Class Action suit says Apple forced iPhone users to upgrade to iOS 7 to save it money
by Alan Friedman / Feb 03, 2017, 2:13 AM
Some background information is needed, and we're happy to oblige. When FaceTime launched back in 2010, Apple had two methods that allowed iPhone users to deliver video and audio content to each other. One was a peer-to-peer system that connected the iPhone units directly. The second method used third party relay service from Akamai to transmit data from one iPhone to another.
Apple soon had to do away with peer-to-peer connections for FaceTime thanks to the first verdict in the VirnetX infringement suit, which was won by the latter. Apple was directed to pay $368 million to VirnetX (an amount that was eventually lowered in subsequent trials). The worse part of the verdict was that it forced Apple to stop using peer-to-peer for FaceTime. And the relay system, which originally was used on only 5% to 10% of FaceTime calls, soon was employed on a much larger percentage of FaceTime calls. Apple had to pay Akamai $50 million from April through September 2013 to relay audio and video from one iPhone to another.
But Apple was able to create a way to use peer-to-peer on FaceTime in iOS 7 that didn't touch VirnetX's patents. To save huge gobs of cash, Apple needed a way to get holdover iOS 6 users to update to iOS 7 so that they could use the new peer-to-peer technology on FaceTime. The more iPhone users who remained on iOS 6, the more money Apple would have to continue paying Akamai for the relay system. According to the Class Action suit filed on Thursday, Apple was able to get users to migrate to iOS 7 by breaking FaceTime on the older iOS builds.
Starting on April 16, 2014, Apple started the FaceTime break, blaming it on a bug from an expiring device certificate. Apple's support page at the time even repeated that story. Apple said on the support page that both the user and the friend he/she was trying to FaceTime with would no longer experience any issues if they updated to the newest build of iOS, which was iOS 7.0.4 at the time. This was Apple's way to get out from under the monthly payments it was making to Akamai. Remember, iOS 7 and higher employed the new peer-to-peer system for FaceTime that did not infringe on VirnetX's patents.
The Class Action suit charges Apple with forcing owners of the Apple iPhone 4 and Apple iPhone 4s to update to iOS 7.0.4, a build that the older models could not run smoothly. Many of these older units crashed while trying to run the new software. As a result, the suit claims that Apple violated California's unfair competition clause and intentionally interfered with the possessions of others (a tort called trespass to chattels). The suit seeks an undisclosed amount of money.
Check out the official filing of the suit, which demands a jury trial, directly below.
source: Scribd via AppleInsider
Posts: 501; Member since: May 11, 2013
typical apple style LOL
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 2:48 AM 8
I agree..ios 6 was the only os wich was more refined than android. After ios6 all versions were full of bugs, stutters. Worse than Android.
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 2:54 AM 11
Posts: 1813; Member since: Oct 20, 2010
Yup, I left iOS after 6, couldn't take the horrible design language of the redesign, as well as all the bugs and such. IOS 6 was a work of art. IOS 9 recovered and started to being back the glory days, but then the horrid iOS 10 showed up. I seriously hate iOS10.
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 3:01 AM 5
Posts: 3960; Member since: Oct 21, 2014
Wow, for once I completely agree with you. I too kept my last iPhone (a jailbroken 4s) on iOS 6 through out its remaining use, even sold it just last year on iOS 6.1.2. Couldn't stand the cartoonish UI of iOS starting with iOS 7, it literally merged the worst of Windows Phone with iOS; a lazy-fugly-flat UI. With no official theming engine, 0 improvements for the 4s that wasn't already possible with jailbreak, and knowing apple's planned obsolescence, I just never bothered upgrading past iOS 6.
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 8:41 AM 0
Posts: 953; Member since: Dec 18, 2013
I miss iOS 6 on my iPhone 5, this version is the most beautiful UI and old school I ever used. ;( If iOS 7 till iOS 10 only can choose one version, I would choose 9.3.5 because this version is more stable.
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 3:53 AM 2
Posts: 21785; Member since: May 28, 2014
Once again: Karma--her pimp hand--baby powder--Apple's face. And NO, me saying this doesn't mean I'm "ignorant" of how well Apple is doing, like some people would have you believe. The people that believe that are the ignorant ones. All it means is that Apple is now reaping what it has sewn. Apple should definitely be held fully accountable for its actions if they did this.
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 2:55 AM 3
Someone give the guy a biscuit for participation.
posted on Feb 05, 2017, 4:54 PM 0
Posts: 80; Member since: Nov 01, 2013
Apple fans don't care about this, they just want their stupid apples on the back on their phones. Being forced to upgrade by breaking one of the things that every apple user talks about...their stupid facetime (video call in the real world). How many iphone users had to get a new Iphone because of the update? How many people complaint they couldn't use their iphones because the update make their phones so slow that they had to upgrade? It's ridiculous but hey, you get what you love isheeps
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 6:26 AM 3
Posts: 14967; Member since: Sep 25, 2013
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Apple no longer has the cloak of protection of the US Gov't. It is now open season on Apple. YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gun them down with so many lawsuits. We already know Apple breaks stuff on purpose and then lies and fixes it later. Example, when Steve Jobs was in the house, Steve forced his engineering team to remove heat sinks from the Mac at the time. I believe it was the G3 or G4. BEcause the Mac has no active cooling, the CPU would get so hot, it would melt the capacitors next to it. One guy sued Apple saying it wasn't his fault, but it was a bad design. Apple was charging for this repair, but after the suit had to refund everyone who paid and fix it all for free. The same as they did with the iPhone 4. Steve Jobs admitted they saw a problem with the antenna, but he said y felt it was no big deal. But as a backup Apple made a "case" sort of, that happen to cover the sides and they tried to sell it as an accessory. But after the complainants came in, to prevent being sued, they gave the accessory away for free, They also knew the iPhone had a structural flaw. They released it anyways. Then refuse to replace the phones when people brought them back. Now the issue adds and is part of the cause of touch disease which Apple is being sued for. Then Apple purposely bricked phones that were repaired by a 3rd party, which is also illegal. Voiding a warranty is not. If I take my car to another place and is worked on, if they break it, then I have to deal with them on a legal level, but my car manufacturer can't cripple my car for doing so. These are things Apple has done that are illegal and morally wrong, yet the fans here suck Apple like a nipple on a bottle or poop. The are overall a good company, buns overlooking their blatant misdeed, but so quick to call out other company's makes you all hypocrites and trolls and you have nerve to ever call anyone else out. I hope every tech company on this planet sues them out of business and the tech world won't miss them. I cant think of any company that's like Apple. They just like their money.
posted on Feb 03, 2017, 11:16 AM 3
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):