Samsung is going to court in the Netherlands for not updating its phones
by Alan Friedman / Mar 26, 2018, 6:59 PM
Ironically, Samsung does have such a policy. But the consumer agency points out that the two-year period used by Samsung starts from a phone's market launch, and someone could end up buying the device a year after the phone is released. That would give the purchaser only one year of updates.
So to clearly state the differences here, the Dutch consumer group wants to see updates offered for two-years after a phone is purchased, while Samsung's policy covers updates for two-years after a device is launched. See the difference? In addition, Sammy explains that its policy is only a guideline and points out that its top-of-the-line Galaxy S models receive OS updates for a longer period of time. For example, the Samsung Galaxy S4 was released in 2013, the Samsung Galaxy S5 launched in 2014 and the Samsung Galaxy S6 hit the market in 2015. All three of these models were updated as recently as 2017.
During the trial, the Consumentenbond is expected to point to the four to five-years that Apple iPhone models receive iOS updates. However, Samsung will surely respond by saying that Apple produces both the hardware and software of the iPhone, giving it an advantage that Android manufacturers don't enjoy.
source: Telecompaper via AndroidPolice
Posts: 372; Member since: Jan 24, 2018
hopefully Samsung will update their current flagships to the next version of Android before they lunch their new flagships with the new Android version
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 7:11 PM 5
Posts: 2893; Member since: Jun 30, 2014
It's stupid, in my opinion, to expect a brand to provide firmware updates for two years after the date of purchase. I shouldn't even need to explain how dumb is that to think about. It's not Samsung's fault people don't buy phones at launch time. This dutch organization needs more thoughtful people.
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 7:18 PM 2
Posts: 2311; Member since: Feb 14, 2011
While I do think it is a large task to ask a manufacturer to update it's phones past two years from the launch, I also think it's wrong to suggest people are dumb for not buying phones at the launch date. Not everyone can afford to buy a high-end smartphone right away, so they wait until the price drops or sales happen. I think there is some sort of middle ground here that Samsung could offer it's consumers: allow users to update their devices after the 2 year mark but not guarantee the performance or viability of those updates. The majority of time and resources spent on updating software for these devices is making sure the update is performing as it should. Perhaps a winning strategy would be to simply offer vanilla Android to users after the 2 year mark without guaranteeing performance or the inclusion of up-to-date Samsung features. Also, I read an interesting article that suggested the reason Samsung and others struggle with updates while Google pushes updates readily is because Samsung et. al. have a business strategy based on hardware sales while Google relies on software sales. So, it makes sense for Google to continue to want to update your device to ensure you're using their services while Samsung makes more money by simply selling the hardware.
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 8:09 PM 6
Posts: 2893; Member since: Jun 30, 2014
While I completely agree with your post, I never said people are dumb coz they don't buy phones on launch date. But instead that Samsung shouldn't have to pay the price if people don't do the said thing.
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 10:23 PM 1
Posts: 2311; Member since: Feb 14, 2011
I think it would still at least be good business practice to want to strive for overall longevity of a product. Generally speaking, companies that value longevity and reliability of their products are rewarded with high customer loyalty rates. Even if you may buy a phone every year or every two years, wouldn’t you feel better towards a company that promises 4 years of updates? It makes you feel better about your purchase and sets your mind at ease that you’ll never be missing out on the latest software.
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 11:04 PM 2
Posts: 172; Member since: Mar 26, 2013
Its not stupid. If you keep selling the phone officially, you need to keep it up to date for 2 years. Its not like Samsung is giving away the old phones for free or for 100 dollars. You still pay a premium price.
posted on Mar 27, 2018, 5:39 AM 0
Posts: 336; Member since: Jul 17, 2015
Use that same reasoning for your cars, big electronics, appliances, and even your house. Does that sound good now? When you buy something, you expect it to last for a while with a good support from the manufacturer.
posted on Mar 27, 2018, 9:53 AM 0
Posts: 2321; Member since: Aug 01, 2015
I can see Samsung changing the wording in the policy shortly. And in the future, for the consumer group to get Samsung to guarantee 2 years after purchase there will need to be some laws passed first. And those would then affect all OEMs. In the end this group may only be doing the consumers a disservice. If OEMs are required to give updates for two years after purchase then the prices of mid to low end units could skyrocket, or not be released to the Dutch market at all...
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 7:21 PM 1
Posts: 263; Member since: Dec 19, 2013
I don't know if a manufacturer could really guarantee updates to nonexistent future OSes. And I don't know if the OS manufacturer (Google) could guarantee backwards compatibility on 1000 products. I understand the frustration, but this probably means all Android based products (TVs, refrigerators, cars, thermostats included) should pull out of the Netherlands.
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 7:30 PM 0
Posts: 17181; Member since: Jun 17, 2009
So, if I bought a Galaxy S7 today in the Netherlands, Samsung should provide updates until 2020? That's beyond stupid.
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 7:40 PM 1
Posts: 402; Member since: Sep 11, 2016
I bought an iPhone SE today and I will get an update until 2020. If Samsung is better than Apple then why don't they give updates?
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 8:07 PM 5
Posts: 3069; Member since: Feb 06, 2013
You are comparing with an entirely different product, brand, and the policies guiding Apple. While, you have full right for your personal opinion and decisions, however, it’s stupid to take this case to the court.
posted on Mar 26, 2018, 9:18 PM 3
Posts: 953; Member since: Aug 17, 2014
Coding your own OS is even more time consuming. It’s no excuse. Samsung has billions, it can afford all the engineers it needs to get those updates coded and released. It just doesn’t want to because they’d rather you buy a new phone. Classic planned obsolescence.
posted on Mar 27, 2018, 12:26 AM 4
Posts: 25; Member since: Dec 02, 2014
You realize that someone who bought an iPhone SE 2 years ago will also then get updates till 2020 (going by your example)? That means your getting shafted 2 years of updates. So in your own example, your being screwed over. See the craziness? Updates should, and always have been (even by apple), had a policy of being released based on launch, NOT purchase. Its idiotic to have such a policy in place. I kid you not. You would have people buying phones right before their end of life, specifically to try and sue the manufacturer over 'not recieving updates for (period of time) after their purchase. That's how stupid both this idea, and a majority of the public, are.
posted on Mar 27, 2018, 5:09 AM 1
Posts: 158; Member since: Apr 28, 2014
I love Samsung but I want them to undergo a knife a learn a lesson when it comes offering updates.
posted on Mar 27, 2018, 1:52 AM 2
Posts: 1529; Member since: Nov 28, 2016
Same here. I too want them to undergo knife as in the name of 2yrs update policy they don’t give monthly security patches to every other devices, they only give them to those devices which will sell well & others wouldn’t even get the patches at all. Like galaxy A8+(2018) gets quarterly updates in the name of 2yr update whereas my A5(2016) still gets monthly security updates only because it’s sale were strong, & all those C series like C9pro which are way more expensive than A series phones doesn’t even get it. This thing is like no getting for what you pay & totally getting cheated. I too hope they get sued hard for such bad things.
posted on Mar 27, 2018, 5:03 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):