Samsung Galaxy S III is dimmer than prior models, says test
The three generations of Samsung Galaxy S devices
After a number of tests, which you can view at the source link, the Samsung Galaxy S III and Samsung Galaxy S II received grades of B+ while the Samsung Galaxy S was graded a B.
source: DisplayMate via PCMag
1. Ohrules (Posts: 298; Member since: 11 Jun 2012)
i doubt that you would notice that in everyday usage
9. StrumerJohn (Posts: 66; Member since: 18 May 2011)
It's not as bright as my 3VO, but I don't mind. The clarity and quality of the display make up for it not being as bright. I LOVE my SGSIII so far! :D I just wish I didn't have a locked bootloader... :'(
22. sspediacci (Posts: 1; Member since: 08 Feb 2008)
I notice it all the time. I use it outside a lot and have to shade it or find shade to make it useable at times. I still love the phone, but the display brightness is horrible for outside day usage.
2. Atrixboyyy (Posts: 221; Member since: 03 Nov 2011)
Geez even when comparing 3 "Galaxy S" models you still throw in some apple info.
7. PapaSmurf (Posts: 5775; Member since: 14 May 2012)
I was thinking the same exact thing honestly. Why must Apple be mentioned in almost EVERY article? They're nothing special....
Sorry, I accidentally thumbed you down.
10. Atrixboyyy (Posts: 221; Member since: 03 Nov 2011)
Doing all my comments and views from my phone I've thumbd down a few ppl by accident...
3. wendygarett (unregistered)
For the last time sgs2 is way better than sgs3...
Only those fanboy keep claiming this is the best
5. Sniggly (Posts: 6400; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
No, the SGS3 is definitely better. Newer hardware, newer software, better battery life... Yeah. Better.
6. Atrixboyyy (Posts: 221; Member since: 03 Nov 2011)
I didn't even know how to reply to his statement .. thanks for putting my thoughts into words.
13. gallitoking (Posts: 4623; Member since: 17 May 2011)
"the SGS3 is definitely better. Newer hardware, newer software, better battery life... Yeah. Better." the only thing better was battery life.. other than that everything else is newer,.. which doesn't translate into better.. right?
17. Sniggly (Posts: 6400; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
You're playing semantics. Yes, in this case, newer translates into better. The S4 is a more powerful chip whose advantages aren't clearly spelled out by its raw clock speed. The phone overall is a generation newer in design; meaning that many small tweaks were probably done to fix past mistakes. Also, since it was built with ICS in mind, its hardware takes better advantage of the software loaded onto it.
You came here to argue with me. You get no sympathy.
14. wendygarett (unregistered)
Have you consider the price??
16. Sniggly (Posts: 6400; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
Of course I have. The extra hundo is not a bad difference to pay for the boosts the S3 has to offer for a geek like me.
Granted, for some people it might not be so worth it, which is why those other phones are still around. But still, not a bad price.
8. PapaSmurf (Posts: 5775; Member since: 14 May 2012)
That's like saying he iPhone 4 is better than the 4S. I seriously don't know where you got this thought from, but it's been proven that the GS3 is better than the previous version at pretty much everything.
11. ObjectivismFTW (Posts: 211; Member since: 03 Jul 2012)
That statement is stupid on so many different levels .....
12. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 2839; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)
The only thing better is that the SGS2 isn't pentile but its completely overkilled by screen size and resolution. Much faster processor, double the RAM, screen size and ppi, better camera and video recording with no stutter lag. The SGS2 is still better than a lot of new phones but its overshadowed by the S3
20. wsucoug13 (Posts: 164; Member since: 04 May 2012)
I have a verizon SGSIII and people really need to stop bringing up the pentile thing and how it is a negative. Literally cannot tell AT ALL... screen resolution is too high. The phone is incredible in every way possible
21. wsucoug13 (Posts: 164; Member since: 04 May 2012)
haha.... think before you speak please. good god.
15. Sackboy117 (Posts: 178; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Logic: As long as *Brightness of Phone* < *Brightness of Sun,* no one is happy. :)
18. a_tumiwa (Posts: 142; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)
who are so blind to use the highest brightness setting?
19. aoikemono27 (Posts: 177; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
The galaxy s iii at my local at&t store was pretty dim. It wasn't even in direct sunlight, but sitting in the back wall. I thought hmmm, maybe it's that dreaded auto-dim Samsung uses. NOPE. The auto was turned off and brightness set to max. AMOLEDs do not look good at low brightness, and it looks even worse when dimmed on auto. LCDs can go dim without it effecting quality much, but AMOLEDs are completely different. The HTC One X phones hanging in the front near the door in direct sunlight looked good even with all the light. I'm still waiting for AMOLEDs to wow me. Been using Samsung phones since The first Super AMOLED panel on the Samsung Wave.