x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • DROID DNA vs Galaxy Note II poll results: Yes, the DNA can do it!

DROID DNA vs Galaxy Note II poll results: Yes, the DNA can do it!

Posted: , by Ray S.

Tags :

DROID DNA vs Galaxy Note II poll results: Yes, the DNA can do it!
OK, guys, we've given you enough time to cast your votes in favor of the HTC DROID DNA, or the Samsung Galaxy Note II. It's now time to see what the results are and start analyzing them!

So, it's relatively safe to say that you are actually in love with the DROID DNA by HTC, as you've stated it loudly and clearly that it has the potential to overcome the Galaxy Note II by Samsung in this increasingly bloody warfare. However, the margin between the two isn't that big, so this win doesn't mean HTC can relax. Nope, the Taiwanese manufacturer absolutely needs to keep those cutting-edge devices coming! The DROID DNA has managed to beat the Galaxy Note II in our poll with 53.87% of all votes, but the Note II still has quite a bit of following with 46.13%.

The DROID DNA seems to be the superior device in most categories, except for storage space, where it's basically stuck at 16GB, with no option to expand this. Meanwhile, the Note II comes in different internal memory variants and features a microSD card slot. Still, having vast amounts of storage space isn't a must for everyone, so we wouldn't consider this a deal-breaker for the DNA, especially when it comes with that beautiful $199 price tag, instead of the $299 that carriers are asking for the Note II. The only thing we can hope for now is a wider availability for the DROID DNA, which is currently exclusive to Verizon Wireless.

Phonearena polls
sort by
Can the HTC DROID DNA deal with the Galaxy Note II?
953 votes
(953 votes) Yes, the DROID DNA can do it!
816 votes
(816 votes) No, the Galaxy Note II is the ultimate phablet.

1769 votes

  • Options

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 07:49 27

1. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)

fans just like DNA coz of display

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 07:51 22

3. android_hitman (unregistered)

u have a point here :) but the note has other advantages so basically everyone buys what he prefers...

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:17 19

11. hung2900 (Posts: 956; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)

I know that almost viewers on PhoneArena are just viewers, not buyers.
Today they say the phone ABC is great, some days later they say another phone XYZ is better,...
When 808 was coming out, there were a mass of "41MP or GTFO" "808 PureView or GTFO" comments, but in fact very few did buy or really wanna buy it. The same thing happened with Lumia 920, Optimus G and now is the Droid DNA.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:33 1

16. wp8forever (unregistered)

like the lumia 920 lol pls thats wwhy is sold out everywhere u are and idiot , thats the best phone in the world right now .

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:48 11

20. hung2900 (Posts: 956; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)

Have you bought it? Has any of your friends bought it?
If you did, can you show me a photo? lolz =))

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 11:54 4

43. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

I bought it. For cool 599 too. Gotta keep that unlimited. I probably will buy another one shortly, for my better half.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:04 1

44. FAW-Q (Posts: 63; Member since: 29 Jul 2011)

You sound like a Fan-droid in iSh33p clothing.

posted on 18 Nov 2012, 11:32 1

86. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)

go play with your brick ... lol

posted on 19 Nov 2012, 02:22 1

91. picka_vi_materina (Posts: 174; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)

If I have only ten in stock, of course I can have them sold out.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:23 1

47. crankyd00d (Posts: 191; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

True lol, most end up buying a cheap Huaweii POS haha

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:37 2

51. andro. (Posts: 1998; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)

I agree totally with you. A lot of comment makers here no little of the day to day reality of the phone basis and actual industry running. I was criticised for saying pure view wasn't really wanted and wouldn't sell and also that windows phones were very unpopular and carriers had backlogs of unsold stock. A lot of viewers claimed otherwise but figures ultimately showed the reality. The DNA I think will be a good seller but not top seller. The note 2 will see more,however it is a great device right now and a good foresight into what tech level 2013 HTC flagships could be like

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 22:47

73. shandesilva (Posts: 79; Member since: 28 Mar 2012)

yeah...guys who have enough money to spend dont waste time reading all the websites. they just go & buy it :)..its us..the less well off ppl who just read & make comments.
btw...a rarely seen "fair" review by Ray S. congratulations to you on pulling that off. :)

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 11:09 4

40. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1236; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)

seems to me most people in this poll are the type that carrya smartphone for flashing it than actually using it. the only reason these people must have voted for Droid DNA is if they wanted to flaunt that 1080p screen!

People realise the truth 1080p 15 inch laptop displays look stunning and many laptops carry a 1366x768 res which the users are fine with but NO if it comes to phones we want a gazillion pixels per inch....seriously??!!!

The nOte 2 has a 720p display which is more than enough for anything around 5 inches...yes 1080p is better only in terms of ppi and not actual user experience! The hardware and software together comprise of the user experience and the Note 2 is the undoubted champion in that...it has more softwar optimizations than the S3 which had some 40 or so software optimizations built in giving a wonderful experience to the user.

Even HTC claim its not a phablet its a super-display smartphone...period! The Droid DNA is a great smartphone but thats about it...it doesn't provide anything that other flagships dont. The winning factor of the Note 2 lies in its uniqueness of use

posted on 17 Nov 2012, 15:52 1

79. chris2k5 (Posts: 43; Member since: 17 Nov 2012)

LOL Another person who talks like they own both phones. If you haven't used both then you don't know s**t. GTFO.

posted on 17 Nov 2012, 15:42 1

78. danny_a2005 (Posts: 165; Member since: 06 Oct 2011)

when people (samsung s3) owners see my one x they always say my phone is sexy and pretty.. everyone has an iPhone or and s3.. I feel my phone is exclusive

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:00 21

6. Cynipap999 (banned) (Posts: 138; Member since: 15 Nov 2012)

Absolutely, display and sexy design. Does this Poll have a margin of error and, more importantly, has Florida been taken into account?

For me not having expandable memory (microSD slot) and a sealed low capacity battery are an absolutely no-deal! For those who don't mind fixed memory and a dead phone when they can't get to a power source, knock yourselves out! Remember, a gorgeous HD display will do you no good when your phone's battery is DEAD!!

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 11:33 2

41. Twashbush (Posts: 47; Member since: 08 Jun 2011)

Totally agree with you on your points of non expandable memory and limited battery.

Thats why of the current Verizon options, I would still get the Razr Maxx HD.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:06 2

46. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

You talk from your own experience about it being dead all the time?? No? Then shut up. I hear some lucky folks with phone IN THEIR HANDS say it's the best and battery life is decent.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:32 2

48. crankyd00d (Posts: 191; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

You tell him to shut up but then you say "I hear", aka you don't know s**t either, which makes you more ignorant than him. He has the same right to post here than you do, and based on how useless yours was I'd say he should actually have more rights than you

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:54 1

53. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

OK, here go my rights....

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:04 5

8. psysect (Posts: 49; Member since: 27 Sep 2012)

yeeeees...fans like dna coz its soooooooooo much beautifull , better build quality, better size , better performance , better camera, better screen , better ui & ...

i dont attract to note only for s pen or better battary..ok big battery is very nice but dna battries is just enoghe for a day.. beside this u can use of the best screen , perfomance & powerfull sound that i dont change it with note 2 although note 2 also is a fantastic phone.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 11:49 1

42. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

No, I like it because it's HTC, because it looks awesome, plus it has all the trimmings under the hood.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:06 1

45. psysect (Posts: 49; Member since: 27 Sep 2012)

check it dears:

The J Butterfly also offers IPX5 waterproofing and microSD expansion, so could be a hot little number if it keeps these features.


posted on 16 Nov 2012, 17:36 1

63. richardyarrell2011 (banned) (Posts: 510; Member since: 16 Mar 2011)

I cant help but laugh at these people thinking the HTC DNA is something that they will be able to do something with. Trust me that 12gb of internal space won't last long. And that 4 or 5 hrs worth of battery life will be pretty dreadful. The Galaxy Note 2 is the ultimate productivity device something totally all purporse that can't be touched with a TEN FOOT POLE. On the Galaxy Note 2's WORST DAY it will TRUMP any HTC DNA device that's for sure. We won't even discuss the clear cut storage options, 64sd card 16 gb internal and 50gb of dropbox. It's endless for the Galaxy Note 2...

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 20:47 5

67. darkskoliro (Posts: 1076; Member since: 07 May 2012)

I know you love the note 2. No disrespect.
But have a look at the battery figures before calling it 4-5 hours.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 23:53 3

74. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

Ya know, get yourself a laptop. That would really trump any tablet and phablet, let alone smartphone. That's the ultimate productivity device, totally all purpose. Why are you comparing this awesome smartphone to the phablet you love so much? Those are 2 different things.

posted on 17 Nov 2012, 00:59 3

76. LionStone (Posts: 743; Member since: 10 Dec 2010)

I know where you can put your 10 FOOT POLE !!

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 17:48 2

64. darkskoliro (Posts: 1076; Member since: 07 May 2012)

*and the dual amps
and the wide angle ff camera
and the quad core S4
and the build quality
and the looks
and yes definitely the display.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 19:55 3

66. metalpoet (unregistered)


posted on 16 Nov 2012, 21:11 3

68. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)

alright calm down with your caps lock lol

doesnt matter what the outcome was as you will have the 2 opposing sides attack and slate the other for no real reason other then to make them feel better about there chioce or opinion

i refer you to comment 63

definition of fanboy

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 21:36 2

69. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3108; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)

I hate to say it but that is exactly true. If it wasn't for the 5 inch 1080p display, this would just be another current line phone. I cannot believe HTC only put 16GB of internal memory with no micro sd card slot and such a small battery. This could have been the ultimate beast had it had a micro sd card slot and at least 3000 mAh battery.

posted on 18 Nov 2012, 18:45 1

88. bojan (Posts: 188; Member since: 06 Oct 2012)

no because it has the best camera quality on the market and its faster than any other phone on the market and so much more

posted on 28 Nov 2012, 01:56

95. Raymond_htc (Posts: 430; Member since: 06 Apr 2012)

Oh ho NO! The Speed of the Droid DNA is MUCH MUCH much Faster than ur biggy note 2. Look at the benchmark, Droid DNA IS 7500+ 2000 MORE than the Note 2. Any words now, Notesheeap?

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 07:51 3

2. brar.arsh (Posts: 200; Member since: 12 Sep 2012)


posted on 16 Nov 2012, 07:55 3

5. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)

Thats right.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 07:52 13

4. PackMan (Posts: 277; Member since: 09 Mar 2012)

I don't know......... Galaxy note is more about S-Pen than the screen size, although screen size is very important to make proper use of the S-Pen.
I think Droid DNA will compete more with the SIII than Note II.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 09:01 6

21. Jeradiah3 (Posts: 1032; Member since: 11 Feb 2010)

I agree. i dont know why they want to compare the DNA to the Note II. The DNA doesnt have a stylus or anything else that closely resembles a tablet. But I guess that people want to compare phone just to do so.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 09:51 8

28. McLTE (Posts: 821; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)

I agree..

I'm looking at this poll and thinking.. who would really vote for the DNA over the Note II?

I suppose it's a size thing.. most people are scared off by a phone as big as a Note II. That's OK.. the DNA should be a great phone too, but to me it's a different category.

Why will I completely ignore the DNA and snatch up the Note II?
1. Screen size. 5" is nice.. but 5.5 is awesome.
2. REMOVABLE BATTERY. I always have a backup.
3. SD card slot. - this is huge for me.. if for nothing else than being able to transfer files to the card/phone much faster. My nexus is a pain!

the 1080p screen is a huge selling point, and I'd like one.. but I've seen the Note II and for what it offers, I'm willing to sacrifice one more year on 1280 and get all that the Note II offers.


For those of us who live north, with the cold weather coming.. The S-Pen will be AWESOME for when wearing gloves!! :P

I also love all the other little features the Note II has baked into the software.

It's a no-brainer for me.. but I really do hope that the DNA is a huge hit. I hope they also come out with a DNA Maxx.. HTC needs a successful phone!

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 10:09 3

31. JC557 (Posts: 1516; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)

Well, the 1080 resolution isn't my main factor in liking the DNA. HTC is known to have nice loud earpieces without being harsh (something I was hoping for in the Droid Razer MAXX HD but it's still a contender), I find HTC device nice to hold, the 5" screen is nice round number in a size similar to that of the S3, and of course the S4 Pro has my attention as to what it can do.

In the past two weeks with cold temps in NYC I managed to use my Rezound while wearing my leather gloves. It was pretty cool but I tend to hate handling things with gloves. It just feels vague unless they're really thin.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 10:49 5

37. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

Actually, I think the DNA is competition for all of 2013s flagship smartphones (GS IV, Nexus 5, etc.). To qualify for Phablet category, the screen has to be at least 5.5 inches diagonal. In fact, I think 2013 Phablets will have 6+ inch iagonal screen size.

Those who want to be first with a 2013 Android flagship smartphone should look at the DNA. IMO, it has some really great specs, aside from the battery and no memory expansion.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:32 1

49. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

I think 2013 Phablets will have 6+ inch diagonal screen size.
Those are tablets! LOL Where's the end to this?
You are right. This thing competes with all flagships now and to be released in near future. It's already won me!

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:03 1

7. psysect (Posts: 49; Member since: 27 Sep 2012)

yeeeees...fans like dna coz its soooooooooo much beautifull , better build quality, better size , better performance , better camera, better screen , better ui & ...

i dont attract to note only for s pen or better battary..ok big battery is very nice but dna battries is just enoghe for a day.. beside this u can use of the best screen , perfomance & powerfull sound that i dont change it with note 2 although note 2 also is a fantastic phone.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:10 2

10. bloodline (Posts: 706; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)

I am picking the Galaxy note purely because the DNA is not coming to the UK.

Dam you HTC

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:21 4

12. psysect (Posts: 49; Member since: 27 Sep 2012)

dna is coming for uk & the other countries with different names my friend.


posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:26 8

14. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

Most idiotic poll ever made on this site.. I refused to even cast my vote, because the question doesn't make sense.
You PA geniuses weren't able to answer me the basic question on HOW THE DNA COMPARES TO NOTE MORE THAN TO THE S3!?!

"Superior on pretty much everything except for the storage "
Are you being paid by HTC ?!?
What about the Wacom digitizing screen technology implementation with the s pen?
What about the 0.5inches larger screen?
What about the 1080mah larger battery?

The ONLY advantages for DNA are the pixel density..that can't even be noticed in normal usage, compared with the Note..and the more compact, lighter body.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 09:09 5

24. true1984 (Posts: 823; Member since: 23 May 2012)

you forgot about the processor...

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:37 3

50. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

You forgot the build quality.
You forgot the benchmarks this powerhouse achieved.
You forgot....

posted on 17 Nov 2012, 16:02 2

80. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

Build quality?
It's an all plastic device!
The Note 2 is faster in real life use! (Check out the verge review and what they said about performance )
Now who forgot what?

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:28 8

15. mno.daddy (Posts: 3; Member since: 16 Nov 2012)

I didn't vote because the DROID DNA is a SMARTPHONE not a PHABLET.
BTW waiting the global DNA to upgrade from the amazing One X .

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 13:11 3

55. Jeradiah3 (Posts: 1032; Member since: 11 Feb 2010)

I dont know why people think that the DNA is a phablet. its a powerful smartphone, but it doesnt have the features of a tablet or phablet like the Note and Note II

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 08:48 5

19. preet27in (banned) (Posts: 173; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)

woaaa welllllllllll........... its too easy for droid dna to beat note2. look at the build quality of this monster ( dna) its just amazing and damn good, and weighs even lighter, where as note2 is much more cheap in looks. and moreover htc has better screen and display and offcorse a damn good processor and chipset.look at that pixel count its amazing to produce such count on a 5 inch screen. its a whole new series and i dont think it should b compared with note2, as note2 dosent stand in dna 's way at all. htc makes incredible phone but hey this time i hope they do well in marketing as well. HTC ROCKS with the dna unleashed and hope they will do better than any ...... so called phablets. good luck htc.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 10:01 4

29. McLTE (Posts: 821; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)

Seriously.. what are you smoking? Can I have some?

Build quality is not that big of an issue.. my "plastic" galaxy nexus has held up VERY well and guess what.. I can remove the back and put in a spare battery!

Weight.. sure the Note II will weigh a bit more, but what's funny is I compared it to my old Droid 1 from Moto.. and they weigh about the same! Weight for either phone is a non issue.

Screen? DNA.. major props to HTC for that screen! I'll be ok with one more 1280 screen phone.. I'm happy with the Note II in that regard.

Battery? Note II without a doubt.. both in size and removable.

Storate? Please.. Note II again

Processor? DNA.. BUT I doubt in real world anyone would be able to say they could tell a difference when playing games. Non factor.

Software? Note II... by a MILE. My wife has an HTC phone.. I HATE the UI.

S-PEN? Note II of course.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 12:50 4

52. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

Build quality is very, very important. It's not because your cheap build is going to break into pieces from everyday use. It's about the feeling when holding a product that oozes high quality, premium, expensive, etc. Everybody likes that.

Weight is important for the overall feel of the phone in your hand. That's why many find Note uncomfortable to hold, cheap slick plastic on the back, a little too heavy, a little too big...

Screen is simply the best.

Battery? Yes, that's a bad thing. But not a deal breaker for many, apparently. It's reported to last through the day. I charge phones every night anyway. It's not like you'll have to charge Note every other night, right? So not a big deal.

Storage? Mmmm... let me think.... Ahhmmmm...well... Don't know what to say :) You win!!!

Processor? Yea, baby!

Software? Many people actually LOVE Sense. DNA wins. I hate my S III's UI. And even more so, my GTab's UI.

S-Pen is nice, but it comes with phablets, this is a smartphone.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 14:22 1

57. Immolate (Posts: 310; Member since: 17 Jun 2011)

Build quality might be that important Owlet, but it really has nothing to do with how the phone looks. Both of these phones look like premium devices, with a quirk or two. But once you have them in your hand, you'll have a visceral reaction that will determine your perception of the build quality. That plus how the phone holds up, how any moving pieces move and other ways in which you physically interact with the device determine build quality. Until you've held them both, you won't really have a relevant opinion about relative build quality.

I expect that the Note 2 will come off very much like the Galaxy S3. Other than size, the Note 2 is almost identical to the S3 in form and construction. I have an S3, and it has excellent build quality, though not in the same league as my old Motorola phones. I had a thunderbolt, and really liked its build quality, at least until the screen broke. After I replaced the screen, it was never the same. My fault. In retrospect, I would put the S3's build quality just a tad higher than the Tbolt's, but I'd also attribute that to a more mature design and manufacturing process, and would expect newer HTC's like the One-X to be significantly better.

Weight actually enhances the user's perception of build quality for most people. A heavy phone feels more solid, other things being equal.

On processor, both phones are extremely well-equipped, but the Note 2 appears to be able to handle its screen a bit better. I suppose that's a combo of the HTC having a lot more pixels to move around, and the comparatively processor-intensive nature of Sense.

For UI, a lot of people liking it doesn't make it the winner. over 40 million people voted for Romney. That's insanely a lot. He lost. File this one under personal preference.

But UI isn't just look and feel. It's also functionality, and the Note 2 has an amazing collection of things that it can actually do that aren't shared with many other phones, and some that are unique to it. That's a clear advantage for the Note.

I'm still torn between these two phones and it's a great spot to be in. For now, I 'm going to wait and gather more information before making my decision.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 14:52 2

60. Owlet (Posts: 450; Member since: 21 Feb 2011)

I appreciate your opinion. But I don't agree. I think SIII, which I type on right now, looks and feels cheap. I had TBolt, IMO, it was a lot more solid built. And Rezound before this SIII was designed and built better. I just really like HTC design and quality, how they feel and look. SIII is not in the same league.

Here's an unrequested advice for you: :) If a phablet suits your needs better - get the Note. If a smartphone is what you need - get the DNA. It's awesome. :)))

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 15:20 1

62. OptimusOne (Posts: 694; Member since: 22 May 2012)

you seem really biased towardsthe gnote 2

just because you can't tell the difference in games doesn't mean exynos is in the same league with s4

build quality isn't just for dropping phones. see when you hold a phone, your hands touch it. your hands want to touch something good right? well i think an HTC phone would feel better than a samsung phone(with a few exceptions, one being the focus flash)
s4 is a whole 10 steps higher. but wait for tiomap5 thats gonna rock

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 17:52 1

65. darkskoliro (Posts: 1076; Member since: 07 May 2012)

If I ever see you comment about how "fast" samsung processors are in any future articles, im going to have to call you the biggest fanboy out.

posted on 19 Nov 2012, 08:29 1

92. preet27in (banned) (Posts: 173; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)

yes but from ur point of view only. note2 is laaging faaar behind. and why would u say u doubt in real world. hahaha we already r in the real world mr. and note2 is not even better than one x, leave the rest. user interface of htc is damn better than touch wiz. tell me one thing if sense is not good then why the hell sammy is trying to copy widgets and other stuff like the BIG CLOCK from htc????? u have an answer for that????? u must have read an article saying that " other companies are still finding it hard to make widgets like htc " woaa owaa now u r gna say oh that article hardly matters
? arent u?? lol. sammy is only wining in terms of marketing and nothing else. processor of dna is faar faar better than any phone , even ur sammy s3 or note 2. and hey hey let me tell u..... htc one x is way faster after jelly bean update. whereas samsung is still slower than one x after jelly.nywaysss good luck with u and ur note2..

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 09:02 3

22. _Bone_ (Posts: 2154; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)

Can it deal with the Note II? Oh yeah, the DNA is a great device with some future HW. But it is very heavily bottlenecked by the lack of SD slot and proper amount of battery juice, I'd choose the Note II over it any day of the century.

posted on 16 Nov 2012, 09:05 1

23. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)

Wither Phablet you cannot go wrong...

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories