Why would a Galaxy S10 Lite exist? What would its price be?

Why would a Galaxy S10 Lite exist? What would its price be?
In recent weeks, we’ve been hearing more and more rumors about an alleged Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (SM-G770F) being in the works. Whatever leaks there are suggest that it will be a phone with powerful internals, which also comes at a price cheaper than the main Galaxy S10 model.

“But wait! We already have a cheaper Galaxy S10 - it’s the Galaxy S10e

True, true. As it stands, the Galaxy S10e costs $749, the Galaxy S10 is $899, and the Galaxy S10+ is $999. But that portfolio isn’t great for Samsung, especially after Apple turned the market on its head this September. Let’s just ponder that for a while

The Apple switcheroo


Over the past couple of years, smartphone manufacturers have been really beefing up their flagships’ prices. This pretty much started with the iPhone X in 2017, which launched with a starting price of $999 — a pretty outrageous number back then. Wouldn’t you know it, however, the market followed suit. And suddenly everyone was trying to push $1k smartphones.

Why? Because sales are down. Smartphones have hit such a point in their evolution that you can hang on to your premium handset for 3 to 4 years and still get a very good experience. Kind of like laptops, they don’t require to be upgraded every year or two. This, naturally, meant that companies needed to up the margin if they were to keep the revenue growth.

But just boosting prices out of the blue wasn’t going to cut it. So manufacturers started diversifying their flagship lines. Apple, again, spearheaded this with 2018’s iPhone XR. It had a starting price of $749, which was way, way cheaper than the $999 iPhone XS. The phone felt kind of gimped — with just one camera, no 3D Touch, and a LED display instead of the OLED panel.


Still, it was extremely successful, since the general userbase doesn’t care that much about OLED, 3D Touch, or a telephoto lens. The phone had what it needed — the new Face ID, a large screen, a good app ecosystem, fast performance, and good picture quality.

Then, it 2019, Apple dropped a much bigger bomb. The iPhone 11, which is the successor of the XR, starts at an even lower price of $699. It does have a secondary camera — an ultra-wide-angle one since that is proving to be very popular as of late — and iOS 13 has been completely designed with no 3D Touch in mind. That’s because even the $999 iPhone 11 Pro doesn’t have 3D Touch. The phone offers most of the features and the same hardware power of the bigger models.


And — here is the very important part — in all presentations and marketing, the iPhone 11 is pushed as “the iPhone”. Instead of it being the “offshoot, budget model”, Apple is presenting it as the flagship. And it looks the part too — whether you like the notch or not, the iPhone 11's Face ID gives it the iPhone identity. The Pro models are “the spinoffs for those that want more and are willing to pay more”. This is key. Over the past couple of years, we’ve been dreading that we will need to spend $1k if we want a flagship. Apple just came out and said “Oh, no. Here — this is the iPhone. That’ll be $700, just like 3 years ago.” Rest assured that the iPhone 11 will absolutely break the sales meter after the holiday season rolls around.

Samsung was left out to dry


This year, Samsung was really set on holding the “expensive flagship, cheap alternative” course. The Galaxy S10e is miles away from the main Galaxy S10 model. It "only" has two cameras (wide-angle and ultra-wide-angle) and it has a side-mounted fingerprint scanner instead of an in-screen one. It doesn't have the signature curved screen, which instantly makes it not look like a Samsung flagship. One can easily ignore these problems, but here comes the big one — the phone's screen is just small (5.8 inches, 19:9 ratio), and small phones, while they do have a small set of fans, are just not what the majority of the market wants. The S10e does not feel like the Galaxy. It feels like the cheaper offshoot.


Then, there is the Galaxy Note 10 and the Note 10+ duo. The Note 10 was just a slap in the face of the Note brand fans — a lack of a microSD card slot, a lower resolution, no ToF camera. Again, these don’t sound like big problems on their own, but keep in mind that Samsung has always marketed the Note line as the phone for the people who want it all — the most advanced technology, all the features, everything that can possibly fit in there. At $949, the Note 10 just felt like a cut-down version that only exists to push you to buy the $1,099 Note 10+.

TL; DR. What’s the Galaxy S10 Lite? Price?


So, essentially, the only answer that Samsung has for the iPhone 11 is the Galaxy S10e, and that’s just not going to cut it. Remember, the 11 is the iPhone — it has the hardware, it has the software, it has the same Face ID as on the expensive models, and it has a large screen, which most people want. The Galaxy S10e doesn’t have the in-screen fingerprint scanner, it’s small and cramped, it’s not even marketed as “the Galaxy S10”, and costs $50 more than “the iPhone”.


So, what is Samsung to do? The shopping season is coming up and it’s going to be a massacre. It can’t just permanently drop the price of the regular Galaxy S10 (outside of special promo day deals), since that’ll cause an uproar. Customers that already bought it will feel cheated and the userbase will start questioning if there was an unjustified price inflation to begin with.

No, no, we need a new model. Preferably with all the lessons learned — cut corners very carefully. The leaks already suggest that the phone will come with the powerful Snapdragon 855 and a whopping 8 GB of RAM. It will probably not have a curved Edge screen, since that costs a ton to produce and it will be a nice differentiator between the S10 and S10 Lite. In order to give it some sort of "Samsung identity", it'll probably have that Infinity O cutout — the selfie camera will be in the top center, like on the Galaxy Note 10.

Most probably, the Galaxy S10 Lite will look very similar to the Galaxy S10e — same shape, same design language, a side-mounted fingerprint scanner, but a bigger, more comfortable screen — probably around 6.4 inches (19:9 ratio), though rumors suggest up to 6.7 inches. There will either be a dual camera setup, mirroring the S10e's wide-angle and ultra-wide-angle cameras, or a triple cam setup, but the third one will be a depth sensor, added "for looks" with no actual telephoto lens. Its price can’t drop below the S10e, so I assume it will meet it at $749 with very generous “turn in your old phone” deals on day 1. As for release — "as soon as possible" is the best guess here. Samsung probably wants to create some buzz and gain some momentum before the holiday season comes.



Keep in mind this is pure speculation and there’s the possibility that the Lite might not even make it to the US market. But I would absolutely not be surprised if the Galaxy S11e (or however it ends up being called) is something like this, with a 2020 processor upgrade and an even lower, $700 price-tag.

FEATURED VIDEO

11 Comments

1. japkoslav

Posts: 1539; Member since: Feb 19, 2017

Christmas bonuses?

2. Vyshak75

Posts: 81; Member since: Mar 03, 2016

Come on... So the S10e is a cheap phone and iphone 11 is a flagship. S10e has the same display cut out as its siblings. It has dual camera. It has fingerprint scanner, even though its on the side. It has fast charging. The same as its siblings. It has FHD display. Does iphone11 has an OLED display? Same LCD as previous XR. Does iphone11 has fast charging support? Same 5w. And the storage? 64gb. So which one is a flagship and which one is a cheaper one.

3. middlehead

Posts: 462; Member since: May 12, 2014

Bigger screen would NOT be more comfortable. The s10e size is perfect, the only issue I have with mine is the resolution. They should've kept QHD instead of dropping to FHD.

4. Cat97

Posts: 1969; Member since: Mar 02, 2017

Just look at the picture above with S10e and iPhone 11 side by side. Game over. Nothing more should be said. OLED vs LCD. Same battery size despite iPhone 11 being much bigger and thicker. Small punch hole vs Notch. Small bezels vs large overall bezels. Always On Display vs ...nothing. Headphone jack vs...nothing. Fingerprint sensor vs Face ID (which is there solely because a good under display fingerprint sensor doesn't exist).

11. Plutonium239

Posts: 1239; Member since: Mar 17, 2015

I would argue that the under display fingerprint reader in the galaxy note 10+ is very good. I have no issues with it whatsoever and it is far more reliable than the fingerprint scanner on my old galaxy s8+. At least in my experience. It recognizes my thumb 99% of the time. Perhaps once a week at the most does it fail to read my thumb.

5. RocketDoc

Posts: 21; Member since: Jul 24, 2018

The S10e has the same number of cameras as the iPhone 11 and the same size screen as the iPhone 11 Pro, so I don't entirely buy into this analysis. Flat screen instead of curved is an advantage over the more expensive Samsung models. Adding a 6th "flagship" model makes Samsung's lineup even more incoherent; I suppose it will be the sweet spot for some customers, but will it bring incremental sales or just shift the current mix?

6. ssnxxi

Posts: 1; Member since: Oct 31, 2019

This is nonsense. The only reason to chose S10e instead of s10 or s10+ is the size. and a couple of details: physical fingerprint sensor and flat screen. The buyer of this type of phone is not really motivated by a few dollars less. I have a note 9 and I was tired of the big size. Considered the iPhone 11 pro but I hate the notch and I prefer android. So I bought the s10e and I'm really happy. This is in fact the only "small" sized flagship performance phone on android side available today. If you prefer iOS and do not care about the notch IP 11 pro is your choice. But not the 11 - it's too big and the screen is really not at the same level as the s10e. A s10 lite simply does not make sense and who would buy it anyway with the s10 becoming cheaper every week?

7. Deadeye

Posts: 131; Member since: Jul 26, 2019

Wow, this whole article is utter garbage. S10e is for those who want a smaller phone. You just completely misunderstood. Bashing Samsung while ignoring flaws of iPhone 11. It doesn't matter if it's presented as flagship, it´s specs are nowhere near flagship phone. But Apple customers mostly want a logo on the back and don´t care about the rest. This is why is iPhone successful - it´s cheaper and it still has that logo.

8. sebstin

Posts: 192; Member since: Dec 03, 2015

Lite means it should be smaller than 10e, slightly decent downgraded specs with price range of 250-300.. 140mmX70mm for 5-5.5" form size factor is perfect... How did lite means 6.5" phone when s10e is 5.8" size?!!!

9. richaardvark

Posts: 2; Member since: Nov 02, 2019

My comment is going to be really dumb/perhaps seen as not really related or relevant and/or/additionally I might be viewed as a lowly pauper who can't possibly relate or understand because my phone lacks a curved screen/finger print sensor (*both* internal and on the side or whatever they were taking about above, lol). But I joined the comments just now to say I'm very pleased with my new Galaxy a10e (Verizon variant.) I'm kind of perplexed by Samsung's business strategy here, releasing so many lines and levels of Android devices that don't even look too dramatically different from one another. It's my understanding the "a" family of phones have been around and quite popular in Asia for sometme now and would be considered an "economy" line of phones, whereas the"s" lines would be considered the flagship variant. I do recognize the hardware limitations in my device as compared to the s devices (relatively low RAM, cameras not as amazing, the lack of finger print sensors as mentioned above, etc.) but I am so far away more impressed than I ever expected to be on what I thought would be a burner phone. This is a solidly-built device and performes very well for me.

10. richaardvark

Posts: 2; Member since: Nov 02, 2019

I've gone the flagship / thousand-dollar phone route before, but it's nice to have been able to have paid off the phone in a couple of weeks (I think it was $185 total?) And that's nice to not have to worry y about

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.