Will display aspect ratio affect your buying decisions in 2018?

5. Lumbergh (banned) (Posts: 463; Member since: 14 Feb 2016)

Exactly. +1

I will say, I enjoy my Mate 10's 16:9 aspect ratio (and flat screen).

25. eelpout (Posts: 18; Member since: 13 Oct 2016)

I'm hoping that Sony goes this route too for their new Xperia's this year.

31. Stormrider (Posts: 17; Member since: 30 Aug 2016)

Sony opted out of QHD for similar reasons, so they probably won't follow the herd this time either.

34. TheOracle1 (Posts: 890; Member since: 04 May 2015)

Sony have great phones, great hardware and nice software but their design philosophy is dated. It's clear to me that they've ignored or become arrogant/complacent with their designs. If Sony produced a Mi Mix/S8 type phone they would sell just because they're Sony so you know it going to be damn good and very reliable. They're stupid.

27. chenski (Posts: 669; Member since: 22 Mar 2015)

Me too, love it

13. TMHKR (Posts: 148; Member since: 08 Dec 2012)

This! I like my screens flat, without rounded corners.

15. medtxa (Posts: 1585; Member since: 02 Jun 2014)

You need to realize not all smartphone is a samsung, there is also an iphone too!

43. cocoy (Posts: 178; Member since: 30 Oct 2015)

Exactly, this is the reason why I chose the Galaxy Tab S3 over the note and S8+ because of that useless curve screen. I live without the good camera and video stabilizer because I am not a photographer nor a selfie lover. It's bulky but I have another Android phone and an iPhone so not that much of an issue.

44. Mr.Pussy (Posts: 293; Member since: 16 Feb 2017)

Samsung should do the Flat edition.

4. makatijules (banned) (Posts: 835; Member since: 11 Dec 2017)

So you are basically saying, you don't want display innovation to progress?

You ever thought that because phones have 6" displays, that the 16:9 aspect ratio doesn't properly fit?

It doesn't fit properly because the display is so wide in landscape.

If you could take a 6" display and change the aspect ratio to 16:9, you would have black bars on both sides because the screen is wider.

And if you stretch it to fit, you would get the same effect you get now. Part if the display area of of th3 video or photo would be cut off at th2 top and bottom, and when it's wide, the media will look stretched.

Once the rest of the industry catches up and release media at the new aspect ratio of 18:9, then it will look exactly like it's suppose too.

No one cried when we advanced from 4:3 to 16:9. I don't see 2hat the issue Is now.

6. Dr.Phil (Posts: 1883; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

Yes, but you are also only seeing one issue and one solution: media consumption. What about viewing text or emails or web pages or applications on your phone? An 18:9 6 inch display phone has less screen real estate than a 16:9 6 inch display phone. So in order to achieve the same screen real estate they have to increase the screen size which makes the phone longer and therefore harder to reach stuff when you're using your thumb.

18. cmdacos (Posts: 1897; Member since: 01 Nov 2016)

And less scrolling required with a 2:1 ratio so you need your thumb less. All good for me. 18:9 content looks great.

35. makatijules (banned) (Posts: 835; Member since: 11 Dec 2017)

Huh? I compared the Note 8 to the Note 5 showing text and the Note 8 does show a bit more info vs the Note 5.

Maybe because some website haven't fixed co tent to fit peobablg4you might see such.

But that hasn't been my experience.

Are you sure you have your Galaxy set to the guest resolution and not the FHD+ resolution?

9. Humanoid (Posts: 489; Member since: 11 Dec 2017)

Innovation?

Tell me why TVs and Computers are not going through this " innovation".

Everything we watch is made for TV. Nothing can be made 2:1.

My point of view.. Example

Smartphone A 2017 : 5.5" , 16:9 , each top/bottom bezel with 1,2cm.

Smartphone A 2018: 5.7" 16:9, bezels 0.9cm each.

Difference between 5.5 and 5.7 is tiny.
Add 0.2 to screen, then trim bezels a bit.

Imagine S8 as a Note 7 but 4 or 5 mm shorter. Would be that unconfortable?

S8 is 1mm shorter than S7 Edge, but S7e does not have screen buttons to take up part of the space. S7e also has 600 mAh more.

Was it worth?

12. HansP (Posts: 542; Member since: 16 Oct 2011)

On my Amazon Prime Video almost every movie and basically every new series is 2.35:1 now on my ultrawide screen. The taller screen is unfortunately also becoming a useful requirement on simple things like mobile web browsing. More and more sites are filling an increasingly larger area on the top and bottom with persistent ads.

36. makatijules (banned) (Posts: 835; Member since: 11 Dec 2017)

For one, most tvs are using standard injury resolutions.

Most the are either 1920x1080 (FHD), 1440x2160 (QHD) and 2160x3840 (UHD).

Those are all 16:9 aspect ratio

There are actually 720p+ and qhd+ the where 16:9 content does not fit.

Look it up.

I think it's best to stick with industry standards. However I know an OEM who NEVER used industry standard resolutions and used software tricks to make the content fit. Yet no one ever complained about it.

In fact, only has used one industrybstabdard resolution when they brought the to iPhone 6.

11. TMHKR (Posts: 148; Member since: 08 Dec 2012)

Lol, "display innovation"

24. eelpout (Posts: 18; Member since: 13 Oct 2016)

right?

I guess that by logic we should go to 3:2 for phones. Seems to work well for some laptops. 2:1 just isn't comfortable for some people with smaller hands.

28. chenski (Posts: 669; Member since: 22 Mar 2015)

I would hardly call 18:9 innovation, its really just a matter of taste

37. makatijules (banned) (Posts: 835; Member since: 11 Dec 2017)

When you improve a product, no matter how small the improvement is, it is an innovation.

I am not saying 18:9.5 I'd a good or bad idea. It is an improvement.

Once movies are recorded this way, then and only then will you see it's benefit, just like 16:9.

When I take photos or videos and compare them which ones I down at 1440, I see the photo and video gets more into the shot. The media is slightly sharper due to more pixels. Text is sharper as well.

38. makatijules (banned) (Posts: 835; Member since: 11 Dec 2017)

I think the issue for most is, if an innovation doesn't bring a sizable change or proves to bring an extra benefit, they don't see it as innovative.

To each his own!

Samsu g didn't have to give the S8 18:9. O think they only did it, so it matches it 6" plus sibling.

And the Note 8 is even larger.

Take a phone with a 16:9 aspect ratio and take a screen shot, and then take Photoshop and change the aspect ratio to 18:9 and match the S8+ and Note 8 and see what happens.

The realization of how good something is, is how much support it gains.

Netflix, Amazon and others are all supporting it.

It's not something we have to have, it was done so that content would fit the display reasonably better.

The optimum resolution for 16:9 on a small display would need to not exceed 5.8".

Who h questions why Apple didn't stick with a 16:9 res for the X.

39. makatijules (banned) (Posts: 835; Member since: 11 Dec 2017)

No tbey do not. You are just usonv it to attack something you don't like.

There is nothing wrong with the S8+ or Note 8.