T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II benchmark tests

T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II benchmark tests
On the outside, it resembles its close brother in Samsung’s version of the Galaxy S II – the Samsung Epic 4G Touch. Internally though, there is a shakeup of some sort going on seeing that it’s powered by a 1.5GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 processor coupled with 1GB of RAM. Obviously, it’s a stark difference to the 1.2GHz dual-core Exynos processor used by the clan, but nevertheless, it’s by far what makes the handset different.

After playing around with the AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II most recently, we have to say that there is a noticeable difference in the performance of T-Mobile’s version – especially if you’ve played with another Galaxy S II already. Even though its operation while navigating across the homescreen is smooth for the most part, we can meticulously see some evidence of choppiness with its movement. Moreover, it’s not the same buttery smooth execution we’ve seen before. Nonetheless, its speed and responsiveness is ample enough to to appease even some of the power users out there.

Trying to live up to its brand name, T-Mobile’s version of the Samsung Galaxy S II puts up some admirable Quadrant scores – though, it seems to be all over the place. At times, we find it dishing up scores just under the 3,000 mark, which is surprising since the other variants are capable of hitting the 3,500 mark on the average. In our testing, it’s able to provide Quadrant scores ranging between 2,547 and 3,417. Meanwhile, with the AnTutu benchmark, it gives us a total score of 5,349, which seems to be on par to its siblings.

So yeah, its benchmark scores are close to what we’ve seen with the other Samsung Galaxy S II smartphones out there, but it’s nothing better. Of course, we’re content by them, but we’re more concerned that it doesn’t exude the same level of speed when compared to its siblings. Again, we’ll keep a close eye on this one to see how it fares in the long run with our review.

Related phones

Galaxy S II T-Mobile
  • Display 4.5" 480 x 800 pixels
  • Camera 8 MP / 2 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon S3, Dual-core, 1500 MHz
  • Storage 16 GB + microSDHC
  • Battery 1850 mAh(7.00h talk time)




Posts: 3131; Member since: Jan 12, 2010

Whoa, going from 3700 to 2500 is a huge difference.....what gives?

10. Dr.Phil

Posts: 2457; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

Quadrant has always been sorta off the wall with its numbers. I remember my Inspire 4G would go from 1300 to 2200. I trust An TuTu more for some reason just because they seem to get around the same number.

13. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

with quadrant you have to run it multiple times.. throw out the first 2 attempts and then take the 3rd or 4th.. it will get a lil faster each time as it loads the tests into memory. the difference is totally the chip. nothing touches a dual core exynos.. nothing. It also proves a great point between quadrants not always = real world performance, since they are posting similar quads but they are complaining that the snapdragon isnt as smooth as the exynos, even though the snapdragon is clocked up higher.

15. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

there you go kids, this man knows what he's talking about.

12. deV14nt unregistered

It's not an Exynos. That's what gives. Pretty impressive that Samsung's in-house Exynos 1.2 GHz is consistently faster than a 1.5 GHz Snapdragon. Course we already know that. Worth saying again. (Get the one with Exynos)

25. KingK unregistered

You can get better benchmarks with a 1.1ghz tegra 2 if you really want. Exynos, nothing impressive. snapdragon, weak sauce for a long time now.

19. Zeķīte unregistered

Maybe Samsung phones have faster ram modules, which could be reason for higher scores in benchmark tests.

20. mgonzalez

Posts: 23; Member since: Jun 12, 2011

No it's the architecture of the Qualcomm chipset compared to that of the Samsung Exynos. It is an A8 compared to an A9 (respectively). The A9 is thinner, faster, and more power efficient. Each generation of chipset architecture makes a large difference in performance.

21. Zeķīte unregistered

Then why two phones with identical chipest (Samsung and HTC Amaze 4G -Qualcomm Snapdragon S3) have such different scores in benchmark tests? If it is not RAM and memory modules speed, what else it could be?

2. manuell3g

Posts: 66; Member since: Aug 12, 2011

first of its a samsung. it has super amoled plus display of 4.5 inches. its android,am more than happy.this is not an icrap.lol


Posts: 3131; Member since: Jan 12, 2010

That has nothing to do with it Manuel. My Epic Touch gets 3700 scores and they even had a previous video of the T-Mobile SGS2 get that score as well. I just find it odd such a huge difference from then and now.

7. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

there's something about the Galaxy S II that gives Quadrant a huge boner no matter what processor it has and i'd like to know how.

14. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

snapdragons have been notoriously easy to mess with the I/O scores. I bet samsung messed with it before sending it out, to make it look like it was on par with exynos so it didnt lose sales. An easy way to find out would be to use full paid quadrant that broke it down and check out the differences between the Hercules, SGS2, sensation, and amaze.

16. Thump3rDX17

Posts: 2160; Member since: May 10, 2010

that would blow, can't trust anybody anymore.

11. Dr.Phil

Posts: 2457; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

Also, you do know I don't think he was replying to you, right? His comment just looks like what it is: a comment. Not one in reply to yours.

3. jinwons

Posts: 95; Member since: Nov 24, 2010

I'm impressed that Sammy could crank out over 3400 on quadrant from s3 snapdragon. Now their android firmware optimization ability is second to none. HTC amaze using the same chip could only get about 2500 on quadrant.

6. Ichigo unregistered

This guy does the best reviews. He goes straight to the point without BS I love it!

8. djosca4u2 unregistered

The Iphone 4s is way better than that plastic toy with a better screen resolution. I don't know why all the hype about this phone since at the end it is another htc Drod phone...You cares!


Posts: 3131; Member since: Jan 12, 2010

I love the stupid kids who post here and go on about any device being better, yet never have any facts to back it up. Just typical childish s**t like "omfggggg iphone rulz!" Nobody is going to take you seriously, nor care what you have to say unless you can actually talk like a mature adult and have facts to back up your claim. So please stop wasting your own time and spamming your nonsense.

17. lubba

Posts: 1313; Member since: Jan 17, 2011

Don't need super processors to run wp7. Only a luxury to have and even without super processors, does not hinder user experience. Though would gain more recognition with dual cores, more ram, and updated graphics. This is as seen nowadays as main selling point of smart phones for fanboys crave for this. In essence, they are the best advertisers of products. Best example is the guy camping out at store weeks ahead of iphone 5 launch or 4. Now if he he was camping for iphone 5, wonder what he's feeling right now. i have to laugh at this one. Lolzzzzzz!

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.