Motorola could be on the hook for $16.2 billion in patent dispute with Apple

Motorola could be on the hook for $16.2 billion in patent dispute with Apple
Motorola and Apple were in court Friday for a case in which the former is suing the Cupertino based company. Motorola alleges that Apple's iCloud infringes on patents for existing technology used for synchronization. During the hearing, Apple estimated that if Motorola seeks an preliminary injunction against iCloud now, it would have to post bond of $2.7 billion a year to cover Apple's losses in case a ban gets overturned. Considering that Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents was told by a Motorola attorney that the case could last until 2018, Motorola could be on the hook for as much as $16.2 billion to Apple.

While earlier reports said that it was likely that Motorola would win at least one of its German suits, Apple does have the right to set a bond figure to get damages in case it does win in appeal, a process that could take years. In Germany, those who receive a preliminary injunction against a product and/or company, can have it enforced immediately, even before appeal. However, as Apple pointed out in its bond request, if the preliminary injunction is reversed at the end of the process, the company whose product was banned could seek damages. In Germany, the end of the process means that the ruling can no longer be appealed, or that the next higher court refuses to hear the case.

To protect its interest, Apple could seek a bond from Motorola that originally was thought to be $2.7 billion for the entire length of the appeal process. Apple has now clarified this to be an annual figure that would be multiplied by the number of years that the case could last. Apple might have to prove to the courts that the product in question, in this case iCloud, generates revenue of $2.7 billion annually in Germany. A hearing is scheduled for February 3, 2012, when the court could reveal its decision on how much Apple's bond is worth.

Sometimes a patent holder will go along with posting a bond in order to have leverage against its opponent to work out a settlement. Until the court rules on February 3rd, there is no reason for Motorola to do anything. 

source: FossPatents via AppleInsider



1. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

Well now. Quite a gamble. If Motorola follows through on the injunction, their lawyers better make damn sure that they have an ironclad case. On the other hand, this seems like a last ditch threat by Apple to dissuade Motorola from kicking its ass in court. "If you lose, I'll get SO MUCH FREAKING MONEY FROM YOU! Bwahahahahahaha!!!!"

10. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

id like to see apple prove they make 2 billion a year in germany on icloud which just launched. doubt moto is too worried.

42. ledbetterp3

Posts: 467; Member since: Aug 31, 2011

Yea, go Motorola, use your money to improve your all ready great products. They might've deserved it, but I have to admit, I don't like patent wars with apple, they are probably now going to look for the stupidest things to sue you for...

43. ledbetterp3

Posts: 467; Member since: Aug 31, 2011

Which I don't think is much of a problem for them, but is annoying, and I hate reading Phonearena everyday about Apple suing someone because they made something better than them...

2. SlimSoulja86

Posts: 660; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

Lately Apple is just making me mad.

33. 530gemini

Posts: 2198; Member since: Sep 09, 2010

You're mad at Apple because Motorola sued them? You must be a really smart person :)

41. hepresearch unregistered

If you are Motorola, living in the Android apartment complex, and you see Apple, who lives alone in the great and spacious iOS mansion on the big hill just outside of town, go after a bunch of your neighbors, like HTC and Samsung, and then you hear grumblings in the community that your landlord, Google, and maybe even you, are the next target(s), would you not go on the offensive first, rather than wait for the inevitable and suffer an identical fate? Nah... never mind, I already know your answer... something to do with Motorola running away or jumping off the nearest cliff, no doubt?

46. SlimSoulja86

Posts: 660; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

530gemini, you know what, my dad taught me to never argue with a fool cos ppl wont see the difference between me and the fool, if you don't get my point why I'm mad at Apple, then I guess that proves my point that ur a dumb fool. Pls dont reply, i got more thing to deal with than your ignorant cells less brain, don't have energy to waste on idiots, later setlatla toe!

62. stealthd unregistered

Are you five years old?

63. hepresearch unregistered

As usual... gemini is not only after the Fandroids, but also the iFans who fail to show complete allegiance by the obligatory lock-step behavior...

3. gallitoking

Posts: 4721; Member since: May 17, 2011

TWell well well if it isnt Moto using Apple playbook and I can hear the fandroids clapping in jubilee from here.. got to go before I get run over by the fandroids..

7. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

Because you know that we applaud moves like this because it's mainly done in defense against Apple, right? Motorola is the only major Android manufacturer to go after Apple first, and it was only after Apple spent years flipping off Motorola in response to Motorola's request for royalties on tech Apple used which Motorola spent decades developing. Then Apple was like, "You know, we're allowed to use anyone's tech we want, but when we do, our products become special unique snowflakes which NOBODY is allowed to emulate, mimic, or evoke in THEIR designs!" And thus the metric s**t ton of lawsuits was dropped on Android.

14. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

um first off it wasnt apple who started this... it was microsoft.. and they do more anticompetitive, money taking, product claiming, whatever u want to call it than apple.. why should apple not try and make money off of products that look very similar? u dont see them suing wp7.. thats because its not the same...

21. tacohunter

Posts: 408; Member since: Nov 06, 2011

I agree with Lucas777

22. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

apple isnt trying to make money lucas. apple has yet to sue any of these companies for damages like MS does. Apple's end game in every suit is banning the company from selling any products in that country. that is the difference. If they wanna sue and get money for patent infringement, fine. if they wanna sue because they are losing market share and would rather ban than innovate, that is not fine. thats the difference.

23. iHateCrapple

Posts: 734; Member since: Feb 12, 2010

I don't recall MS starting ANY of this?

35. JGuinan007

Posts: 699; Member since: May 19, 2011

You wouldn't have MS doen't like to go to court they say hey you used my patents give me 20$ for every unit you sell you know what I like you so I'm gonna cut you a break give me 10$ a unit and make my products and I won't break your legs

57. DeviantDroid

Posts: 51; Member since: Apr 28, 2011

Probably because Microsoft settles out of court and they are not the biggest asses out there.... Apple doesn't want money they want products banned.... That's anti-competative......

27. thebikerboi2

Posts: 144; Member since: Apr 01, 2011

well heres the deal, apple arent suing everyone off because of tthere technologies, its because there using android. let me take you back to when these two operating systems were in there early development, at the time google and apple enjoyed a close relationship. Apple even had google executives as members of there board of directors. during this time apple created ios 1. little time passsed before google released its mobile os, android 1.0. apple felt betrayed by google and began a lawsute campaign against any android device to which they could find any excuse possiible. steve jobs even said that he would spend every bit of his companies assets to bring android down.

51. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

the biker, if your going back in time, then u should go the whole way back in time to when android was created.. which was before iOS. Google bought Android long before steve jobs showed off iOS to anyone. And if this yes yet another taco fake account, learn your damn lesson. They can track every account back to you and can/will keep banning them.

54. geedup

Posts: 74; Member since: Dec 01, 2011

Are you accusing every poster of being taco now? First this wasn't even pro Apple. He said they had a good relationship and then Steve Jobs got pissed at Google. That's all true. Also what a lame argument about android being in development before iPhone was announced. They had a whole year after iPhone was released to redo their OS. There's lots of things android took from iOS.

56. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

yet, taco, the only thing that actually changed after iOS was released was going from a motoQ/BB style device to a touchscreen/keyboard device. I dont know how thats copying. Apple still doesnt have a keyboard option. oh wait.. the world didnt start until apple said it could, right? lol

58. gallitoking

Posts: 4721; Member since: May 17, 2011

sorry i didnt answer before Sniggly.. i just dont read bulls**t on weekends... ohh is still Sunday.... ohh well. Didnt read anyways... but knowing you.... either you put faked numbers or express your love for Moto and Android domination

61. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

why is it that it seems like only the apple crazies blind post and "reply" without even knowing what anyone has said? is it a side effect of fruit-brain washing?

4. SlimSoulja86

Posts: 660; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

My new iPhone 4 App is called iSueU, I'm loving it, it is teaching me how to steal ideas, and how to turn old technology into something somewhat new and call it groundbreaking, and go "This changes everything". But what I like the most is the fact that it's teaching me how to sue everyone that looks at my iPhone and wear the same colour [or color] t-shirt as me. This is the best App of the year. and it's free. go check it out on App Store.http://www.appstore.iDiots/

5. SlimSoulja86

Posts: 660; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

Pls don't sue me Apple, I'm poor!

18. hepresearch unregistered

Apple attorney: Do not worry, Slim... debtor prison is not so bad...

47. SlimSoulja86

Posts: 660; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

hepresearch LOL, hehehehe!, my iPhone is not jail-broken, I'm fine inside the mental Apple jail, dont wanna go to any other prison, Apple psychological prison is enough for me [still luv my iPhone 4, just hate the limitations, thats all]

59. hepresearch unregistered

Hahaha... nice! Well played sir, well played... My brother has had a 3GS for a couple years now, and his wife just got a 4S this week. We all were playing with Siri for a while this evening just for kicks and giggles... it was very entertaining, all sorts of funny little easter-eggish stuff. If I was not so skeptical and fiercely independent (as in, not too enthused with the latest smartphones, and unsatisfied with the costs and limitations involved, among many other things...), I might have transitioned to an iPhone by now. I do think that, for a phone that is difficult to root or otherwise modify on the OS software end (well, mods are, technically, unauthorized by Apple...), the iPhone works exceedingly well out-of-the-box. I am fairly sure my mobile OS-modding days are over at this point... I am too tired to keep going when things are way too different from what I am used to working with. At this point, in the new competing business models, there will always be either risks or limitations with new smartphones... either you take care of the risks yourself, or you accept the OEM limitations that are required to manage the risks on your behalf.

6. som

Posts: 768; Member since: Nov 10, 2009

Hay Samsung got a team mate to sue cApple.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.