x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Early Android developer talks how the team had to 'start over' when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone

Early Android developer talks how the team had to 'start over' when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone

Posted: , by Daniel P.

Tags :

Early Android developer talks how the team had to 'start over' when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone
Chris DeSalvo, one of Android's co-creators, confirmed that when they saw what Apple did with the first iPhone, the team immediately realized it has to start over.

Chris was working together with Andy Rubin at Danger, before Microsoft acquired that. Google then scooped their offshoot Android project to develop its own mobile OS, and by the time Apple announced iOS and the original iPhone in 2007, Android, it seems, had been already two years in development. What Google's Android team had concocted at the time in terms of hardware, was something more akin to BlackBerry phones, as you can see in the thumb image, rather than built for a touch-centric new mobile OS like Apple's.

By January 2007, they’d all worked sixty-to-eighty-hour weeks for fifteen months—some for more than two years—writing and testing code, negotiating soft­ware licenses, and flying all over the world to find the right parts, suppliers, and manufacturers. They had been working with proto­types for six months and had planned a launch by the end of the year . . . until Jobs took the stage to unveil the iPhone.

The Sooner project that Google has been working on so far was superior in terms of software flexibility, as it had its own web browser and Google's apps, its own app store API, and was meant to be independent of the hardware platform it will be run on, but the prototype phone itself, had nothing to do with the user-friendly iPhone.

Thus in the aftermath of the Steve Jobs announcement in 2007, Andy Rubin went on record saying "“Holy crap, I guess we’re not going to ship that phone,” referring to the Sooner project, that you can see in the slideshow below. The rest is history, and although Android was born with the launch of the G1, which still had a keyboard, that ship has irreversibly sailed nowadays, and we have Apple to thank or blame for that. “We knew that Apple was going to announce a phone. Everyone knew that. We just didn’t think it would be that good,” comments Ethan Beard, one of Android’s business development execs at the time.

It turns out that Google had a touchscreen phone prototype in the works, too, codenamed Dream, but deemed interacting with it too forward-thinking for the general public just yet, just like Nokia did, and too risky to put resources into. That notion was completely turned on its head by Steve Jobs, and Google fast-tracked the touchy-feely phone a year or so, to launch something that was a mixture of the Sooner and Dream projects, at the same time trying to implement the things Apple didn't do with the first iPhone as an added value in the G1.

source: TheAtlantic

  • Options

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 07:58 11

1. Sire3008 (Posts: 87; Member since: 26 Sep 2013)

New way of saying "we copied" right?

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:24 8

9. ihavenoname (Posts: 1693; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)

Maybe yes, maybe no. But copying or not, good thing that they changed plan. (It became a pretty damn succesfull and damn good eventually.)

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 10:20 2

29. lilhart (Posts: 23; Member since: 22 Jan 2013)

Innovation can be incremental or disruptive. Copying as you name it, might be one way of looking at it. Even Jobs didn't invent computers. Even then he is called one of the greatest innovators and I agree.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 10:43 4

34. sprockkets (Posts: 1611; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)

If we ignore the fact that both the FIC openmoku and Prada beat apple to it, yes.

Apple wants us all to believe they were the only one smart enough to come up with the iphone. They weren't. Bad enough idiots think apple invented the mp3 player.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 11:38 8

44. AppleHateBoy (unregistered)

I have used all the major operating systems. I use Android as my daily driver. All three have their pros and cons. Android is the best for me. But iOS and WP are great too. My brother absolutely loves WP but hates Android.

I don't care who copied whom. The entire world copied China for paper, UK for industries and Nature to build robots. Heck even we learnt to read and write by copying our elders. Copying is all about accepting that someone is better. But that doesn't mean we can't be good or even great. iPhone wasn't the first touchscreen phone. But Apple copied the right stuff from the right people. Add a bit of useful stuff and they succeeded.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 14:01

48. wilsong17 (unregistered)

well who care look were we at 80 worldwide

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:05 2

2. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3718; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)

But anyways a great effort, hard work and invention too.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:12 9

3. Zylam (Posts: 1123; Member since: 20 Oct 2010)

Ahhhh Android copied iOS? Daniel P, the Android breathing preteens here will wet the bed and not be able to sleep for 10 years now, as their religious beliefs have been ruined.

So Android first tried to copy BB, than copied iOS. LMAO.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:17 12

5. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)

Android fans don't need to get mad at this, everyone need to know that if there's no iPhone, there will be no smartphone. Just be happy with the OS you're using, folks!

P.s. I'm not helping Apple.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:17 6

6. ajac09 (Posts: 1482; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)

See thats the issue with iphone users they think everyone should drop their own wants to go with what they want and nothing else.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:26 3

10. illusionmist (Posts: 157; Member since: 29 Jan 2013)

Usually I see more Android fanboys calling iPhone users "sheeep," saying that they "buy those toys just for the logo" than iPhone's laughing at people using Android, though.

Anyway just bear in mind all those idiots (on either side) represent only a small fraction of the users, and you'll instantly feel better.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:52 1

18. nexusdude (Posts: 151; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)

Yeah, because iPhone fans don't know what Android is... for real.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 15:09

49. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)

You will see them in a ratio of 4:1 when market is dominated by Android in same ratio. Nothing unusual.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:28 2

11. ihavenoname (Posts: 1693; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)

Thats also problem with Android and WP fans, don't blame iPhone users. Really.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:45 2

16. WindowsiDroid (Posts: 138; Member since: 22 Jul 2013)

"everyone need to know that if there's no iPhone, there will be no smartphone." I guess you've forget the Nokia Symbian OS which is the first smartphone OS.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:58 6

20. EnigmaticPsychotic (Posts: 67; Member since: 26 Nov 2013)

Which wasn't very good by the way.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 09:01

21. jellmoo (Posts: 2036; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)

Yeaaaaaaah, take a step back and re-think that statement dude.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 09:03 2

22. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)

Actually, the first smartphone was the IBM Simon.

And yes, Nokia Symbian OS was the first smartphone OS. But, when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone, phones have started to have touchscreen and they became the standard.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 10:14

27. elitewolverine (Posts: 5192; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)

"no iPhone, there will be no smartphone" no...

What they did was make smartphone OS dumb enough for the masses. At the time the iphone was around, Smartphone OS were for the geeks.

The concepts that people have today of flexibility, rom loading, etc etc were all foreign concepts to the masses uses 'normal phones'.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 12:03

46. AppleHateBoy (unregistered)

Nokia and Microsoft foolishly copied the desktop to build a touchscreen UI. Apple did the right thing in building a new UI. Google just expanded onto their idea. But that doesn't mean Google did anything wrong.

posted on 23 Dec 2013, 16:53

56. lyndon420 (Posts: 5003; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)

I wouldn't consider the iPhone to be a smartphone, but I see the point you are trying to make here. A smartphone was due to come out around the time the iPhone did...if apple didn't do it when they did, someone would have come along shortly after. Tablets, smartphones/tricorders etc where already conceived in science fiction movies from years earlier, it just took an OEM to eventually take the concept and bring it to life. When the iPhone came out I thought it was great, but I didn't jump on it right away because I knew something better was coming along....so glad I waited :)

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 10:15 2

28. sprockkets (Posts: 1611; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)

Sure, if we ignore the fact that there was a capcitive touchscreen before the iphone called the prada and a multi touch one called the FIC openmoko...

Sure, we all copied the iphone!

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 10:39 3

33. 14545 (Posts: 1676; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)

Apparently you can't read. Where does it say anything about android copying iOS? It specifically says they felt they needed to start over based on what Apple brought to the table.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 11:59 2

45. tedkord (Posts: 14134; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)

Daniel P. is just regurgitating a story from another site. There is a more recent story here now from an Android engineer which confirms a story from years ago that Android had two major prototypes in parallel development, the Sooner and the Dream. One was Blackberryish, the other was full touchscreen capable. They simply dropped the Sooner and went with the eventual G1, but it was being worked on in the beginning of 2006, a year before the iPhone.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:16 5

4. alterecho (Posts: 1099; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)

I'll bookmark this page for later use.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 10:35 2

31. sprockkets (Posts: 1611; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)

Better bookmark this one too showing that the above wasn't the only prototype.


posted on 20 Dec 2013, 11:34

43. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)

Yup. But for some reason that 2nd pic is always not found or overlooked in the fanboy battles.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:19 1

7. Trunks101880 (Posts: 4; Member since: 21 May 2012)

So sooner and dream....they combined both prototypes and came up with the G1. I would not say they copied...I would say Apple forced there hand for the better. All in all....instead of saying one is better then the other...cant we enjoy the fact we have kickass phones across the board?

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:23

8. Slammer (Posts: 1515; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)

The industry should've been on this earlier. Taking an ipod touch and adding phone capabilities, was too simple yet a huge move forward. Sometimes the simplest things that dont seem relevant, can be the best ideas. All you have many times, is a gut feeling. Go for it.

No doubt the first iphone was revolutionary.

John B.

posted on 20 Dec 2013, 08:32 1

14. illusionmist (Posts: 157; Member since: 29 Jan 2013)

You got it mixed up... iPod touch is iPhone minus phone capabilities. It came later than the iPhone.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories