canada and pay what we pay for cell phone'll probably crawl back into the fetal position and rethink your life goals lol.

3. Alcyone

Posts: 467; Member since: May 10, 2018

Correct me if I'm wrong. Aren't there only 3 main providers in Canada? Not looking too good for the US. Possibly killing me 5 voice lines and wear line, priced at 130. 3 year price lock, yeah, right, what after? Still gonna allow legacy simple choice to be kept?

6. Galen20K

Posts: 577; Member since: Dec 26, 2008

so you'd rather have two much weaker carriers who have no chance of ever catching up(Sprint and to a lesser extent, T-Mobile), against two MUCH Stronger more powerful and money hungry Monopolistic carriers such as Verizon/Att? No thanks, i'd rather have a third nearly equally powerful carrier to be able to truly compete. Verizon and Att need to feel the heat and make them sweat, it'd be better for all consumers i believe.

9. superguy

Posts: 463; Member since: Jul 15, 2011

Yeah, so instead of 2 companies trying to screw us, we'll have 3. These mergers always promise things will be better and cheaper for the consumer, but neither ever happen. The government forces "concessions" that carriers agree to, then never actually enforces them. Once the companies are finally integrated, they'll start mucking with the plans and prices slowly to see what they can get away with. Things will change and it won't be good for the consumer. T-Mobile offers what it does because it's an underdog and needs a niche to compete. Once it's an equal to the other two, where's the incentive? There won't be any. Prices will go higher will all 3 more or less being in sync, and our only real options will be take it or leave it.

8. Acdc1a

Posts: 475; Member since: Jan 21, 2016

A single line plan in Canada is outrageous and unlimited isn't a thing. The MVNO's take a little bit of pain away like Koodo's 9gb plan going for $65 CAD which is about $48USD. Still, not excited about that possibility.

4. rossy

Posts: 41; Member since: Aug 23, 2013

In 5-7 years time satelite will compete with cellular.

5. Sparkxster

Posts: 1238; Member since: Mar 31, 2017

This is good news hope the deal goes through. There will be plenty of opportunities for other companies to create a new fourth network dish Network has cellular spectrum so they could create a network if they wish.

7. BuffaloSouce unregistered

Yeah so they can say that you're saving money by bundling their already expensive cable plans with cellular plans only to be charged a massive bill every month...

10. superguy

Posts: 463; Member since: Jul 15, 2011

Or they can completely hose your bill trying to combine them like AT&T did with my DirecTV account. They never could figure out what I owed them, and it was never smooth like they promised. Combined with DirecTV's crappy service and customer service, it was a disaster. Dish won't be any better. Does anyone honestly think a 4th carrier's going to swoop in and start competing, and offering great deals with a great network? If so, I have oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.