Results: Face ID doesn't exactly have a full vote of confidence

It's not the Face ID that drives the phone price up, its the trapped Apple customers. The Face ID system costs $16, as revealed from the iPhone X component price breakdown. And the R&D was already done, Microsoft had it in Xbox Kinect and still has it in Surface Pro 4 and Pro 2017, Surface Book, etc.

Face ID is more secure than Touch ID mathematical wise but not for certain situations. Like twins and vip. You should not use either if security is that much of an issue. Use the number log in. But hey any one of these can be broken because The number log in is the backup option when you can’t get Face or finger right. That can be had with a camera while watching you log in. The I phone is secure enough that the fbi can’t get in but really if somebody had your phone and did not have you around to force you to put in the code than software wise there is always sombody that can get some info on the internet and or find sombody to bypass all that stuff and get into your phone. I am pretty sure that nobody is going to make a sculpture of me and jack into my phone. To do what as she’ll. To get is theft you can get other info out there to do the same thing. This whole fiasco about the Face ID has more to do with who like Apple and who is buying into these articals. It’s a very small percentage. Small enough that you don’t need to worry about it. If you do than you wouldn’t be spilling comments on phone arena because you would have more things to worry about. Also if you got that much secure info that you think sombody wants on your phone than you need to be smarter on how you store that info. Because like I said if sombody wanted to get into any smartphone out ther (and I mean all) then they could figure out some way.

It's ironic to hear someone like you talking about a display being proven best scientifically, when folks like you couldn't accept the results from displaymate the past 3 years. From people who insisted that 312 PPI was all you needed, and you couldn't see a difference beyond that.

Apple bought primesense and develop face id. same Company microsoft used to create kinect. Since 2015 microsoft has Face verification feature same as face id in their device like surface pro 4. i cant understand why people keep saying it will take time for Apple competitors to implement technology like that. Ist Apple the one who play catch up here?

Your logic is flawed and makes no sense.

Learn proper grammar and spelling please.

Well Touch ID(FPS) is nothing if only to unlock the phone. Real use is for payment. And Apple wasn't first. But anyway, not Apple, but Samsung made the best Pay system. PS How FaceID is the future, when with FPS you can do it without to put it to the face?

We've had face unlock for 5 plus years, yes I understand Apple has implemented better technology, but it hasn't really caught on or been popular yet. Now Apple is forcing it as the only biometric lock. Personally I don't like the idea of picking my phone up and holding it at the right angle to my face to unlock it, I also don't like having FPS located on the back of a phone. The FPS in a home button like Apple and Samsung had is the most convienent IMO.

That Apple copied it, just like they did face ID? Yeah, I remember that too.