LG G3 specs and features officially showcased at a "secret" event in South Korea

LG G3 specs and features officially showcased at a
The LG G3 leaks are just non-stop, though we wouldn't categorize what we have here as a leak per se. Instead, it would appear that LG basically revealed its new G3 flagship at an alleged "secret" pre-announcement event at a Korean retailer, or so our tispter claims. This means that both specs and features are now public knowledge, though do keep in mind that LG has a knack for differentiating its home/away versions of its flagship, so specific changes may still happen.

Anyway, let's talk specs. As expected, the highlight of the LG G3 will be its 5.5-inch, 1440 x 2560 (QHD) pixel resolution screen, which will provide the super-crisp, 538 pixels per inch. Also as expected, the relatively big screen doesn't automatically mean a giant device -- instead, the G3's footprint is almost identical to that of the 5.2-inch Sony Xperia Z2, considering its dimensions of 146.3 x 74.6 x 8.9 mm. 

The rest of the specs include a quad-core Snapdragon 801 and 3GB of LPDDR3 RAM, 32GB of internal storage (no info on microSD slot), and a 13-megapixel rear shooter with the company's improved Optical Image Stabilization +, along with a 2.1-megapixel front-facing cam with an "enhanced selfie mode". It would also appear that we were right in assuming that LG is planning on integrating a laser auto focus assist beam into the body of the G3, which will supposedly deliver fast focus even in low light scenarios. Lastly, keeping the lights of the Android 4.4 KitKat-based handset on is a 3000 mAh cell.

Thanks for the tip!

Related phones

G3
  • Display 5.5" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 13 MP / 2.1 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 801, Quad-core, 2500 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3000 mAh(21h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

125 Comments

1. quakan

Posts: 1418; Member since: Mar 02, 2011

I have to admit, that phone looks good.

2. Ashoaib

Posts: 3260; Member since: Nov 15, 2013

Yeah, it is looking good... bit close to oneplus1... specs are also quite impressive unlike boring out dated apple's specs

6. quakan

Posts: 1418; Member since: Mar 02, 2011

That last part...why lol?

15. ihavenoname

Posts: 1693; Member since: Aug 18, 2013

He's comparing the fruit to the G3 (because he wrote apple small). G3 is fine device, but you can have many hundred apples with the price, G3 is not nutritious and you can't have it as red nor green. Also, apple recharges you.

16. Jason2k13

Posts: 1445; Member since: Mar 28, 2013

who cares, its funny lol

32. CoastCity

Posts: 257; Member since: Mar 07, 2014

funny is that moto on the window shop "just watch - the end"

44. Aploine

Posts: 444; Member since: Oct 24, 2013

LOL LG did it again. Remember that one for G2 "don't touch only the front, touch the the back also"?

119. ShenAlJoker

Posts: 113; Member since: Jul 19, 2013

Nice attention to detail buddy!!!!!!!

104. sgtdisturbed47

Posts: 960; Member since: Feb 02, 2012

I'm sure we can change how the lock screen looks. What I'm more interested in is if the output of the headphone jack will be improved, because the G2 output volume is pathetic. I have to use a custom headphone amp (cmoy) in order to use my phone with headphones or in the car via line-in.

29. Mxyzptlk unregistered

Outdated and yet the latest iPhone continues to be more relevant than most flagships released right now.

43. jrod78414

Posts: 102; Member since: Dec 18, 2013

say what angel dust have you doing bOSS

79. joseg81

Posts: 204; Member since: Jul 15, 2011

lol use the compare feature on the site please. whether you're an apple fan or google fan the specs don't lie.

96. pavsidhu

Posts: 214; Member since: May 20, 2014

That's only because people don't understand the true potential of Android and are not aware of the major differences that make Android then iPhone

35. Zeeya

Posts: 331; Member since: Mar 17, 2013

apple specs? haha...

55. greatoneiw

Posts: 41; Member since: Apr 08, 2014

now that they raised the bar for screen even 4.7 iphone 6 seems boring to me

93. PunyPoop

Posts: 752; Member since: Jan 18, 2013

LG you nailed it! It's a pleasure having the G3 in my hands (together with my z2)! Release it LG! CAN'T WAIT!

3. AstronautJones

Posts: 305; Member since: Aug 01, 2012

Agreed. Looks like a beast. Still will wait for s5 prime, m8 prime to compare. All 3 should be winners

21. amiroomg

Posts: 19; Member since: Dec 07, 2013

i think most compate is btw m8 prime and g3 .. maybe note 4 will be best choice for sami in second half the year.

39. Tsoliades

Posts: 228; Member since: Dec 22, 2012

With new phones as good looking as these, I'm not worrying too much about the cancellation of the Nexus line. As long as manufacturers keep making good-looking phones with on-screen buttons with no ugly logos, I'll be fine.

47. Nikolas.Oliver

Posts: 1574; Member since: Jul 01, 2012

Still plastic mate

60. LGisgood

Posts: 833; Member since: Jun 23, 2012

PLASTIC IS GOOD & BETTER FOR A SMARTPHONE! METAL IS NOT GOOD !

70. Supraman21

Posts: 467; Member since: Jun 09, 2010

Nope. Metal is better. Go to anandtechs site and they have an article showing that metal is a better choice in material

73. LGisgood

Posts: 833; Member since: Jun 23, 2012

nope! metal =WEAK RECEPTION SIGNAL FOR YOUR PHONE! metal=you may get MORE RADIATIONS from your Phone metal = not easy to swap your battery PLASTIC PHONE IS FAR BETTER THAN AN ALUMINUM PHONE Plastic is lighter and more durable. Doesn’t retain heat or cold Better a plastic that is flexible than a aluminum that once you bang it will stay that way. Also metal body is hard on wifi , gps and phone antenna so it cant be the whole body metal, MUST BE partial plastic. see....? PLASTIC PHONE DOES HAVE STRONGER RECEPTION SIGNAL PLASTIC PHONE LESS RADIATIONS do i need to say more....

86. ausnote2

Posts: 84; Member since: Dec 07, 2012

+plastic more environnentally friendly than metal in making phone +lighter plastic is always superior to glass/metal regardless of those diehard fans who keeps putting their head in the sand :)

102. Supraman21

Posts: 467; Member since: Jun 09, 2010

”Polycarbonate is a poor conductor of heat, which means that with today’s thermally constrained devices, true nominal clockspeed for both CPU and GPU on the SoC will be lower than a phone or tablet that is made of metal such as aluminum and magnesium” “People often bring up the car analogy to argue that polycarbonate protects a phone or tablet better, but there's no such thing as a crumple zone in a phone. Even the back cover serves a purpose, as antennas are inserted into the back cover in order to have the space for the huge number of frequencies supported. Bending the back cover into the phone is often a dangerous problem, as it will affect the delicate antenna connectors, which are often small, spring-like pieces that make contact with the back cover. This is an issue, as while the metal antenna connectors are elastic to a certain extent, once stretched too far it won’t spring back. One of the most notable examples of this issue can be seen with the Tegra 3 variant of the HTC One X. This variant of the One X would often lose all WiFi and Bluetooth reception due to crushed antenna connectors. Fixing the problem required additional reinforcement to prevent the back cover from bending in too far. As seen in the photo from iFixit's teardown of the Galaxy S4 below, the connectors are small gold-plated nubs that touch parts of the back cover.” “The safety cell is made to be as rigid as possible to prevent crushing the contents within the safety cell. In short, aluminum is actually more durable, not less. As pointed out back in the iPhone 4 review, the external antennas required by all-aluminum designs can give better reception and performance than internal antennas. Even today, it's possible to see better reception performance from an all-metal device. For example, the Sprint One M8 has a higher effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP) on 1900 MHz CDMA than the Sprint Galaxy S5.” “Another key advantage is the much higher thermal conductivity of aluminum, which allows for better performance in situations where a device is thermally limited. After all, heat sinks are made of aluminum and/or copper, not polycarbonate or glass. The best example of this can be seen in the comparison between the Galaxy S5 and HTC One (M8) in the T-Rex rundown test, as the frame rate of the One (M8) is significantly higher than the Galaxy S5” FACTS ARE FACTS. ALUMINIUM IS BETTER THAN PLAY SCHOOL KIDDY TOY PLASTIC

108. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

This is mostly nonsense. The iPhone 4 has terrible reception on just about every carrier. Did you forget "you're holding it wrong" and the rubber bumper Apple had to give away for free as the reception of the iPhone 4 was garbage? If you look at the SAR values for metal phones vs. plastic phones, you will see most, if not all, metal phones have higher SAR values. This means more chance of getting brain cancer and other medical problems. One could go on and on, refuting this rubbish from Anandtech. But what's the point? Anandtech is just a shill site for big corporations that pay them to promote their products.

74. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

Anandtech? The same site where that telecom tool Brian Klug used to write on every phone review how removable battery and SD card were bad for phones and made them worse phones? Even after all the phone manufacturer customer surveys said people wanted both features, with the SD card being the most wanted. As HTC publicly stated, they made SD card expansion part of the M8 because customers demanded it. Anandtech is just noise now.

89. Ashoaib

Posts: 3260; Member since: Nov 15, 2013

Anandtech is usually out of some other world... they sometime sounds doing review just for the sake of review... I dont trust them and feel them most of the time irrelevent

103. Supraman21

Posts: 467; Member since: Jun 09, 2010

He's slightly right. Phones with non removable batteries tend to have bigger batteries because of the extra space. I'm perfectly fine with ought having that "feature" because I never once needed or wanted to swap out my battery. Just like the majority of consumers out there. Also, SD cards are very volatile and go to crap pretty easily-I've had it happen to me multiple times. Most phones withought SD slots tend to have higher internal storage.

106. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

Samsung sells more phones and makes more money than virtually every Android HW maker on the planet. And they listen to their customers and include removable batteries and SD cards with many, if not most of their phones. So you are going with your buddy Klug and and saying the majority of customers don't want these things when in fact the majority of Android customers are buying these very things. Maybe you and Klug should start your own review site. I'm sure Apple and other companies that charge $200 for $5-8 worth of flash memory and $150-200 for $15 battery replacements will send you some advertising business.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.