Right to Repair bill killed, do you think the iPhone is really 'too complex' to fix on your own?
Say what you will about trends, but when they get to California, and the Silicon Valley in particular, the stakes usually get sky high, and its landmark electronics repair legislation proposal is no different. Introduced by Assemblywoman Susan Talamantes-Eggman, D-Stockton, the California Right to Repair Act seeks to mandate Apple and other gadget makers, to make their repair manuals and guidelines available to everyone - from users, to small independent repair shops.
While the "Right to repair" movement was gaining steam here in the US, Apple, and the industry as a whole, weren't sitting still, and argued that it will be consumers that will suffer in the end from unauthorized fixers with dubious aftermarket parts. The fight has been waged abroad as well, for the surprise of one Henrik Huseby, owner of a small unauthorized iPhone repair shops in the great country of Norway.
German bike paths, coffee shops, and Norwegian repair centers.We don't know what's with Apple's European lobbyists and lawyers, but they seem to be pretty actively seeking to gang up on seemingly unworthy victims, like
After getting a shipment of iPhone screens from Hong Kong seized at customs last year, Mr Huseby was contacted by Apple lawyers who tried to sweet-talk him into signing an agreement not to use or distribute such parts any more. No way, he said and, knowing the liberal Norwegian system, hired an attorney: "They threw all kinds of claims against me and told me the laws and acted so friendly and just wanted me to sign the letter so it would all be over. I had a good lawyer that completely understood the problem, did good research, and read the law correctly." Long story short, since the iPhone 6 and 6s displays in question were refurbished using genuine Apple parts from broken iPhones, the court sided with the repair shop owner.
In California, however, the Right to Repair Act proponents had no such luck. Here's an excerpt from their bill:
The Right to Repair Act defenders say that in the last two decades, manufacturers have monopolized repairs by withholding manuals, and introducing custom parts, down to the pentalobe screws that Apple had in its iPhones. While they may sound a bit Luddite, the proposal put California among the many states where such laws are considered. Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Cisco and other tech giants have been fighting tooth and nail against their passage, though, as, they argue, they want to control the repair process to ensure safety and environmental compliance.
After a media backlash, they established a lobbying firm, CompTIA, to deal with the bill, and it sent people to the California State Assembly's Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee. The lobbyists brought a disassembled iPhone as an exhibit, reports Motherboard, gunning to show how inadvertently piercing the lithium-ion battery inside may result in thermal runaway and injuries. An Apple exec is even on record saying that iPhones are "too complex" to repair by anyone but staff in authorized centers.
The Commitee hearing was supposed to take place on Tuesday, but Assemblywoman Susan Talamantes-Eggman, the bill's sponsor, decided to pull it in the last minute, realizing that the industry's lobbying efforts against the California Right to Repair Act, has born fruit. Her full statement on the withdrawal puts it rather succinctly:
Ultimately, Apple has agreed to provide select third-party repair shops with the option to buy genuine parts from it and replace them on its own, as part of a new program called "Apple Genuine Parts Repair." It can be a quiet new way to comply with an eventual Right to Repair legislation passing if it comed down the road, or it could be a bargaining chip for tech company lobbyists to prevent such bills from being considered in the first place. In any case, the California Right to Repair Act bill is now withdrawn because... iPhones exploding in the hands of laymen and things.
This is why we wanted to ask you if you are on the side of the tech companies that argue that it is a health, privacy and environmental hazard if third-party repairmen are given the option to fix their products, or are you of the opinion that, say, iPhones are not "too complex" to repair in unauthorized by Apple shops?