Marshmallow now powers 0.7% of all Android devices, KitKat still king of the hill
posted by Peter K. / Jan 05, 2016, 4:18 PM
It rather important to mention that the new version of Google's mobile platform has seen a 0.2% increase compared with the previous month, but in spite of this, it's still a little bit sad to see it so behind in terms of adoption.
KitKat still reigns supreme with 36.1%, despite that it suffered a minor decline of 0.5% in comparison with December 2015, when it had a distribution rate of 36.6% written next to its name. It is followed closely by Android 5.x Lollipop, which is clearly on the rise and is yet to peak.
In the meantime, most previous Android versions, like Jelly Bean, Ice Cream Sandwich, and Gingerbread are declining. All apart from Froyo - the archaic Android version is still holding strong to its 0.2% piece of the pie and doesn't seem to give up its spot.
Check out the dynamics of the Android distribution stats in the table right below.
|Version||Codename||Distribution in December 2015||Distribution in January 2016|
|2.3.3 - 2.3.7||Gingerbread||3.40%||3.00% ▼|
|4.0.3 - 4.0.4||Ice Cream Sandwich||2.90%||2.70% ▼|
We don't mean to be stingy and mean, but we feel that a comparison with iOS is due here. Apple's stats for January 2016 are yet to be released, but the latest piece of data from mid-December 2015 indicates that the newest version of iOS, iOS 9, was present on 71% of all eligible iOS devices; a month earlier, in November, it was making the rounds on exactly 70% of all iOS devices.
These stark discrepancies can be attributed to the different approaches that the two most popular operating systems employ - one is deeply fragmented, while the other one is tightly-controlled. Still, it hurts to see the newest version of the leading mobile platform so poorly adopted.
Posts: 2277; Member since: Sep 21, 2012
It should be illegal for OEMs to release phones without the latest version of any OSs. Google is being too friendly to OEMs and developers. Not saying they should be assholes to them like *that* OEM, but limit their decisions to an extent.
posted on Jan 05, 2016, 4:20 PM 4
Posts: 72; Member since: Nov 24, 2015
That's just stupid. How about allow the consumer to decide if the existing OS on the phone they are buying is worth it or not.
posted on Jan 05, 2016, 4:50 PM 5
Posts: 1946; Member since: Feb 15, 2012
You are absolutely correct, my friend just bought a brand new Samsung device, and it came with Kit Kat OS. Imagine buying any other device, and getting an updated OS from the hop.
posted on Jan 05, 2016, 5:24 PM 0
Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012
Good to have the latest Android version, however since app run the same from Ice Cream Sandwich onwards, its really a nice to have thing.
posted on Jan 06, 2016, 2:13 AM 0
Posts: 1999; Member since: Sep 16, 2011
The thing is those ios figures would be a lot different if every year older apple handsets weren't so often half crippled by the latest ios updates,using forcing apple users to upgrade their handsets to the latest apple shiny device and hence the latest ios firmware model. Take ios 9 and 9.01 etc afterwards which launched with the iphone 6s for instance which bricked so many iphone 5s handsets,the very same iphone 5s customers who conveniently were due upgrades a the end of a two year contract giving them the push to go out and buy the latest apple handsets.
posted on Jan 05, 2016, 5:35 PM 0
Posts: 2314; Member since: Apr 12, 2012
Guess people being cautious after lolliflop. Just got that crap off my Nexus 7 and runs so much better now. Flashed CM11 on it and now can actually use my tablet now. Doesn't look like my Note 3 will get Marshmallow unless I want to do the same.
posted on Jan 05, 2016, 6:12 PM 0
Posts: 2963; Member since: Jun 19, 2012
It's funny how Apple's chart only shows iOS biggest numbers "iOS 7, iOS 8, iOS 9" and it doesn't show 9.0.1, 9.0.2, 9.1, 9.2 etc.... Android should be shown split the same way even if certain versions were major upgrades inside the same desserts. The corrected chart should be as follows: Earlier Versions --------- 5.9% Jelly Bean --------------- 24.7% KitKat --------------------- 36.1% Lollipop ------------------ 32.6% Marshmallows ----------- 0.7% Now fragmentation doesn't look as bad but this doesn't change the fact that Marshmallows has been incredibly slow to adopt, but at least it is a way to show data more Fair
posted on Jan 05, 2016, 7:31 PM 1
Posts: 3960; Member since: Oct 21, 2014
That's the way Google presents the data on their website, same goes for Apple... http://developer.android.com/a
posted on Jan 06, 2016, 5:06 AM 0
Posts: 5192; Member since: Oct 28, 2013
Why? if you are able to get 9.0, then you get 9.2. Apple has delivered the update, not apple's fault a consumer hasn't upgraded. Opposite in android land. A device on 5.0.1, may not get 5.1.1, even though 5.1.1 is on their newer phone. That is fragmentation, and yes there is a difference.
posted on Jan 06, 2016, 9:49 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):