Samsung Galaxy S III resolution may have been leaked

Samsung Galaxy S III resolution may have been leaked
A leaked User Agent Profile (UAProf) is one of the least reliable sources of accurate information about an upcoming mobile device. For example, the leaked UAProf for the Galaxy Nexus claimed that it had a WVGA (480x800) screen, which was obviously quite untrue. That said, the new UAProf leak for the Samsung Galaxy S III looks a bit more realistic, although not 100% believable. 

The leaked document lists the screen resolution of the Galaxy S III as 1024x600. On first glance, that seems like a resolution high enough to be real, and the 16:9 aspect ratio is very interesting as well. A true 16:9 ratio on the screen would likely make for a slightly more elongated form factor than what we normally see on smartphones. The trouble we have is that the resolution doesn't hit HD capability. 

Sure, it's certainly possible that Samsung would forgo HD if it were really necessary. But, Samsung probably really wants to be able to push HD in its marketing scheme for the phone, so that's why it's hard to believe it wouldn't be an HD screen. The screen may very well have a 16:9 aspect ratio, but we're pretty sure that ultimately the phone will have a 720p screen. 

Still, even if this is accurate, the roundup of specs we have so far for the Galaxy S III would give it a 1024x600 screen (likely Super AMOLED Plus), a quad-core Exynos processor, 2 GB of RAM, an LTE radio, and an 8 MP rear camera, all in a 7mm thick frame. Not a bad roundup. 

source: pocketnow

Related phones

Galaxy S III
  • Display 4.8" 720 x 1280 pixels
  • Camera 8 MP / 1.9 MP front
  • Processor Samsung Exynos 4 Quad, Quad-core, 1400 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 2100 mAh(11.60h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

49 Comments

1. theBankRobber

Posts: 682; Member since: Sep 22, 2011

Well we will deff have to wait and see :)

2. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

When does it launch in the U.S.? And will it be on VZW for the U.S. launch?

7. tedkord

Posts: 17414; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

It will launch in the US 4 months or more after the rest of the world. IfVerizongets it, it will be at least 3 months later than the other US carriers. (They'll need the extra time to send it back to have half the RAM removed, and all the bloat installed.)

8. LoneShaolin

Posts: 307; Member since: Jan 14, 2012

Sounds about right.

19. chadrick0814 unregistered

It needs to be released in the US early because it will be disappointing when Apple files a patent law suit and tries to have it banned.....and we know a law suit is coming!

47. WILDCAT1935

Posts: 31; Member since: Mar 23, 2011

Unless its a Droid by HTC or Moto it won't be on Big red. Verizon supports substandard phones. They passed on Samsung S2 didn't they.

3. clevername

Posts: 1436; Member since: Jul 11, 2008

Now of only the third Gen focus will match these exact specs....the focus does seem to mirror the galaxy s line, except for the multi core processor.

4. imkyle

Posts: 1115; Member since: Nov 18, 2010

I'm thinking 720p screen. Not so sure about the quad core processor and the amount of ram.

5. rockstarlive

Posts: 307; Member since: Oct 19, 2011

16:9 is not bad. I could deal with that type of ratio.

11. Birds

Posts: 1172; Member since: Nov 21, 2011

600 x 1024 is not 16:9. 600 x by 1066 is lol. 600 x 1024 is more like 15.333:9 but came close.

6. Zayuh24

Posts: 149; Member since: Nov 21, 2011

If it has LTE, it will likely be with expensive Verizon and AT&T. Here's hoping that T-Mobile gets it *crosses fingers* >_

9. medicci37

Posts: 1361; Member since: Nov 19, 2011

No way! Will be 720p or better.

10. thelegend6657 unregistered

Why quad core ? Cant they just increase the clock speed of a dual core chip and add in an companion core. I dont think there is a need for quad core

12. taz89

Posts: 2014; Member since: May 03, 2011

even I think quads unnecessary but lol I wouldn't say know to it and also isn't quad core meant to be more energy efficient?

13. thelegend6657 unregistered

No it isnt , the tegra 3 is efficient because it has a COMPANION CORE . BTW , most apps wasnt really optimised for quad core so they just used the 2 cores . So isnt it better to just increase the clock speed ? Anyways , samsung has stated that cortex A15 dual core is faster than a cortex A9 quad core . Read : http://news.softpedia.com/news/Dual-Core-ARM-Cortex-A15-SoC-May-Outperform-Quad-Core-A9-Chips-212574.shtml . However A15 chips wont be coming soon , i personally recommend Raising the clock speed of current A9 dual core chip to 2ghz maybe more and add in an companion core of battery life

14. taz89

Posts: 2014; Member since: May 03, 2011

yep I know that dual core a15 will be faster than a9 quad but honestly I don't really care cause I find the s2 super fast already.I would be more than happy if they just added a companion core for longer lasting battery but I really hope they decide with the a15 chip...that is the LITTLE big arm based chips right?

16. thelegend6657 unregistered

Actually its called big little . You can always choose to continue to see tech news yet chooses not to upgrade just like me

17. taz89

Posts: 2014; Member since: May 03, 2011

Lol always get it the wrong way..I would have but I really want the HD display and hoping for bigger battery...funny thing is the screen on the s2 does not bother me but I know when I see the amoled HD+(fingers cross for the plus) I will want it no matter what if its not plus then I will maybe think about it..s3 will be the only phone I ditch my s2 for cause at the moment no other phone is really making my phone feel "outdated" also I have had the phone for nearly a year and I ALWAYS get a new phone every year.

25. thelegend6657 unregistered

HD display and bigger battery is a nice welcome . I hope it has xenon flash as it is more powerful

27. taz89

Posts: 2014; Member since: May 03, 2011

Xenon how could I forget would love that..I would love them to add both xenon and a led light for video and for use as a torch which comes in very handy.

33. cheetah2k

Posts: 2271; Member since: Jan 16, 2011

Higher clock speed = more power draw.. Nvidia said it themselves that a portable device would have longer battery power with 4 cores thread optimised at 1 Ghz, vs 2 cores running at 1.5 Ghz. It's just a shame that they're still using A9's....

36. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

dont worry, the T3 chip is just a stopgap. It wont be in service very long. They just wanted to have that "first" moniker. Gray chips will be out in like Q3.

35. bayusuputra

Posts: 963; Member since: Feb 12, 2012

actually, i was thinking of some crazy idea.. i wonder if they can make a dual dual-core, which can run together at the same time as quad core, but when only two cores are needed, they will switch off one of the dual core.. and when on standby or running low power apps, it can switch back to companion core.. basically a tegra 3 with a split cores.. instead of 4-1, it is 4-2-1.. but hey, i am not a tech expert, i'm just a dreamer.. haha! anyway, i just have this weird feeling that everytime a new android phone comes up, the first thing that crosses my mind is what will apple sue out of the device.. and i mean from all manufacturers.. yeah, weird brain, i know..

37. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

umm... thats exactly how the quad core works. not all 4 are on at the same time. they switch on and off on the fly as power is needed. all 4 cores will only ever be on for heavy loading and gaming.

21. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010

The higher the clock the more power it uses .so a 1.5- quad core could perform as good as a 2.0+ dual core without consuming as much energy. Also ICS is multi core supported and so are many new games coming to the market The next few months

24. thelegend6657 unregistered

it will always underclock itself if not needed that much speed . For quad core however all cores must be on at al times .

31. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010

The idea is that cores go on when needed, that's how the companion core of the tegra works and could work in a similar way

15. weirdfisher

Posts: 51; Member since: Mar 31, 2011

If it uses a lower resolution screen, it will have larger advantages in running benchmarks

18. lukasound

Posts: 152; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

1024x600 of true pixels on a Super AMOLED Plus screen would look just about the same as 1280x720 on the Nexus with the pentile matrix... If the screen is smaller than the 4,65 inches of the Nexus, it could even have a larger PPI count... Of course, what is expected of the worlds number one phone is nothing less than 1280x720 of true pixels Super AMOLED Plus on 4,65 inches...

22. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010

You ever used a nexus? anyone with it had little to complaint about the screen

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.