Alleged Note 7 vs S7 edge vs S7 pics compare screens, benchmarks


Gather around, people, here we have what may be the first pics of the upcoming Galaxy Note 7 in operational mode next to its smaller Galaxy S7 and S7 edge siblings in a few varying editions - Korea, Japan and Hong Kong. Not only that, but the two pics below compare benchmark results, as well as give us somewhat of a hint about the display merits of Samsung's next blockbuster phablet.

As you can see, the Note 7 (on the far right), scores commendably on AnTuTu and Geekbench, besting both the S7 sand S7 edge on the multi-core front, which leads us to the thought that there really might be an enhanced Exynos 8893 or Snapdragon 821 inside, with higher clock frequencies than the chippery in the S7. The AnTuTu score is roughly similar on all, but that benchmark measures a lot more things than mere processing speeds, like memory read/write speeds, which evens out the tally.

On the display front, the things are not as clear as with the cold hard benchmark numbers - on one of the pics the Note 7 screen looks much brighter than the others, while on the other the autodimming has apparently kicked in. The Note 7's screen is so glaring on the Geekbench results display, in fact, that it seems almost burned in terms of camera exposure, or maybe there is some tinkering involved. In any case, take these with a grain of salt for now, yet what we are looking at might be good approximations at how the 6th edition of Samsung's Note line will perform relative to the S7 and S7 edge.


source: Weibo via TheAndroidSoul

Related phones

Galaxy Note 7
  • Display 5.7" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core, 2150 MHz
  • Storage 64 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3500 mAh
Galaxy S7 edge
  • Display 5.5" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core, 2200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3600 mAh(36h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

42 Comments

1. dubaiboy78

Posts: 442; Member since: Sep 19, 2014

which is which

9. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

1st, 5th, 2nd, 4th, and 3rd are samsung phones.. thats all I know

33. Epicness1o1

Posts: 303; Member since: May 30, 2013

HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA

2. fyah_king unregistered

Looks like it's just the regular exynos version. The same score as the s7 edge international one. There's no enhanced exynos 8893 here and definitely not sd 821 because the score is too high in multicore.

5. BradyCrack

Posts: 835; Member since: Dec 29, 2015

I wonder how this device will go against the iPhone 7 in real life performance tests. The S7 got beaten by the 6s, so I wonder how good the 8893 and 821 are compared.

31. CreeDiddy

Posts: 2146; Member since: Nov 04, 2011

The A10 should give the iPhone 7 3200/5600. Somewhere around there.

6. keithtae

Posts: 564; Member since: Mar 25, 2015

Furthest right in Black is the note 7, DUH.

35. DarkVader777

Posts: 52; Member since: Feb 10, 2016

lol and I dont have my glasses on.

7. fonelover

Posts: 255; Member since: Mar 19, 2015

Single core performance is still sloppy.

11. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

single core performance is useless anyway

14. AmashAziz

Posts: 2898; Member since: Jun 30, 2014

I wish I could correct you!

21. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

They're both great performers, there isn't much in it. It's just a shame Qualcomm and Samsung couldn't make Snapdragon 820 more efficient.

23. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

They're both important, it's about getting the balance right.

36. DarkVader777

Posts: 52; Member since: Feb 10, 2016

I still think Touch wiz plays a part in the results. IMO. so calm down everybody

8. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

Not that great. Results from OnePlus 3 Single-Core: 2369 Multi-Core: 5609

10. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

that image show multi-core:6217

15. AmashAziz

Posts: 2898; Member since: Jun 30, 2014

6217 is from the exynos one, not the snapdragon as its a quad core chip.

17. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

Indeed 5600 vs 6100 isn't a lot. What that? an 8% difference?

22. Amroze

Posts: 597; Member since: Jul 04, 2016

If Samsung wanted to make it 28% different, they would, but it will effect sales for USA. Snapdragon could no way.

24. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

That's hilarious, so it's a conspiracy!! Where do you looneys come from?

27. Amroze

Posts: 597; Member since: Jul 04, 2016

Dumbass Exynos was always better than Snapdragon. Don't you research?

32. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

Not always, Exynos 5410(Galaxy S4) and Exynos 5422(Galaxy S5) were not that great. They were pretty even back with the Galaxy S III, with both having their own advantages. Please return to your looney asylum.

39. Amroze

Posts: 597; Member since: Jul 04, 2016

They were, they kicked the Snapdragon. These were A15 . Samsung always leading. While Snapdragon were on A9.

29. YOURDADkid unregistered

You terrorist ! I am deleting my account as I can't be on Website OR write something on website where there are terrorists and their supporters!! God bless you and Stop terrorism and save Humanity

37. DarkVader777

Posts: 52; Member since: Feb 10, 2016

MY man, I like your toughness. Dont delete your account.

41. AmashAziz

Posts: 2898; Member since: Jun 30, 2014

Why do you pop up everywhere 'You-whatever-a-kid'? And if you think I will get blown by a Rocket just becoz you call me a terrorist (for no reason), then you are wrong kid! And please stay away from me. I am tired of laughing on your childish attitude!

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.