LG's Q2 profits lower than expected, struggling mobile division to blame


LG Electronics has announced its operating profit estimates for the second quarter of 2017. Judging by the reported preliminary April-June profit of 664 billion won ($574.49 million), it is estimated that the tech giant will record a year-over-year increase of about 14%. 

While this growth is by no means meager, the financial results actually fall beneath the expectations of several market analysts, who forecasted that the South Korean company would post a net income of about 755 billion won or $654 million. 

Moreover, it appears that the main reason for LG's stunted profits is the firm's mobile division. Dongbu Securities analyst S.R. Kwon has commented on the situation:


If this information is accurate, this would mean that LG's mobile business is operating at a loss for the 9th straight quarter, which could be attributed to the increased marketing spending for its latest flagship, the LG G6, as well as subdued sales figures for its other smartphone models. 

Still, this doesn't mean that the G6 isn't a successful product for LG's mobile division, especially when compared to last year's modular G5. However, it looks like the company needs to find a way to spread this popularity to some of its other models in order to become self-sustainable. 

Meanwhile, LG's "local" rival Samsung could very well record its most profitable quarter ever, with some speculating that Sammie might even earn more than Apple in Q2 2017.

FEATURED VIDEO

34 Comments

1. haruken

Posts: 306; Member since: Nov 06, 2013

Life ain't that good for LG. Meanwhile the better Korean brand is about to have a bigger quarter than Apple.

2. kiko007

Posts: 7500; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

Lol, Apple made 11 BILLION dollars last quarter. That's more than Google and Facebook COMBINED. Samsung fans say the most delusional s**t sometimes.

3. abdoualgeria

Posts: 928; Member since: Jul 27, 2015

Samsung q2 profit is 12.1 billion I think 12.1 > 11 ! No ?

4. kiko007

Posts: 7500; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

Citation needed. I know for a fact that there's no way Samsung's mobile division made that much money, which means you're using the entire conglomerate to go up against one Mobile company.

5. submar

Posts: 713; Member since: Sep 19, 2014

6. abdoualgeria

Posts: 928; Member since: Jul 27, 2015

apple profit means ( imac macbooks ipads ipods apple music and apple services ) so why you compare this to samsung mobile division alone ?

7. kiko007

Posts: 7500; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

Those are all literally mobile based computing aside from the iMac, fam. C'mon now...

10. haruken

Posts: 306; Member since: Nov 06, 2013

It's interesting how you suddenly mentioned "Samsung mobile" after you realized you had been exposed. Either way who cares if Samsung has more businesses than Apple ? It's clearly working and they're about to break records.

12. kiko007

Posts: 7500; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

They're breaking records they arbitrarily set themselves? Who would've thought...

24. Chaise unregistered

Records and such don't matter. The fact is that Samsung is about to become the most profitable tech company in the world, a position previously held by Apple. No ifs, ands, or buts. That amount of profit translates into Google, Facebook, Amazon and Netflix combined.

13. kiko007

Posts: 7500; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

This is a mobile site, bruh. I don't see RefrigeratorArena at the top of my screen, do you?

14. submar

Posts: 713; Member since: Sep 19, 2014

Cause he suddenly realised that who said the most delusional s**t?

19. combatmedic870

Posts: 986; Member since: Sep 02, 2015

You never said apple made 11 billion from IPhones... You just said they made 11 billion.

20. CanYouSeeTheLight

Posts: 1122; Member since: Jul 05, 2012

Funny how this comment section on an LG entry is full of Samsung and Apple comments

32. omnitech

Posts: 1131; Member since: Sep 28, 2016

Which makes you sheep look pretty bad if you can let Apple milk you that much just on mobile. If they milked you in other products as well then it might be a more respectable number. baaaaaa

8. Medoogalaxy

Posts: 232; Member since: May 25, 2017

Samsung empire it's has more than 500000 Employee and it's the most company Spending on advertising and research and development

9. kiko007

Posts: 7500; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

....So?

15. Medoogalaxy

Posts: 232; Member since: May 25, 2017

However, samsung achieved the highest quarter profit on planet So Know your size and the size of your company, rotten whose phones only buy children, ignorant of technology

17. Cicero

Posts: 1137; Member since: Jan 22, 2014

So, Apple have to buy some displays and 3D NAND from Samsung. They HAVE to so it because no one remains. ... So?

21. vuyonc

Posts: 1091; Member since: Feb 24, 2014

I'd attribute their 9 quarter misfortune to "too little and too much, too late". The G6 is the G2's righteous successor by not screwing up or jumping too far ahead in design aspects that mattered to people. Plus they should have streamlined their device portfolio.

29. Anchor

Posts: 160; Member since: Jun 16, 2017

I think brand popularity and lack of serious advertising I sweat costs them today, the G3 and especially the G4 were both solid and great phones, if they put in more money into their ad like Samy, I think they'll make more profit. In my country most people don't even know LG makes smartphones but ask the same people about Samsung and they'll just drool over you.

11. antmiu2

Posts: 550; Member since: Jun 19, 2011

i will only get worse if the launch the G6+ with the same SD 821

16. limona

Posts: 72; Member since: May 19, 2017

They will, but don't think they won't release V30 with SoC 835 one month later. G6+ will target cheaper segment.

18. PenTiltoKet

Posts: 552; Member since: May 18, 2016

In the last couple of year LG product not good enough. I think LG need new spec designer...

22. sun0066

Posts: 275; Member since: Feb 12, 2011

lg have to wake up , they should not expect that selling a 2016 phone ( specs wise , processor , 32 gb rom ) they will have a good quarter , people are getting more exigents with phone specs. put an 835 processor and make the rom larger 64 or even 128 and you will see , they tried to save money with the specs , then they end up " saving " clients .

23. Xperia14

Posts: 1208; Member since: Sep 01, 2015

They should have waited for the SD835, and they should have released one version, and not a restricted one for Europe (no wireless charging, no 64GB and no quad DAC).

26. hazard1

Posts: 236; Member since: Feb 11, 2017

Hindsight is 20/20, but I agree with everything you said. They weighed the updated processor vs. the earlier release and made what they thought was the better decision, and then proceeded to shoot themselves in the foot (with the 32 GB memory in most places, no Quad DAC except in limited markets, wireless charging in North America only, etc). The problem is, I doubt it would have mattered if they had waited and released a phone with the 835 chip and avoided all the other mistakes. They would have then faced greater competition with the later release. Every LG phone is a "almost...." There is always something. The G6 was close. Maybe the V30 will be what the G6 could have been.

25. cmdacos

Posts: 4260; Member since: Nov 01, 2016

Time to pull the plug LG.

27. Furbal unregistered

The g6 is an absolute solid phone, it would be my DD of it had a faster focusing Camera. I like it more than my u11 but the u11 just Kills it in the camera department since I've got kids. Much easier to get clean photos with it

28. ryq24

Posts: 875; Member since: Oct 17, 2011

Price cut for the LG G6 shows after only a few months of released show its not doing as well as what LG want it to be.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.