Apple seeks to patent a device display with an integrated fingerprint scanner inside

Apple seeks to patent a device display with an integrated fingerprint scanner inside
According to a recent patent application that Apple filed in with the USPTO, Cupertino might be working on a device display that is able to register your fingerprint and act similarly to the existing TouchID-enabled home button of the company's more recent devices, such as the iPhone 6/6 Plus, the iPhone 5s, the iPad Air 2, and the iPad Mini 3. Although the patent images accompanying the patent show us an iPad, it's plausible that if Apple's indeed developing such a tech it will inevitably land on some future rendition of Apple's most successful line of products - the iPhone family.

As per the patent description, this fingerprint-scanning display is able to register up to four separate prints simultaneously. This is courtesy of a thin fingerprint-sensing layer, rich in sensors, positioned either below or over the display of the device. In the end, Apple claims that its tech could evolve into a "a full panel fingerprint sensor".

It seems that the user will be able to "simply press a finger onto an icon placed on the display for scanning related to a user's ID". This hints us at some new plausible functionalities - for example, users might be given the ability to launch a certain app with their fingerprints only, thus preventing others from opening it. But of course, we're just speculating here. 

We should not rule out the possibility that Cupertino is just making sure that it will have the upper hand if someone else comes up with a similar idea. 

source: USPTO via PatentlyApple 



1. kent-gaga

Posts: 609; Member since: Apr 10, 2012

did Apple actually make it happened or they just patented it and wait and sue the crap out of others who can latter make it real?

10. AwesomestMaximuss

Posts: 148; Member since: Jul 09, 2013

Samsung was gonna do it with s5 but dint due to high cost...

20. engineer-1701d unregistered

i remember that samsung was working on this and has patents

16. vincelongman

Posts: 5654; Member since: Feb 10, 2013

Well to make this Apple would need to make displays as well But they don't make displays They buy them from Samsung, LG, Sharp, Japan Display,... So this is probably more to stop the other companies from implementing before them But the other companies can still integrate displays and fingerprint readers They cant use the same methods as noted in Apple's patent Problem is I dont think Samsung, LG, Sharp, Japan Display have much knowledge with fingerprint readers On another note, Synaptics integrated fingerprint readers in their new "precision touchpad" Synaptics said they would be ready for phones soon

28. tedkord

Posts: 17198; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

They heard about Samsung working on it, and immediately filed a patent worded as nebulously as patent.

2. boosook

Posts: 1442; Member since: Nov 19, 2012

Why not patent the Time Machine as well? I thought you could patent only things that actually work, not ideas that *might* work in the future IF someone invents the technology needed to actually build them...

22. talon95

Posts: 990; Member since: Jul 31, 2012

No kidding. Apple doesn't design/manufacture squat when it comes to hardware so they shouldn't get to patent stuff just because they saw our posts over the last 3 years and want to lock everyone else out. Let a real company who actually invents technology, and doesn't just conceive of it, produce such and thing and sell it to all the phone manufacturers. For all the praise Apple gets for nicely encapsulating a bunch of technology in a sweet package, they sure stifle a lot of innovation by locking down anything remotely similar, but potentially much better, and then leave their own product stagnant for years as long as the money is still rolling in. Motorola and Nokia should just take back all their "FRAND" essential mobile technology so that no one else can make a phone and laugh all the way to the bank like Apple does. If you're a third part and willing to license the tech to anyone then I'm fine with it, but when you lock the tech away in one corner of the market and prevent it from being developed, that's pathetic. I'm not a doctor but I patent breathing, regardless of how much I know about anatomy or how many people have done it before me, and I choose to license it to everyone on earth except Tim Cook. Tough luck buddy.../s

23. kryme

Posts: 468; Member since: Oct 24, 2013

Did google buy all patents from moto? So they will have a hand in the FRAND...???

4. Ashoaib

Posts: 3271; Member since: Nov 15, 2013

There are apps which turn the screen into a so called finger print scanner. Even a palm scaner. This concept is already present, I dont think patent will be granted on a common concept. What apple is going to do is just inplementing the concept

15. magnanimus

Posts: 565; Member since: Mar 29, 2013

Sorry to break it to you, those apps aren't real. They don't actually work. The technology to do this hasn't been revealed yet

19. Ashoaib

Posts: 3271; Member since: Nov 15, 2013

Its ok, No need to sorry, I know those apps are not real. Thats why I used the term "so called finger scaner". But my point is about the concept and idea, which is already in the market

29. tedkord

Posts: 17198; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

There was news about Samsung working on this almost 2 years ago. Someone else actually inventing something has never speed Apple from trying to patent other's work, and its never stopped the USPTO from granting it.

5. LuckyS

Posts: 154; Member since: Dec 07, 2013

One day Apple will patent apple.

7. Kruze

Posts: 1285; Member since: Dec 30, 2014

Apple might patent Tim Cook as well.

13. dimas

Posts: 3324; Member since: Jul 22, 2014

Apple: Thomas Edison of modern era.

9. JC557

Posts: 1918; Member since: Dec 07, 2011

They did trademark Apple or something like it. NYC came under fire from Apple quite some time ago about it. So did a pastry shop/ cafe in Europe (sweden?). So they did try...

14. RebelwithoutaClue unregistered

You mean Apfelkind, a German cafe that was sued over their logo?

18. LuckyS

Posts: 154; Member since: Dec 07, 2013

I didn't know. This is ridiculous and has to be stopped. No one should be allowed to patent any natural shape, plant, animal, geometric figure, or technology which is created by merging two or more existing technologies.

27. iampayne

Posts: 322; Member since: Aug 12, 2013

"one should be allowed to patent any natural shape, plant, animal, geometric figure, or technology" Uumm do you mean "patent" or did you mean to say "trademark"? There is a huge difference. And from that list you're basically saying every sports team on the globe shouldn't be allowed to trademark their logo? Because their logos include natural shapes, animals, etc. If thats what you mean I won't argue with you just trying to clarify.

32. VZWuser76

Posts: 4974; Member since: Mar 04, 2010

It depends though. If you look at the case in Germany that Rebel linked to, that looks nothing like the Apple logo, the only similarities is that both have an apple in their logo. The same thing happened in NYC. They have been known as "The Big Apple" for longer than Apple has been in business. A few years ago they had a logo for tourism that had an apple in it. It didn't have a bite out of it, just an apple that looked nothing like any of the logos Apple has used, and Apple wanted them to change it as well. That's essentially trademarking the image of an apple, which cannot be done. The NYC logo can be seen in the article I linked below. Anyone who thinks Apple was justified in that case or the German one needs to be hit in the head repeatedly with a tack hammer if they think Apple was in the right there. Now Apple can trademark their logo of the apple with a bite out of it, or the rainbow apple that they started out with, but Apple can't call foul when others use an apple that isn't one of those designs. Trademarking refers to specific designs, not designs in general. So as far as sports teams logos, or any logos for that matter, trade-marking only refers to that specific design, not the subject of the logo in general. You can have a logo of a viking, but you can't use the specific logo of the Minnesota Vikings, with a head shown in profile in that style of art and using those colors. That's the difference.

6. frydaexiii

Posts: 1476; Member since: Dec 01, 2011

Oh for effs sake...Really? At least iPA has the right idea with the last line there now.

8. vurobega

Posts: 45; Member since: Nov 16, 2014

I think what they patented is the technology behind the screen scanner isn't it??? or does people can patented some great idea?!? if they can, it must be team on star trek that will be so rich cause they has make so much device that become real this day...

30. tedkord

Posts: 17198; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

Come on, now. This is Apple were talking about. They find out about the work of others, and try to patent it. In this case, the heard about Samsung working on exactly this, and they filed a patent on the CONCEPT, no actually tech. Here's the abstract from the patent : "A fingerprint sensor is incorporated in a display stack in an electronic device. A single fingerprint can be captured at one time at a single pre-defined fixed location on a display. Alternatively, a single fingerprint can be acquired at one time at any location on a display. Alternatively, multiple touches on the display can be acquired substantially simultaneously where only one fingerprint is captured at a time or where all of the fingerprints are acquired at the same time. The fingerprint sensor can be implemented as an integrated circuit connected to a bottom surface of a cover sheet, near the bottom surface of the cover sheet, or connected to a top surface of a display. Alternatively, the fingerprint sensor can be implemented as a full panel fingerprint sensor." Notice it's a nebulous, wide open description designed to cover any implementation of fingerprint scanning embedded in a display. This is a despicable company.

11. Danini1112

Posts: 70; Member since: Jun 22, 2013

"We should not rule out the possibility that Cupertino is just making sure that it will have the upper hand if someone else comes with a similar idea." Samsung already has a patent like that. Why you not even mention it...

12. itsdeepak4u2000

Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012

Yeah, I can patent the bridge from earth to moon.

17. danielxxi

Posts: 183; Member since: Feb 13, 2013

Sony was patented this 3 years ago, you can googled it

21. nctx77

Posts: 2540; Member since: Sep 03, 2013

iPhone 7 baby!!

24. rockers123

Posts: 137; Member since: Sep 08, 2013

Samsung already has a patent on it. PA pls mention that

25. rockers123

Posts: 137; Member since: Sep 08, 2013

26. iampayne

Posts: 322; Member since: Aug 12, 2013

You fanboys are really funny. Did you even read the article before you decided to sound so cool. The word patent doesn't even show up in the article. The article is pure rumor. Unless of course your GS5 has a bezel-less frame, oh wait no it doesn't, or maybe no home button like the article states, wait it has one of those. But surely you can use it while wearing gloves.... A rumor is not a patent just fyi.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.