switch from LCD to OLED, as has been reported umpteen times over the past few months alone. But according to Wang — CEO of panel maker Innolux — OLED is not a viable long-term solution for Apple. While the fruit company may utilize OLED to shake things up — 2017 models could even include curved-edge panels à la Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 — it supposedly cannot unseat LCD in for performance-to-cost ratio nor reliability says Wang. Moreover, global supply of smartphone-ready OLED displays is said to be running low, which would be problematic for Apple in the long run.It is strongly suspected that the 2017 iPhone will see Apple
Enter MicroLED, a work-in-progress that Apple has had a vested interest in for a few years now. Back in 2014, it acquired Silicon Valley-based LuxVue Technology, a start-up recognized as a pioneer of MicroLED. Late last year, it was suggested that Apple had begun a secretive project in Taiwan focused on MicroLED's development, while next year's Apple Watch could be among the first recipients.
MicroLED is said to offer many potential benefits over current display tech, though there are also a few cons. Notably, MicroLED is more power-efficient than its peers. It also takes some of the advantages of OLED — pure blacks, quick refresh rates — and aligns them with perks of LCD, like better brightness. MicroLED is pricier and more difficult to produce in the kinds of quantities Apple will require. But the supposed performance rewards explain why Apple has gone to the trouble of acquiring LuxVue, whilst keeping its Taiwan-based R&D plant under wraps.
Essentially, Apple needs to get to a stage where it can churn out a lot of MicroLED panels at a cost that makes economic sense. Should such efforts materialize, it's quite possible that the company's proposed move to OLED next year will be a short-lived love affair.