Samsung's foundry allegedly asked Apple to pay 20% more for each processor it supplies
posted by Daniel P. / Nov 12, 2012, 2:17 AM
made in its Austin, Texas foundry, by 20%. The iPhone 5 teardown pegged its processor price at $17.5, but it's not clear whether that already reflects the price hike, or the price will be about $21 from now on. Either way, not a big deal, apparently, considering the $600+ Apple charges for the iPhone.Sources of the Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo are reporting that Samsung has recently hiked the price for production of Apple's AX line of processors, which are likely
Apple was supposedly not very pleased with the idea, but in the end agreed to pay a few bucks more per mobile device for the silicon, which includes the blazing fast chip in the iPad 4. Samsung delivered 130 million processors to Apple last year, and is expected to reach 200 million this one, reflecting Apple's growing sales of phones and tablets.
The two company have a long term contract, which, however, is due to expire in 2014, and we'd imagine by that time Apple would have switched from Samsung's foundry for the most part. Thus, the Koreans are trying to milk their current monopoly, and compensate somewhat for the diminished screen orders, where its Mobile Display unit was mostly replaced as a supplier by LG, Japan Display Co. and Sharp.
As well they should. Turnabout is fair play as they say.
posted on Nov 12, 2012, 2:21 AM 8
Great move, SS needs the money to pay for litigation caused by Apple.
posted on Nov 12, 2012, 2:49 AM 7
Yes, how dare Apple make the iPhone before Samsung had thought to make a device like it, which is compounded by Apple then forcing Samsung to copy it in totality. The nerve of Cupertino doing all of those things to a tiny Korean company who is innocent and worthy of our compassion.
posted on Nov 12, 2012, 3:00 AM 3
Posts: 4974; Member since: Mar 04, 2010
Copying "in totality" would mean that Samsung took an iphone, and replaced the apple logos with their own. Do they look similar, yes. Are they identical, no. There are literally thousands of different products that are as similar as the Galaxy S is to the iphone. TVs, washers, dryers, dishwashers, microwaves, refrigerators, dvd players, bluray players, vcrs, desktop PCs, laptops, home stereo equipment, car stereo equipment, personal audio players, cordless phones, etc. But for some reason, the only industries with ongoing lawsuits are the ones Apple is involved in. This attitude of Apple created everything and no one else did is getting old. You've got to admit, most of the stuff that apple has patented, while convenient, is not necessary for the phone to be a phone or to connect to the net. But with those technologies, Apple simply uses them until taken to court over them. Everyone here will bring up that the android oems can't sue over FRAND patents. But they can require payment for using said patents, and Apple tries to use their position to pay a lower price than anyone else does, which would actually violate FRAND. And if they have to take them to court to get it then they should. It's no different than a landlord taking a tenant to court to not paying their rent.
posted on Nov 12, 2012, 9:10 AM 3
Posts: 2198; Member since: Jan 16, 2011
The only problem is that Samsung needs to sell 47,619,047 AX processors to meet that $1Bn court ruling... :(
posted on Nov 12, 2012, 3:39 AM 1
Posts: 2155; Member since: Oct 29, 2012
Love it! Funny how the bully thinks he can push Samsung around when he depends on that company. In the meantime the bullied kid is quietly turning the world around Apple, and before you know, it's a damn bad place the be a bully! :)
posted on Nov 12, 2012, 2:59 AM 0
Posts: 1412; Member since: Sep 29, 2012
Apple will simply pass on the 20% cost to their customers, so it won't effect them at all.
posted on Nov 12, 2012, 5:08 AM 2
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):