T-Mobile CEO Legere has a message to those "haters" opposed to the merger with Sprint



T-Mobile is still awaiting Justice Department approval for its proposed $26.5 billion merger with Sprint. And for T-Mobile CEO John Legere, the deal brings back memories of the carrier's merger six years ago with pre-paid provider MetroPCS. As the executive pointed out in a video released today, "the same group of people are making the same ridiculous arguments" against the T-Mobile-Sprint deal that they made against the T-Mobile-MetroPCS transaction.

So let's look at the arguments that Legere says were made against the T-Mobile-MetroPCS deal and how they worked out in reality. First, Legere pointed out that the "haters" said that T-Mobile's GSM network wouldn't be able to integrate with Metro's CDMA service. What really happened was that 70% of Metro customers were moved over to T-Mobile's network in just 15 months. A little more than 9 months later, all Metro customers had been migrated to T-Mobile's service. This dovetails with the current deal because T-Mobile remains a GSM carrier while Sprint uses CDMA. No wonder Legere says that he has had deja vu moments lately. He points out that compared with 2013, these former MetroPCS customers are consuming 12 times more data each month at a lower price.

A merged T-Mobile-Sprint will put more pressure on Verizon and AT&T


After the merger closed, the MetroPCS name did not go away as critics had thought. Instead, the unit, now called Metro by T-Mobile, is thriving. The brand is offered in 77 markets up from 17 at the time the transaction closed. The number of stores increased from 4,500 to more than 10,000 nationwide as the number of Metro customers rose from 8.9 million to 19 million. And similar to today, when the Communication Workers of America (CWA) says that the T-Mobile-Sprint merger will lead to huge job losses, unions also believed the same thing about the T-Mobile-MetroPCS deal. But combining the latter two firms led to the creation of "tens of thousands of new jobs" according to Legere. And while MetroPCS customers had a limited choice of handsets to purchase before T-Mobile bought the company, today the pre-paid carrier offers many of the "hottest" new Android and iOS phones.


The Department of Justice is concerned that eliminating one of the four major U.S. carriers will lead to less competition for wireless services in the states. As we've pointed out a number of times, it would seem to us that a merged T-Mobile-Sprint would put even more pressure on Verizon and AT&T. After all, T-Mobile is the fastest growing of the four majors right now. And T-Mobile's 600MHz low-frequency spectrum meshes well with Sprint's huge inventory of mid-range 2.5GHz airwaves.

Last week, a report indicated that DOJ antitrust chief Makan Delrahim would approve the T-Mobile-Sprint merger if the two wireless providers help create a new carrier to replace Sprint. Both companies are also open to divesting some of their wireless spectrum and have already agreed to sell Sprint's Boost Mobile prepaid unit. That led to further speculation that Amazon is interested in buying Boost. The latter is believed to have 7 to 8 million subscribers and analysts say the division could be sold for as much as $4.5 billion if wireless spectrum is included in the deal. A company like Amazon could quickly build up Boost and might satisfy the DOJ's request for a new competitor in the industry.

FEATURED VIDEO

9 Comments

1. Larry_ThaGr81

Posts: 592; Member since: May 26, 2011

Looking forward to the closing of this merger.

2. Goochbuntu

Posts: 1; Member since: Jun 07, 2019

I would like to see this merger blocked. Lowering prices won't happen. Especially since TMobile is around 5 dollars less than Verizon currently. Lowering prices won't happen. And the merger only helps TMobile but not the consumer. How about no on the merger and just have Amazon buy Sprint and they run the 5g show for us. And actually give us good customer service for instead of the lies from TMobile. Especially in the Utah market where zero money from TMobile got invested in fixing the towers here. Only Sprint invested in this area. But the merger won't benefit me if they merge. And they just want to lower costs and increase profit . Only 3 year promise isn't good enough when I had TMobile before and been lied to so many times. And yes I'm on mint so I still feel the horrible network that they haven't updated since the voicestream days. But att and verizon is guilty in Utah for sucking

3. Maverick1

Posts: 33; Member since: Sep 30, 2012

Wholeheartedly agree!

6. talon95

Posts: 1000; Member since: Jul 31, 2012

I disagree. Unless you work for Verizon this is a good deal for consumers. Verizon and ATT need competition, especially in 5G, and that only happens with another major player in the market. A bunch of small carriers isn't going to help, we need more big ones. And if Sprint and T-Mobile can't get good 5G they won't compete at all. This isn't really an option, the merger has to happen if we want any future competition, Sprint will be bankrupt at some point if it doesn't, and T-Mobile won't be successful without the extra bandwidth.

4. Maverick1

Posts: 33; Member since: Sep 30, 2012

In 2014 the government blocked / shutdown any merger buyout of T-Mobile by Sprint. THIS is no different so on that note say no to this merger, the buyout of Sprint by T-Mobile. It's as simple as that! Get over it legere.

5. inFla

Posts: 127; Member since: Aug 17, 2018

The worst merging with the next to worst.

7. Tipus

Posts: 893; Member since: Sep 30, 2016

Keep telling that to yourself :)

8. Larry_ThaGr81

Posts: 592; Member since: May 26, 2011

Call it what you want but it's looking more and more likely that it's going to happen.

9. DarthJarJar

Posts: 62; Member since: Feb 01, 2018

Sprints a cancer and TMobile is going downhill soon. I’m going to switch to Verizon or Att if it goes through. Sprint is filled with the shadiest reps and upper management. Not to mention the same people in charge of fixing the network are probably gonna start working for Tmobile too. You’re just breeding one unethical company with a company that has potential on its own.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.