Leaked LG L35 apparently aimed at the price-conscious crowd with entry-level specs

Leaked LG L35 apparently aimed at the price-conscious crowd with entry-level specs
LG appears to be prepping a new low-cost, entry-level device, dubbed L35 (D150), according to an UA profile unearthed from LG's very own site. The device in question is nearly identical to what Sony has in store for the price-conscious niche with its still fresh Xperia E1. According to MyLGPhones, the L35 will be released in European countries including Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal, and Hungary.

So far, we have quite some information regarding the specs of LG's upcoming low-end. It's got a 3.2-inch, 320x480 (HVGA) pixel resolution screen, and runs on the latest build of Android Kitkat -- 4.4.2. The L35 is apparently powered by a 1.2GHz, dual-core Snapdragon 200 (MSM8210) chip by Qualcomm, with ARM's Cortex-A7 CPU and Adreno 302 graphics (the same chip running the new Moto E), and 512MB of RAM. The imaging department will make do with a 3-megapixel rear-facing shooter, and there's a 1540 mAh juicer keeping the lights on. The amount of on-board storage, unsurprisingly for this class, sits at just 4GB, though there is a slot for a microSD card (up to 32GB more).

The LG L35 measures in at 109.4 x 59 x 11.9 mm, and weighs 108.4 grams, and we're told to expect to see its body come in both a black and whtie version. It's currently unknown how LG will approach pricing with this very basic device, nor are we aware of the company's plans as far as an official release window is concerned.

source: MyLGPhones [1], [2] via LGMobileIndia 

FEATURED VIDEO

15 Comments

1. Planterz

Posts: 2120; Member since: Apr 30, 2012

Sounds craptacular.

4. pokharkarsaga

Posts: 556; Member since: Feb 23, 2012

They are trying to compete with moto e but failed.Moto is the new nokia for android.hope lenovo doesn't spoil the taste.

6. Felix_Gatto

Posts: 942; Member since: Jul 03, 2013

Samsung's low-end Galaxies are more crapstacular than this.

15. sgodsell

Posts: 7522; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

No, the Nokia X takes all the awards for being the worst Android device, ever.

2. boosook

Posts: 1442; Member since: Nov 19, 2012

I thougth something more entry level than the L40 could not exist... (and, btw, after the Moto E disclosure, everything that was "entry level" has suddendly become "crap")

3. peace247 unregistered

really 3.2-inch, 320x480 screen android 2014!!! i don't believe these companies.....

5. Jishnusur

Posts: 175; Member since: Oct 07, 2013

These phones are not for you mate. There are countries in which people earn less than USD 100 per month. If they want a phone, they don't see the specs like we do. Frankly, they don't even know what screen resolution is. Hope you get it. I just answered the "Why" hehe.. Cheers

12. fireblade

Posts: 717; Member since: Dec 27, 2013

Too bad the cheapest android phone from LG is more than $100. With the same money, we can get more powerful phones like xiaomi, moto E, lenovo... Don't buy low end phones from famous brand. They all sucks

7. h27_Venom

Posts: 76; Member since: May 16, 2014

Still no way near moto e.. it has better screen in terms of size,screen resolution and pixel density scratch and water resistant .. has 1 gb ram has near stock android experience which means less bloatware...

8. Anshulonweb

Posts: 468; Member since: Feb 07, 2014

512mb ram should be illegal in 2014

9. Edward_bly

Posts: 278; Member since: Dec 11, 2013

Well the specs come close to the first htc evo, which was a great phone for its time. I don't see why those who make very little, would be disappointed. The only way I see it competeing against motorola is if this phone cost $30-60.

10. antonioli

Posts: 200; Member since: Sep 08, 2013

I will kick who buy this crap instead of Moto E.

11. Edward_bly

Posts: 278; Member since: Dec 11, 2013

What if it's cheaper than moto e?

14. h27_Venom

Posts: 76; Member since: May 16, 2014

If they are targeting this phone for asian countries like India.Then there are already other local alternative like lava,karboon,micromax that offers better phones for less than $100..so even if it is cheaper than moto e that’s not going to make much of difference.

13. NokiaFTW

Posts: 2072; Member since: Oct 24, 2012

The Moto G is a fantastic smartphone for its price, but not the Moto E. Its competing with the Lumia 525 in its segment, which offers better performance, software support and removable battery, all at a similar price point.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.