Nexus 5 performance review: the tale of benchmarks

Nexus 5 performance review: the tale of benchmarks
The Nexus 5 has arrived and it is a powerhouse of a phone that you can buy for nearly half the price of other top-shelf models. Just how powerful is it, though? It’s time to push its limits with benchmarks and see whether it can hold its own against rivals.

The Nexus 5 is powered by the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 system chip with Adreno 330 graphics. This is the same chip used in all latest top of the line devices like the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Sony Xperia Z1 and the LG G2. Even though the performance of these devices differs slightly (the different amount of RAM and other factors matter), keep in mind that all of them should be on about the same level. Then, there is the new iPhone 5s with Apple’s A7 system chip and the move to 64-bit. We’ll take a look at how all these different architectures compare.

1. CPU Explained
1.1. Nexus 5 scores into top 3 on Sunspider
1.2. Kraken is not a test for cheaters
2. GPU: Play on
2.1. Basemark: Trailing close behind
2.2. GFXBench: the iPhone is the limit
3. Conclusion: best value for the money

*Disclaimer: Almost all manufacturers (except for Apple and Google Nexus devices!) cheat certain benchmarks by forcing CPU and GPU clock speeds to their peak capacity. This is an unusual behaviour for the otherwise varying clock speeds of the CPU and GPU and does not reflect the actual behaviour of a smartphone. This unusual behaviour happens after the handset detects it’s running a specific benchmark applications. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is particularly guilty having the largest list of apps it cheats, but others like the Samsung Galaxy S4, HTC One and LG G2 are also cheating in some apps.

1. CPU Explained


Nexus 5 performance review: the tale of benchmarks
The Snapdragon 800 (MSM8974 model) in the Nexus 5 is a quad-core chip and it succeeds the Snapdragon 600 used in devices like the Samsung Galaxy S4 and the HTC One. Naturally, it’s an improvement in almost every aspect. (Right now, HTC is the only big phone maker that does not yet have a device powered by this chip, but this could change early next year.)

Now, Snapdragon is the name of the whole system chip. Each of the processing cores is of the latest Krait 400 type, an improvement over the Krait 300 used in the Snapdragon 600 series. One of the most notable differences is that Krait 400 is manufactured using TSMC’s new 28nm HPm process, a more advanced manufacturing technique allowing for optimizations in power usage and an increase in clock speeds. The Nexus 5 can thus run at clock speeds of up to 2.3GHz. Earlier devices with Krait 300 processing cores and Snapdragon 600 could only reach a maximum of 1.9GHz.

It’s a 3-wide out-of-order chip supporting a fairly deep 11-stage pipeline. It is characterized by the comparative reduced latency to main memory and a quicker L2 cache. The whole architecture is a 32-bit one, something that is bound to change on Android soon, and that has already changed in Apple’s ecosystem as it introduced its 64-bit Apple A7 earlier this year and it powers the iPhone 5s, iPad Air and iPad mini with Retina. Faring it against the A7, you'd notice that Apple uses 4 times more Level 1 cache (a type of static and extremely fast memory where often accessed data is stored), but half the L2 cache.

In the case of the Nexus 5, the Snapdragon 800 system chip works alongside 2GB of 32-bit dual-channel 800MHz LP-DDR3 RAM, the same as on the LG G2. 

1.1. Nexus 5 scores into top 3: Sunspider


The first test we run to see how the Nexus 5 fares against its rivals is the Sunspider Javascript Benchmark that measures on-browser javascript performance. The Nexus 5 scores into the top 3, an achievement that is quite remarkable given that it is actually more affordable than other phones and still outperforms them.

Keep in mind that Sunspider is the target of specific optimizations by various chip makers (definitely Qualcomm), so Snapdragon devices are unsurprisingly among the best ones here.

Lower is better
Sony Xperia Z1
746.2
HTC One
977.9
Samsung Galaxy S4
1082.9
LG G2
932.8
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
599
Apple iPhone 5s
415.7
Google Nexus 5
723.9

Mozilla Kraken is another stressful javascript benchmark. The Nexus 5 slips to the fifth place here, trailing closely behind its LG G2 Snapdragon 800 forefather. One notable thing is that unlike the widely popular Sunspider, Kraken is not the subject of optimizations by chip and phone makers.

Lower is better
Sony Xperia Z1
7636
HTC One
14598
Samsung Galaxy S4
12227
LG G2
7812
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
7917.6
Apple iPhone 5s
5931.8
Google Nexus 5
8871.7

2. GPU: Play on


The Nexus 5 features the Adreno 330 graphical chip running at clock speeds of up to 450MHz. This is the exact same peak frequency of the Adreno 320 (coming packed into the Snapragon 600 chip), but with optimizations and more resources, the Adreno 330 emerges as a clear winner over its predecessor. In the near future, we expect to see the very same Adreno 330 pushed to 550MHz in the MSM8974AB chip and some manufacturers like Chinese Xiaomi have already confirmed working on devices with this improved GPU. No other major phone maker has officially announced plans for such a device so far, though. The benchmark tests below show just how much of a difference it makes.

2.1. Basemark: Trailing close behind

The first benchmark we’ll look at to measure graphics performance is Basemark X 1.0. It runs game simulations on-screen and at 1080p off-screen. The Nexus 5 has a 1080p display, but since the on-screen buttons take up some of the space, the actual on-screen resolution is in effect slightly smaller so the device pushes less megapixels in the test and it’s on screen results are slightly higher.

For some devices like the iPhone 5s, though, the difference between on-screen and off-screen results is staggering because of the huge difference between the comparatively low resolution of its 4-inch display and the high resolution for offscreen tests.

Looking at the actual results, you’d see that the iPhone 5s leads but the Galaxy Note 3 is a close runner-up. Taking into account that the Note 3 has been proved to cheat this particular benchmark, we would say the Nexus 5 scores brilliantly here - on par with the Xperia Z1 and even outperforming its LG G2 forefather.

It’s also worth mentioning that this is a very stressful graphics test and we expect it to be at least a year until 1080p devices start hitting the coveted 30fps smooth framerate mark here.

Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1
14.215
HTC One
7.677
Samsung Galaxy S4
8.566
LG G2
12.772
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
16.417
Apple iPhone 5s
16.757
Google Nexus 5
14.024

Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1
17.007
HTC One
8.236
Samsung Galaxy S4
9.148
LG G2
14.662
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
18.1
Apple iPhone 5s
27.685
Google Nexus 5
17.342

GFXBench, formerly known as GL Benchmark, is one of the most GPU-intensive tests out there and it gives a detailed breakdown of a video card’s performance. Fill rates (the number of pixels a video card renders and writes to video memory) are the first thing we evaluate and you’d see that Apple is the clear leader, smoking all other devices.

We recommend you take a look at our detailed iPhone 5s performance review where we explain the amazing PowerVR G6430 graphics chip that powers Apple’s latest flagship.

As to the Nexus 5, it again scores perfectly on par with the Note 3 and Xperia Z1, its peers by platform.

Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1
1372.3
HTC One
883.7
Samsung Galaxy S4
820.4
LG G2
1240.9
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
1393
Apple iPhone 5s
3317.1
Google Nexus 5
1361

The final two tests are another stressful game simulation - T-Rex. The Galaxy Note 3 pulls ahead here, and - interestingly - without any cheating. The device almost crushes the 30fps threshold. The Nexus 5 has the same Adreno 330 graphics chip, but scores a slightly lower 23 fps.

The T-Rex HD component of GFXBench is a demanding, GPU-centric test that simulates a graphically-intensive gaming environment on the screen. The results achieved are measured in frames per second, with more frames being better.

Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1
23
HTC One
14
Samsung Galaxy S4
16
LG G2
21
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
26
Apple iPhone 5s
35
Google Nexus 5
23

Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1
21
HTC One
15
Samsung Galaxy S4
16
LG G2
20
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
26
Apple iPhone 5s
23
Google Nexus 5
21

All in all, the Nexus 5 performs admirably. A $350 device, it is perfectly on par with much more expensive top-shelf Android phones when it comes to performance. It is clear that Google is subsidizing this handset hugely and just looking at the charts above you should not have any doubt this is the best value for the money device currently on the market.

Still, it is obvious that Apple’s iPhone 5s remains the top performer with its A7 system chip. Its advantage is not huge, but It’s clearly there. Comparing it to other Android devices, though, the Nexus 5 offers just as much in both CPU and GPU muscle.

The Nexus lineup first arrived with the idea to showcase the best of the Android platform, and more recently - the best of Android at an extremely affordable price. The Nexus 5 is no exception to that rule when it comes to its computing power.

Sunspider Lower is better
Sony Xperia Z1 746.2
HTC One 977.9
Samsung Galaxy S4 1082.9
LG G2 932.8
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 599
Apple iPhone 5s 415.7
Google Nexus 5 723.9
Mozilla Kraken Lower is better
Sony Xperia Z1 7636
HTC One 14598
Samsung Galaxy S4 12227
LG G2 7812
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 7917.6
Apple iPhone 5s 5931.8
Google Nexus 5 8871.7
Basemark X off-screen Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1 14.215
HTC One 7.677
Samsung Galaxy S4 8.566
LG G2 12.772
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 16.417
Apple iPhone 5s 16.757
Google Nexus 5 14.024
Basemark X on-screen Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1 17.007
HTC One 8.236
Samsung Galaxy S4 9.148
LG G2 14.662
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 18.1
Apple iPhone 5s 27.685
Google Nexus 5 17.342
GFXBench Fill Rate off-screen Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1 1372.3
HTC One 883.7
Samsung Galaxy S4 820.4
LG G2 1240.9
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 1393
Apple iPhone 5s 3317.1
Google Nexus 5 1361
GFXBench T-Rex HD on-screen Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1 23
HTC One 14
Samsung Galaxy S4 16
LG G2 21
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 26
Apple iPhone 5s 35
Google Nexus 5 23
GFXBench T-Rex HD off-screen Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1 21
HTC One 15
Samsung Galaxy S4 16
LG G2 20
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 26
Apple iPhone 5s 23
Google Nexus 5 21

Related phones

Nexus 5
  • Display 5.0" 1080 x 1920 pixels
  • Camera 8 MP / 1.3 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 800, Quad-core, 2260 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB
  • Battery 2300 mAh

FEATURED VIDEO

103 Comments

1. zekes

Posts: 230; Member since: Aug 14, 2012

Damn the iPhone is the big lilltle beast

35. noler

Posts: 326; Member since: Aug 19, 2013

I think a lot of crying will be here.

61. brrunopt

Posts: 742; Member since: Aug 15, 2013

Except is not.. Those CPU "benchs" (not sure you can call them that since they are sh*t) are single core , the iPhone beeing a dual core has a huge advantage... ----

63. brrunopt

Posts: 742; Member since: Aug 15, 2013

Geekbench Multicore: Apple A7 (ipad Air) - 2,782 S800 (Note 3) - ~ 3000 S800 (Note 3) - ~ 2800

66. rd_nest

Posts: 1656; Member since: Jun 06, 2010

+1 PA like all other so-called reviewers are simply ignorant to use Javascripts benchmarks as CU benchmarks. Most of these are largely single-threaded benchs and highly dependent on software instead of actual CPU performance. Just look at recent Android phones - Note 3, G2, XZ1 and N5. All these have different SunSpider scores even though they use the exact same CPU. All it means who optimizes best for Javascript wins the race. Moral of the story: All PA editors (and most so-called reviewers) are bunch of idiots.

73. darkkjedii

Posts: 30483; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

You mad bro? Here I'll let you play with my 5S, that'll make you feel better.

77. brrunopt

Posts: 742; Member since: Aug 15, 2013

"argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument"

93. Smokin

Posts: 120; Member since: Oct 10, 2013

LOL the resolution is only half of Note 3 and the gang lol. It's not even HD

96. kmaheynoway

Posts: 4; Member since: Nov 14, 2013

Unless I am misunderstanding you, I must conclude you're an under-informed iphone/samsung lover. The nexus five has a 1920x1080 display (441ppi,) HD is considered 1080x720.

100. Paximos

Posts: 276; Member since: Jul 26, 2012

He's been smokin...

103. Smokin

Posts: 120; Member since: Oct 10, 2013

i'm talkin bout the iphone.

2. SAYED-EJAZ

Posts: 225; Member since: Oct 10, 2013

Apple in GFXBench :o

62. brrunopt

Posts: 742; Member since: Aug 15, 2013

do you even know what the "FILL RATE" means ? it won't translate to actual performance,..

65. rd_nest

Posts: 1656; Member since: Jun 06, 2010

On-screen? do you understand the difference between on-screen and off-screen? Fill-rate? It's a low level test and everyone knows the PowerVR uses tile-based rendering and has massive fill rates compared to other architectures. That doesn't mean sh!t in actual performance.

3. Nathan_ingx

Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

I'll get one the day Google treats every country equal (on pricing).

67. lifeyourlive

Posts: 126; Member since: Aug 23, 2013

Wow very nicely said!

4. Qbancelli

Posts: 75; Member since: Mar 11, 2010

I'm convinced the main reason for this article was to show the iphone's superiority.

9. alterecho

Posts: 1106; Member since: Feb 23, 2012

The article reads:"Nexus 5 performance review" iPhone release date:September 2013 Nexus 5 release date:November 2013 Its logical to spotlight the newer Nexus 5's performance compared to the phones already in market. You want the iPhone 5s to be left out of the benchmarks since it beats Nexus 5 and every other phone except on one test?

11. rusticguy

Posts: 2828; Member since: Aug 11, 2012

Why not include 5C also ?

21. Ninetysix

Posts: 2931; Member since: Oct 08, 2012

You can if you're smart enough to do it. Hopefully you can figure it out.

22. alterecho

Posts: 1106; Member since: Feb 23, 2012

I didn't write this article, but if you would like to see it, theres a dropdown, below each benchmark. You can include the 5 (5C) from there.

10. rusticguy

Posts: 2828; Member since: Aug 11, 2012

Ancel Keys did the same thing when he proved FAT is bad for heart ... this is called "Cherry Picking"

42. jove39

Posts: 2135; Member since: Oct 18, 2011

A7 soc in iPhone5s is undoubtedly most powerful arm soc with v8 instruction-set...except exynos 5420...And I have ordered N5...can't wait for it...but I respect work apple engineers have done for A7.

97. kmaheynoway

Posts: 4; Member since: Nov 14, 2013

What gives the leg up to the iPhone processor is that everything is highly optimized, and it has a 64 bit processor. With android, nothing is optimized really, because not a single manufacturer makes the phones. iPhones are only made by apple and only run their os giving them the ability to optimize the phone to it's max potential, unlike with android. I am an android fanboy, don't get me wrong, but apple definitely has it's strings together.

102. conix67

Posts: 1; Member since: Nov 21, 2013

Each Android phone manufacturer has a chance to optimize theirs as well, that itself isn't the limiting factor. Let alone optimization, they are struggling to provide OS updates. These companies want to make money, while spending the least possible, that's all.

5. alterecho

Posts: 1106; Member since: Feb 23, 2012

Thats a nice showing by Apple in all except one of the benchmarks.

18. tech2

Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012

True. But Nexus 5 is almost equivalent's to iPhone5s' performance at half the price..............so no complains here !

23. alterecho

Posts: 1106; Member since: Feb 23, 2012

Some of the benchmarks show the iPhone 5S to be considerably faster than the rest.

26. tech2

Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012

I see no benchmark in which Iphone scores significantly higher score apart from the screen benchmarks......and we both know why iphones performs better in them

33. alterecho

Posts: 1106; Member since: Feb 23, 2012

Sunspider and GFXBench fillrate offscreen.

Latest Stories