Samsung Galaxy S9+ vs LG V30: first look

Last fall, LG surprised many with its video-centric V30 smartphone, which many claimed to be one of the most underrated phones released last year. Now that the Samsung Galaxy S9+ has been officially announced, the V30 is going to be seeing stiff competition with this latest member into the dual-camera club. Packing the latest hardware, along with a brand-new camera configuration, the S9+ is surely going to be the talk of the town for a bit! The LG V30, on the other hand, will want to keep the conversation squarely to itself.


Employing that oh-so premium metal meets glass construction, these giant-sized smartphones have several stunning qualities about their designs. For starters, both are available in various color, but it's especially enchanting how light bounces beautifully off their glass surfaces in a radiant fashion! Ultimately, though, it's a tough decision to concretely say who has the better-looking design.

The Galaxy S9+ is both taller and thicker, while the V30 is marginally wider, but regardless of that, we can verify that they're still a handful to operate. Other similarities between the designs include their water resistant IP68 constructions, rear planted fingerprint sensors, USB Type-C ports, and 3.5mm headphone jacks. However, the S9+ flaunts dual speakers that are tuned by AKG and offer support for Dolby Atmos – so there's more substance behind its audio punch!


When it comes to displays, these two don't disappoint with what they offer, just because they're exceptionally detailed, offer wide viewing angles, and punchy colors – the hallmark qualities of OLED technology. The S9+ flaunts the larger 6.2-inch 1440 x 2960 Super AMOLED display, but the V30 technically offers a higher pixel density count because of its smaller 6-inch 1440 x 2880 POLED display. In reality, however, you wouldn't be able to tell who has the better details.

We will note that the V30 exhibits a slightly bluish tone at wide angles with its display. It's not terribly distracting, but it's nonetheless still discernable if you look closely. All told, it's tough to make a concrete decision as to which of the two is superior. From this cursory inspection, we're inclined to mention the S9+, which is supplemented by those slick dual curved edges, but only time will tell if it really delivers superior qualities over the V30.

User Interface

Frankly speaking, there's not a huge overall to the new Samsung Experience running on the S9+ – it's very similar to what we found on the Note 8 and S8+ previously. LG's custom experience running on top of Android follows a very similar strategy with its clean and minimalist experience. It's seriously interesting to see how the two rivals follow one another, evident in features like the Edge Panel with the S9+ for creating quick shortcuts, as well as the similar functioning floating bar with the V30.

While the core experiences remain the same for these two giants, we will have to give the S9+ the nods for throwing in several features that really expand its functionality. From its new AR Emoji feature that creates a 3D avatar of yourself, to the desktop-like experience with Samsung DeX, Samsung has really been working meticulously to show that its latest offering is endowed with features you won't typically find in other devices!

Quickly running through the software and interface, they exhibit the same buttery responses that we'd expect to see from high caliber phones. Then again, the S9+ should benefit from being powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SoC. Sure, we know that the Snapdragon 835 chip powering the V30 isn't a slouch, as it's more than capable of handling gaming, but the optimizations made to the Snapdragon 845 should outperform its older relative.


Dual cameras are in play with these two, but their implementations are totally different. Whereas the dual camera setup on the V30, a 16MP sensor paired with a wide-angle 13MP one, delivers wider coverage for shooting photos and videos, the 12MP dual cameras on the S9+ enables it to produce those portrait shots with bokehlicious backgrounds. In addition to that, the S9+ setup delivers an astounding wide aperture of f/1.5 – edging out the f/1.6 aperture of the V30.

Indeed, the hardware packed into the S9+ is compelling, we won't know if it's indeed better than the V30 until we put it through some proper testing. Low-light is mentioned as being a specialty for the S9+, so we're eager to see how it stacks up against the V30.

Over on the video side, the LG V30 continues to enthrall for being one of the very few to offer true manual video controls, which is something that content creators really appreciate. And it helps, too, that the wide-angle lens allows for some intriguing perspectives that other cameras are unable to obtain. Still, we will certainly agree that the S9+'s 960 FPS capture at 720p will make for some astounding slow-motion footage – besting the 240 FPS rate ay 720p with the V30.


The specs would indicate that the S9+ has a slight advantage with its 3500 mAh battery, a slight step up over the V30's 3300 mAh capacity. Nevertheless, we'll have to put the S9+ through our usual testing to uncover if it's indeed a better performer. At the very least, these two offer their respective fast-charging and wireless charging solutions.


The LG V30 solidified itself as a serious contender over the holiday season for its high-end specs, video capturing features, luxury amenities, and most importantly, a price point that undercut its main rivals at the time. From the looks of it, the S9+ will be priced somewhere around $840 to $930 depending on the carrier – while the V30 fetches for around $800 currently.

Factoring how the S9+ is flaunting some newer hardware, the miniscule difference between the two is almost insignificant – making it appear as though the S9+ would be the better buy. Naturally, there are several things to consider before making a final decision. Take for instance their cameras, wherein one specializes in photography, while the other takes pride in video. It's a tough call regardless, but it'll be only a matter of time before we can pass judgment.

Related phones

Galaxy S9+
  • Display 6.2" 1440 x 2960 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 8 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Octa-core, 2800 MHz
  • Storage 64 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3500 mAh(35h talk time)
  • Display 6.0" 1440 x 2880 pixels
  • Camera 16 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, Octa-core, 2450 MHz
  • Storage 64 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3300 mAh(16.5h talk time)



1. rsiders

Posts: 1960; Member since: Nov 17, 2011

I'll wait for final reviews as I got a little too excited today just from the price of the S9+ on T-Mobile. If Samsung made any improvements in battery life I don't think there are any more questions for me.

9. bur60

Posts: 981; Member since: Jul 07, 2014

Yea same, except I couldn't wait and wanted to get it asap heh.

2. shield

Posts: 843; Member since: Sep 12, 2015

LG V30 looks more good.

3. biostangoodtang1984

Posts: 36; Member since: Feb 14, 2018

Samsung Galaxy S9+ is better than LG V30...

4. chicchaz

Posts: 3; Member since: Dec 31, 2015

I'm happy (and staying with) my V30. I'm not one who cares much about looks, but the S9 is plain ugly especially compared to the beautiful V30. Under the hood, I'm happy to not have TouchWiz. Specs only tell you part of the story. User experience is king IMO.

5. ShadowUnleashed

Posts: 88; Member since: Feb 08, 2018

The S9 doesn't have TouchWiz either.

6. chicchaz

Posts: 3; Member since: Dec 31, 2015

So Sammy's no longer mangling Android on their phones? My ol' S4 was a mess.

7. ShadowUnleashed

Posts: 88; Member since: Feb 08, 2018

It all changed from the Galaxy S6 on. That's why it's not even called TouchWiz anymore. It's a much more solid skin now. No lags whatsoever, and with the Oreo update it got even faster than it was on Nougat.

12. chicchaz

Posts: 3; Member since: Dec 31, 2015

Hmm, now you've got me thinking about replacing my trashed V30 with the S9+. Thanks.

10. Krjal

Posts: 431; Member since: Dec 19, 2013

At this point they're both so close in raw specs and performance anyone would likely be happy with either. Basically just down to personal preference and finding a good deal now. I'm glad LG has made so much progress with its OLED displays that it can compete directly with Samsung. They're not *quite* up to Samsung's quality just yet but they're getting there.

11. LumiaLover

Posts: 237; Member since: Sep 27, 2012

I went for the V30, which is currently half the price of the S9+ on contract £33 per month vs £68. I'm sure the Galaxy is a great device but I'm really enjoying my V30 at the moment and I see no reason to change. Perhaps later in the year, when the price of the S9+ drops significantly, I may be tempted to give it a go. Well done to both companies though in producing outstanding devices.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.