California once again is close to making net neutrality a state law

California once again is close to making net neutrality a state law
For a set of rules left on the side of the road to die by FCC chairman Ajit Pai, net neutrality is making an impressive rally attempt. Just the other day, we told you that the attorneys general of 22 states and the District of Columbia had filed a suit with a U.S. appeals court seeking to overturn the FCC's repeal of net neutrality. While the issue will be heard in the courts, several states including California and New York are trying to have it passed into law. Most Americans are in favor of net neutrality.

A bill in California, SB822, was ready in June to be the first in the country to make net neutrality law. It passed the state senate and was expected to have no problem in the Democratic controlled State Assembly. From there, it would receive Governor Jerry Brown's signature. However, an assemblyman named Miguel Santiago watered down the bill, preventing it from passing. Santiago, a Democrat, had his campaign partly financed with contributions from AT&T. Most wireless carriers and ISPs are against the idea of all streaming content being treated the same. Net neutrality prevents wireless providers and ISPs from charging content providers to access a "faster lane."  It also blocks firms like AT&T from banning or throttling media streams just because they don't agree with the content being disseminated.

But SB822 is alive and well as was just passed by the State Assembly's Communications and Conveyance Committee by a 9-3 vote (all those in favor of the bill were Democrats) and now heads back to the entire State Assembly. An agreement between SB822 author State Sen. Scott Wiener and assemblyman Santiago should lead the way to passage of the bill. Once Governor Brown signs on the dotted line, the Obama-era rules will be codified as law in California. SB822 actually is a little stricter than the original version of net neutrality because it blocks content providers from paying carriers and ISPs to offer their streaming content to subscribers with a zero-rating.

source: ArsTechnica (photo credit: Nation of Change)



1. D34ever

Posts: 236; Member since: Jul 14, 2018

Keeping my fingers crossed.

2. andrewc31394

Posts: 303; Member since: Jun 23, 2012

f**k yes! i can't stand politics but when these greedy ass politicians start getting in the tech space they need to be kept in check.

3. cncrim

Posts: 1590; Member since: Aug 15, 2011

Vote in November flush out swamp, then Net Neutrality will be back.

4. audibot

Posts: 687; Member since: Jan 26, 2017

its funny the pic with the old lady that has no idea why she is there or what the internet is, she still has dial-up with Netscape and AOL mail lol. also funny how the dems are now against what they do to others that they dont like, " your show offends me i want it off the air " lol o sjw got to love them the rest of my anime peps are hating the fact that they have turned the anime hair into a sjw thing,

5. rouyal

Posts: 1583; Member since: Jan 05, 2018

“Internet fiefdom” The left cant meme. Democratic Party: the party of protesting cat ladies and spinsters. Even the Chinese came up with a derogatory word for American sjws/liberals.

6. ibap

Posts: 871; Member since: Sep 09, 2009

All those thinking this is funny - yeah, can't wait to hear what you'll have to say when your internet traffic is slowed and you think you shouldn't pay any more for it. I don't think the carriers have figured out how they're going to stick it to all of us while raking in more bucks, and it will surely get worse over time as the loss of NN is monetized by them.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.