The Street says Android users know nothing about their phones
posted by Alan F. / Jun 24, 2012, 12:31 AM
The brainchild of Jim Cramer, The Street pointed out that despite the large marketshare advantage that Android owns globally, 69% of new apps started by developers in the first quarter were written for iOS while 31% were written for Android. That stat from Flurry Analytics seems to contradict other stats, but does make sense when you look at the numbers from Net Applications. Those figures show that 61.2% of all mobile web traffic comes from the mobile Safari browser while only 18.6% of mobile web traffic belongs to those using the stock Android browser.
already explained the fallacy of the latter statement about updating the operating system and we are sure that not only would many of our loyal readers disagree with the other statements, they would also shoot down The Street's opinion that Android users have no loyalty to the platform.
Before a posse is put together to march to The Street's offices carrying torches, just understand that this just an opinion and everyone is entitled to have one, no matter how wrong you might think it is. It is also a matter of interpreting the numbers. Take the Wi-Fi figures that the blog relies so heavily on. It just so happens that Apple iPhone users need to be on Wi-Fi to get the clearest look at YouTube videos while Android users can get the same sharp look using 3G. In addition, until iOS 6 is released, Face Time users have to use Wi-Fi for the video chatting feature to work. Thus, iOS users have extra incentives to use Wi-Fi that Android users don't have.
We're not saying that someone's opinion is wrong. What we are saying is that there could be different reasons for the numbers that The Street so quickly uses in an attempt to prove its point. They say that the numbers show that Android users are clueless about their phone while we just pointed out other legitimate reasons for the figures.
Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010
Perhaps The Street's editors should re-focus their energies on tracking bulls and bears? Sure, some Android handset users don't know much about their handset's O/S, but across-the-board? 70% is 7 out of every 10 owners. Doubt it.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 12:48 AM 36
Posts: 28; Member since: Feb 18, 2012
same here. android is NOT complicated. it's more complex than ios because it's not dumbed down. and it said that we don't use internet and wifi? isn't that one of a smartphones main purposes? they probably took a poll with older people who have mid to low range android phones. total bull
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 12:53 AM 32
Posts: 77; Member since: Mar 22, 2012
Agree. Android is not complicated to use at all. It may only appear complex at first because it gives you more control over your phone than Apple's iOS does over the iPhone. While the IPhone's grid of icons may be initially more intuitive than the homescreen you're first greeted with on Android, I found that once I told a friend (who came from user a feature phone) how to find all their apps and to think of the homescreen as a desktop on which they could put shortcuts to their favourite apps and widgets that put information and controls within easy reach, it clicked for them and they were then more confident in exploring the phone for themselves. When it comes to loyalty though, I know many 'normal' people who bought or want an iPhone because of the solid build and its premium look, and because everyone, including their friends, seemed to be getting one. Once they started buying apps from the App Store they felt compelled to stay with Apple because they'd already invested in that ecosystem and were content with the user experience and didn't want to have to learn a new UI on a rival platform. I wouldn't call that loyalty. I think the only people who are loyal to a platform are the geeky tech heads. :)
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 9:28 AM 3
Posts: 654; Member since: Apr 30, 2012
i see it a lot. people coming from feature phones to android typically dont know squat about them. and even after youd show them the basics like how to turn wifi on and off, how to set up email, texting, calls and all that, they still dont know how to utilize it.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 11:45 AM 1
Posts: 256; Member since: Mar 20, 2012
The Wall Street journal had been really biased against Android lately, either Apple gave them iPhones or they're paying WSJ for those articles. The statements they're making are ridiculous, I've seen just as many if not more iPhone users not know anything about their phone. Ever go into an Apple store? Have you seen how many people are at the genius bar just for help with their iPhones because they know nothing about it?
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 12:03 PM 4
Posts: 345; Member since: Oct 26, 2011
If you follow the link, and read the comments under his article, nearly every single reader that posted something about the article posted negatively about his article. This dude is an idiot and completely biased.
posted on Jun 25, 2012, 10:52 AM 0
Posts: 195; Member since: Jun 04, 2012
This is bull, Me myself as a tech person knows which one is harder to use, and believe me iOS is very very very easy to use. Here's my Opinion about the two regarding to the use of both: #1 Apl: Apple made their UI Platform very simple+restricted for all ages so those less tech savvy people wouldn't have a hard time adventuring in their UI And: Unlike Android, their UI is very advance, They do not only have plain icons like iOS, files+thing are managed by you, yourself, which I think is very professional IMO #2 Apl: Apple has poor customization, no widgets and such, which in my opinion are very important, because it gives flavor+spice to your UI And: You are free to customize anything you want to your liking, any custom roms+launchers and such *this is where the tech experts take part, making roms+launchers which I think is very tech savvy part of Android, trust me I know a lot of tech savvy people, and majority of them are Android Users. Conclusion: If Wall Street says that majority of Android user are not tech savvy, why do majority of Android users know how to put custom roms+launchers? Explain me that. So does this mean that Apple user are more tech savvy than Android? Come on "The Street" are you going to be that sarcastic to make a silly unproven poll which I believe is not true at all, I sense something fishy about this poll.
posted on Jun 27, 2012, 1:03 AM 0
Posts: 578; Member since: Mar 21, 2012
Just keep in mind that while The Street is the one with the interpretation of the numbers, the stats actually come from a comScore survey. Anyone who disagrees with The Street needs to focus on the blog's use of the figures to match their viewpoint. The numbers themselves come from sources mentioned in the article. Alan F.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 12:51 AM 4
Posts: 3; Member since: Jun 24, 2012
While my main disagreement is with the conclusions drawn from the numbers, I do believe that the numbers themselves are worth questioning. While a small percentage of users use the stock android browser, that doesn't mean they don't browse the web. All that says is that people don't use the stock browser (probably because it sucks). I myself use Dolphin browser for the most part. There are a lot of browser options though. So I believe that statistic is invalid for the argument being made.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 3:34 AM 6
Posts: 17133; Member since: Jun 17, 2009
It all depends on what user agent you set on your browser. I also use Dolphin HD, and I set the user agent to Desktop. When I go to websites, I show up as a Safari user on Mac OSx. Other browsers may use a different UA string for desktop. If your UA string is set to Android, you will show up as an Android user.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 9:59 AM 1
Posts: 279; Member since: Oct 19, 2011
Funny, most iOS users I know dont' know s**t about their phone!!!! all they know is asking me back "is there's an app for that?" " or " I dunno, is this like this?"
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 4:16 AM 8
Posts: 1319; Member since: Oct 07, 2011
Yeah my girlfriend put a live wallpaper on her phone and the girl she works with wanted one too (she has an iPhone4 or 4S). Apparently the convo went like this: Girl: Ooh! I want one of those! GF: It's a live wallpaper. Girl: Where do I get one? GF: Look in the market. Girl: What's the app called? GF: It's just a live wallpaper. Girl: But what's the app called? GF: Just search for "live wallpaper" Girl: BUT WHAT'S THE APP CALLED GF: *Sigh*
posted on Jun 25, 2012, 8:22 AM 1
Posts: 33; Member since: Mar 01, 2012
They are many holes in this article, and very bias. They make jokes about android names and "educating" android users. You can tell the author was bashing Google. This article was very opinionated and doesn't hold much weight.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 12:31 PM 3
Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008
Might have well have been written by taco and gallito. That was an article with a definite agenda on its mind. Not gonna waste my time poking holes in it... Swiss cheese doesnt have that many holes in it.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 1:14 PM 5
Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009
The trouble with a blog is that any dumbass can write one and come up with half assed, biased opinions. I think if anything that when the general populace hears about this piece there will be some backlash, because the (rather snobbish) inference is that "Android is popular, but its users don't know how to use it. Therefore, Android users are mostly drooling idiots." I have as much respect as anyone for those who have found reasonable ways to be financially successful, but if this is the kind of stuffy, white bread scoffing that the rich partake in, then f**k them.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 12:56 AM 19
Posts: 5506; Member since: Oct 08, 2009
Basically android is cheap so people get it. It's what I've been saying all along. I've also said all along that android users aren't tech savvy. They don't even browse the web or know how to access wifi lol.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 1:56 PM 2
Posts: 17133; Member since: Jun 17, 2009
But they do know that changing a user agent string will fool websites and be recorded as a different browser and OS. And they do know that 720p is a higher resolution than 640p. Seriously, you are the biggest argument for Android users (and any 5th grader) being more tech savvy than iOS users. SGSIII, not cheap - most preordered device ever. RAXR Maxx not cheap - biggest selling device on Verizon last quarter. I personally paid more for my Thunderbolt than I would have for an iPhone.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 2:05 PM 2
Posts: 5506; Member since: Oct 08, 2009
Razr Maxx is not the best selling device on Verizon last quarter it was iPhone. Can you stop ignoring real facts please. iPhone was 50% of ALL smartphones sold on VZW last quarter. 61% of ALL mobile web traffic comes from iOS. You can keep ignoring the facts but reality is stacked against you.
posted on Jun 24, 2012, 5:33 PM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):