Judge says she will probably deny Apple's request to block Amazon's Appstore for Android name
posted by Alan F. / Jun 22, 2011, 8:47 PM
The suit also has allowed for some bickering between Apple and rival Microsoft. The latter has been among the biggest opponents to the use of App Store as a trademark, agreeing with Amazon that the term is generic. Apple's quick response to the guys at Redmond was that if App Store is a generic term, so then is Microsoft Windows. Touche.
Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011
it is alright.. apple is gonna sue the s**t out of all other companies with their newly awarded multitouch/capacitive display patent...
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 8:55 PM 3
Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010
according to thisismynext, not much http://thisismynext.com/2011/0
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 10:15 PM 2
Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010
lol...yea..the pro Apple, iPhone folks need to sit down and read what that patent's really about. Other mobile OS's probably dont even use that right now. The problem is sites and blogs just ran with general titles and it blew up over the web.A typical day in the life of the interwebz...
posted on Jun 23, 2011, 12:22 AM 1
Seriously Apple, seriously? It's sad seeing them sue every company that has anything to do with their iPhone. Apple, the iPhone was cool when it first came out, hell it was even revolutionary at the time, but now it's just outdated and the iPhone 5 probably won't even be on par with the Galaxy S2
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 9:18 PM 3
Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010
The problem for Apple in this lawsuit is that it is pretty hard to confuse "Amazon Appstore for Android" with Apple App Store. It just doesn't pass the smell test. Apple's attorneys are starting to drink the Kool-Aid that the PR types have been selling.
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 9:29 PM 2
Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009
Lol, it just isn't a good day for Apple's legal department. For once I find myself agreeing with the court system's decisions. Apple's argument is ridiculous. Only a retarded developer would take more than two steps without realizing that he can't code an iOS app for an ANDROID APP STORE.
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 10:05 PM 4
Posts: 230; Member since: Jan 17, 2011
Of course you agree with the courts decision, because its against Apple. Why isn't today a good day for Apples legal department? They gave Sasmung a big middle finger today as well as secured a multi-touch patent.
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 11:36 PM 1
Posts: 320; Member since: Jan 26, 2011
Ur an idiot if u think that multi-touch patent means anything, it basically only regards a page within a webpage. The smaller part can't be multi-touch now. Besides google maps what the hell small frame would u want to zoom into? Which no one who has an Android will use google maps on a website when they can just copy the address and open google maps and then use multi-touch. I swear just like any apple user or advocate, you never get all the facts or else you would never buy apple products or try and defend them.
posted on Jun 23, 2011, 1:16 AM 1
Posts: 1496; Member since: Apr 06, 2011
Because we all know these other companies can't be more original rather than copy Apple.
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 10:17 PM 2
Posts: 3616; Member since: Jan 19, 2011
I actually am surprised this one went the way it did. Both are selling apps, both use the name "App store", and Apple was there first with the copyright. The Judge says Apple hasn't proved it would be confusing, but I didn't think that was the point. Copyright laws are there to keep some other company from using your success to promote their like product. Apple shouldn't have to prove confusion, only that Amazon is using a copyrighted name to push a similar product. There is no doubt to that. I am not a huge Apple fan, but I thought this one was pretty clear on their side. If this isn't violating the copyright laws, then why bother copyrighting? Can a new cola distrubuter use the name Coke so long as they add a word? Can a new car company use the term "Ford" so long as they don't confuse people? Weird ruling. Apple better hope the Samsung suit doesn't come to a head soon- they are not on a winning streak in the courts.
posted on Jun 22, 2011, 10:35 PM 1
Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010
You are confusing copyright with trademark. Apple sued Amazon over the App Store trademark. In trademark litigation (at least in the U.S.), the burden of proof is whether the claimed infringement causes confusion in the marketplace. It is pretty hard to confuse Amazon Appstore for Android with the Apple App Store. So far, Apple has not met their burden of proof and the judge seems ready to rule against them.
posted on Jun 23, 2011, 12:30 AM 1
Posts: 2198; Member since: Sep 09, 2010
Oh well. Amazon knows that what they're doing is unethical. They know that they're simply riding on to what Apple has built and made popular. The AppStore. The court may favor Amazon, and it is in a way understandable, but no one can deny that it was Apple who trademarked the term "AppStore" first as part of their Apple AppStore title, and made it a household name for a place to purchase apps for iOS users. Microsoft, Samsung, and even Nokia recognize that, and that's why they came up with their own names for their application stores. Karma is a biatch Amazon, and it will eventually bite you back ;)
posted on Jun 23, 2011, 1:36 AM 0
Again use of the "Microsoft Windows" example is poor at best. 1. Windows is just a generic as Apple... Yet both are valid trademarks in the tech industry (only). 2. Both Windows and Apple are generic, general use words from OTHER areas of the language (outside of computers, computing, technology). Thus the reason why they can be trademarked for the technology market. YES! I could open a car wash called Apple or Windows and they could not sue me (with success at least). App Store - is a generic term (imho) but one whos definition is based in the technology industry, therefore it should not be trademark-able in the same industry (but ok in others like car washes). Apple is defending what was given to them, they should NEVER have received the trademark to begin with.
posted on Jun 23, 2011, 8:26 AM 0
weehee, miihii, miihii.... waaah waah wahh. "im steve jobs and i get credit for inventing everything thats already been invented before... but i still sue when people call something similar to what ive called it" weehee weehii wahh waahh
posted on Jun 23, 2011, 8:34 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):